Evaluation of Scale Effects on UAV-Based Hyperspectral Imaging for Remote Sensing of Vegetation

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Tie [1 ]
Guan, Tingyu [1 ]
Qiu, Feng [2 ]
Liu, Leizhen [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaokang [4 ]
Zeng, Hongda [5 ]
Zhang, Qian [1 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Sch Geomat Sci & Technol, Nanjing 211816, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Ecol & Environm, Nanjing Inst Environm Sci, Sci Observat & Res Stn Ecol Environm Wuyi Mt, Fujian Wuyishan State Integrated Monitoring Stn Ec, Nanjing 210042, Peoples R China
[3] China Agr Univ, Coll Grassland Sci & Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Geodesy & Geomat, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Fuzhou 350108, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
scale effect; UAV-based imaging; flight height; vegetation index; atmospheric correction; viewer geometry; canopy heterogeneity; LIGHT-USE EFFICIENCY; CLOUD INTERACTIONS; MODIS EVI; INDEX; ABILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/rs17061080
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the rapid advancement of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in recent years, UAV-based remote sensing has emerged as a highly efficient and practical tool for environmental monitoring. In vegetation remote sensing, UAVs equipped with hyperspectral sensors can capture detailed spectral information, enabling precise monitoring of plant health and the retrieval of physiological and biochemical parameters. A critical aspect of UAV-based vegetation remote sensing is the accurate acquisition of canopy reflectance. However, due to the mobility of UAVs and the variation in flight altitude, the data are susceptible to scale effects, where changes in spatial resolution can significantly impact the canopy reflectance. This study investigates the spatial scale issue of UAV hyperspectral imaging, focusing on how varying flight altitudes influence atmospheric correction, vegetation viewer geometry, and canopy heterogeneity. Using hyperspectral images captured at different flight altitudes at a Chinese fir forest stand, we propose two atmospheric correction methods: one based on a uniform grey reference panel at the same altitude and another based on altitude-specific grey reference panels. The reflectance spectra and vegetation indices, including NDVI, EVI, PRI, and CIRE, were computed and analyzed across different altitudes. The results show significant variations in vegetation indices at lower altitudes, with NDVI and CIRE demonstrating the largest changes between 50 m and 100 m, due to the heterogeneous forest canopy structure and near-infrared scattering. For instance, NDVI increased by 18% from 50 m to 75 m and stabilized after 100 m, while the standard deviation decreased by 32% from 50 m to 250 m, indicating reduced heterogeneity effects. Similarly, PRI exhibited notable increases at lower altitudes, attributed to changes in viewer geometry, canopy shadowing and soil background proportions, stabilizing above 100 m. Above 100 m, the impact of canopy heterogeneity diminished, and variations in vegetation indices became minimal (<3%), although viewer geometry effects persisted. These findings emphasize that conducting UAV hyperspectral observations at altitudes above at least 100 m minimizes scale effects, ensuring more consistent and reliable data for vegetation monitoring. The study highlights the importance of standardized atmospheric correction protocols and optimal altitude selection to improve the accuracy and comparability of UAV-based hyperspectral data, contributing to advancements in vegetation remote sensing and carbon estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Review on UAV-Based Remote Sensing Technologies for Construction and Civil Applications
    Guan, Shanyue
    Zhu, Zhen
    Wang, George
    DRONES, 2022, 6 (05)
  • [32] Water Turbidity Retrieval Based on UAV Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
    Cui, Mengying
    Sun, Yonghua
    Huang, Chen
    Li, Mengjun
    WATER, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [33] Mangrove species classification with UAV-based remote sensing data and XGBoost
    Xu Y.
    Zhen J.
    Jiang X.
    Wang J.
    National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2021, 25 (03) : 737 - 752
  • [34] From Satellite to UAV-Based Remote Sensing: A Review on Precision Agriculture
    Phang, Swee King
    Chiang, Tsai Hou Adam
    Happonen, Ari
    Chang, Miko May Lee
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 127057 - 127076
  • [35] Analyzing UAV-Based Remote Sensing and WSN Support for Data Fusion
    Alcarria, Ramon
    Bordel, Borja
    Angel Manso, Miguel
    Iturrioz, Teresa
    Perez, Marina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & SYSTEMS (ICITS 2018), 2018, 721 : 756 - 766
  • [36] The potential of UAV-based remote sensing for supporting precision agriculture in Indonesia
    Rokhmana, Catur Aries
    1ST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LAPAN-IPB SATELLITE (LISAT) FOR FOOD SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2015, 24 : 245 - 253
  • [37] Establishment of Plot-Yield Prediction Models in Soybean Breeding Programs Using UAV-Based Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Zhao, Jinming
    Yang, Guijun
    Liu, Jiangang
    Cao, Jiqiu
    Li, Chunyan
    Zhao, Xiaoqing
    Gai, Junyi
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (23)
  • [38] Lessons Learned from UAV-Based Remote Sensing for Precision Agriculture
    Bhandari, Subodh
    Raheja, Amar
    Chaichi, Mohammad R.
    Green, Robert L.
    Do, Dat
    Pham, Frank H.
    Ansari, Mehdi
    Wolf, Joseph G.
    Sherman, Tristan M.
    Espinas, Antonio
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2018, : 458 - 467
  • [39] A Subband Radiometric Calibration Method for UAV-Based Multispectral Remote Sensing
    Deng, Lei
    Hao, Xianglei
    Mao, Zhihui
    Yan, Yanan
    Sun, Jie
    Zhang, Aiwu
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 11 (08) : 2869 - 2880
  • [40] Utilizing UAV-based hyperspectral remote sensing combined with various agronomic traits to monitor potato growth and estimate yield
    Liu, Yang
    Feng, Haikuan
    Fan, Yiguang
    Yue, Jibo
    Yang, Fuqin
    Fan, Jiejie
    Ma, Yanpeng
    Chen, Riqiang
    Bian, Mingbo
    Yang, Guijun
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2025, 231