Leveraging Design Thinking to Enhance Engineering Teaching: An Operational Model

被引:0
|
作者
Au, Emily Yim Lee [1 ]
Goonetilleke, Ravindra S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Jacobs Inst Design Innovat, Coll Engn, Berkeley, CA 94709 USA
[2] Khalifa Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Diamonds; Education; Springs; Prototypes; Measurement; Technological innovation; Process control; Iterative methods; Creativity; Complexity theory; Creative thinking; design for humanity; design teaching; empathetic design; human-centered design; CREATIVITY;
D O I
10.1109/TE.2024.3467387
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contribution: The proposed operational model offers a detailed framework for understanding the complexities of design thinking. It helps instructors evaluate each stage, promoting the development of high-quality designs. This model emphasizes the link between the various stages and the final design quality, steering students toward achieving outstanding results. Background: Design thinking benefits students across almost all majors by promoting critical thinking, creativity, and teamwork. It places a strong emphasis on the user's needs and involves testing and refining prototypes with empathy for the user. While easy to grasp, its practical application poses complex challenges, particularly in engineering and science education. Intended Outcomes: This study examines the challenges of teaching design thinking and proposes an operational model to represent the design process. Application Design: The model incorporates a "spring system" to demonstrate potential variations in the design process, including the number of user-centered design (UCD) methods used, the size of the problem/solution space, the difficulty or resistance to transitioning between activities, and time spent on each activity. Findings: Two projects illustrate the use of the model. Using the proposed metrics, the design process can be established, and the operational model can control the learning process while enhancing the consistency and quality of the design outcome. Future empirical research should validate the model's effectiveness, address biases, and foster critical thinking and diverse perspectives within student teams.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Teaching design thinking to medical students
    Trowbridge, Matthew
    Chen, David
    Gregor, Alex
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 52 (11) : 1199 - 1200
  • [42] Thinking on Teaching of Practice of Park Design
    Yang, Yunfeng
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (EER 2013), VOL 2, 2013, 2 : 243 - 248
  • [43] DESIGN THINKING AS AN APPROACH IN TEACHING TRANSLATION
    Kasperaviciene, R.
    Maumeviciene, D.
    Motiejuniene, J.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 7661 - 7667
  • [44] HARNESSING DESIGN THINKING TO ENHANCE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS
    Tanenbaum, Molly L.
    Breland, Jessica Y.
    Altman, Myra
    Krugman, Sara F.
    Gibson, Bryan
    Yingling, Leah
    Miller, Lisa S.
    Perski, Olga
    Hood, Korey K.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 52 : S423 - S423
  • [45] Applying Systems Thinking to Engineering and Design
    Monat, Jamie P.
    Gannon, Thomas F.
    SYSTEMS, 2018, 6 (03)
  • [46] Adapting engineering design thinking for sustainability
    Date, Geetanjali
    Chandrasekharan, Sanjay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [47] Linking strategy thinking to engineering design
    Ahola, J
    Sandström, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2000 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2: MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 2000, : 431 - 436
  • [48] Requirement Engineering and the Role of Design Thinking
    Husaria, Anas
    Guerreiro, Sergio
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICEIS), VOL 2, 2020, : 353 - 359
  • [49] AGILE MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING OF PASSENGER TRAIN OPERATIONAL DESIGN
    Barrett, Josh
    Wang, Nan
    Carricajo, Clara
    Dalbavie, Jeanne-Marie
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 JOINT RAIL CONFERENCE (JRC2022), 2022,
  • [50] Visual thinking in engineering design teams
    Reid, F
    Reed, S
    Edworthy, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE DESIGN 98, 1998, : 47 - 52