Recent Technologies for the Determination of SARS-CoV-2 in Wastewater

被引:0
|
作者
Gazu, Nolwazi T. [1 ]
Morrin, Aoife [2 ]
Fuku, Xolile [1 ]
Mamba, Bhekie B. [1 ]
Feleni, Usisipho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Africa, Inst Nanotechnol & Water Sustainabil iNanoWS, Coll Sci Engn & Technol, Florida Campus,Florida Pk 1710, ZA-1709 Johannesburg, South Africa
[2] Dublin City Univ, Natl Ctr Sensor Res, Sch Chem Sci, Dublin D09DXA0, Ireland
来源
CHEMISTRYSELECT | 2025年 / 10卷 / 13期
关键词
Conventional and electrochemical biosensor integration; Conventional monitoring; COVID-19; Electrochemical-bioreceptor biosensing; BIOSENSORS; COVID-19; DIAGNOSIS; CORONAVIRUS; PROGRESS; PROTEIN; LAMP;
D O I
10.1002/slct.202404698
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak raised major concerns in public health globally, raising the crucial need for the development of methods to monitor the spread of COVID-19 in communities worldwide. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) surveillance has been used as a novel tool to monitor outbreaks in communities because of its affordability and efficiency in tracking infectious contaminants. Unlike other means of public health tracking, wastewater is independent of individuals having accessibility to healthcare, doctor visits, or infection testing availability. Consequently, raising considerable awareness and complete tracking of infections, including COVID-19 at a community level. In WBE studies, polymerase chain reaction-based (PCR) techniques are referred to as the "gold-standard" method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in many countries. Nevertheless, despite the extensive development of sensitive and selective PCR-based methods, these techniques have shown some limitations that hinder their application, such as the requirement of repeated heating and cooling cycles and analysis time of 3-4 h. The development of alternative techniques that do not rely on the same consumables as the conventionally employed methods, such as electrochemical biosensing, for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in environmental water samples offers favorable advantages such as improved turnaround times and portability. However, the currently employed techniques are highly focused on clinical applications than wastewater. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages associated with conventional and a novel alternative: electrochemical-bioreceptor-based technique for detecting SARS-CoV-2. In addition, highlights the broad use of these techniques in clinical applications than WBE, the binding affinity of the various bioreceptors toward SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins, and their use in enhancing the analytical properties of electrochemical biosensors and the integration of electrochemical biosensors with conventional techniques. The integrated systems, especially, electrochemical-CRISPR based, have shown high sensitivities (down to concentrations of atto-molar), with potential application in low-resource areas.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Challenges in Measuring the Recovery of SARS-CoV-2 from Wastewater
    Kantor, Rose S.
    Nelson, Kara L.
    Greenwald, Hannah D.
    Kennedy, Lauren C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (06) : 3514 - 3519
  • [42] Tracking SARS-CoV-2 and its variants in wastewater in Tunisia
    Othman, Ines
    Bisseux, Maxime
    Helmi, Amna
    Hamdi, Rawand
    Nahdi, Imen
    Slama, Ichrak
    Mastouri, Maha
    Bailly, Jean Luc
    Aouni, Mahjoub
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2024, 22 (08) : 1347 - 1356
  • [43] Survivability of Delta and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
    Sherchan, Samendra P.
    Thakali, Ocean
    Ikner, Luisa A.
    Gerba, Charles
    Haramoto, Eiji
    WATER RESEARCH, 2023, 246
  • [44] Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a Prison Facility
    Thakali, Ocean
    Shahin, Shalina
    Sherchan, Samendra P.
    WATER, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [45] Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater matrix: a review
    Nitish Venkateswarlu Mogili
    Maheswara Reddy Mallu
    Jagadeeshwar Kodavaty
    Rajeswara Reddy Erva
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2024, 196
  • [46] SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater: State of the knowledge and research needs
    Kitajima, Masaaki
    Ahmed, Warish
    Bibby, Kyle
    Carducci, Annalaura
    Gerba, Charles P.
    Hamilton, Kerry A.
    Haramoto, Eiji
    Rose, Joan B.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 739
  • [47] Direct and indirect effects of SARS-CoV-2 on wastewater treatment
    Teymoorian, Termeh
    Teymourian, Targol
    Kowsari, Elaheh
    Ramakrishna, Seeram
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2021, 42
  • [48] Accessible and Validated Processing of SARS-CoV-2 from Wastewater
    Rondeau, Nicole C.
    Rose, Oliver J.
    Ariyan, Lina A.
    Mailloux, Brian J.
    Miranda, Jj L.
    MICROBIOLOGY RESOURCE ANNOUNCEMENTS, 2021, 10 (21):
  • [49] SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels in Scotland's wastewater
    Scorza, Livia C. T.
    Cameron, Graeme J.
    Murray-Williams, Roisin
    Findlay, David
    Bolland, Julie
    Cerghizan, Brindusa
    Campbell, Kirsty
    Thomson, David
    Corbishley, Alexander
    Gally, David
    Fitzgerald, Stephen
    Low, Alison
    McAteer, Sean
    Roberts, Adrian M. I.
    Fang, Zhou
    Mayer, Claus-Dieter
    Frantsuzova, Anastasia
    Baby, Sumy V.
    Zielinski, Tomasz
    Millar, Andrew J.
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [50] A review on the potential of photocatalysis in combatting SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater
    Nasir, Atikah Mohd
    Awang, Nuha
    Hubadillah, Siti Khadijah
    Jaafar, Juhana
    Othman, Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan
    Salleh, Wan Norhayati Wan
    Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2021, 42