Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Weinstein, Marc A. [1 ,2 ]
Ayala, Giovanni A. [3 ]
Roura, Raul [3 ]
Christmas, Kaitlyn N. [3 ]
Warren, Deborah H. [3 ]
Simon, Peter [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Orthopaed & Sports Med, Morsani Sch Med, 13330 USF Laurel Dr, Tampa, FL USA
[2] Florida Orthopaed Inst, 13020 Telecom Prkw N, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Fdn Orthopaed Res & Educ, 4115 W Spruce St, Tampa, FL 33607 USA
来源
关键词
Expandable cage; TLIF; Lumbar interbody fusion; Radiographic parameters; Back pain; Lumbar lordosis; Segmental lordosis; CAGE; LORDOSIS; SUBSIDENCE; RESTORATION; TECHNOLOGY; SPACERS; DISTRACTION; DISABILITY; ANTERIOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100286
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of interbody cages as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusion remains an important technique to enhance segmental stability, promote solid arthrodesis, maintain neuroforaminal decompression, and preserve/improve segmental lordosis. Appropriate segmental lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance is well-known to be critical for long-term patient outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of TLIF in patients using an articulating, expandable cage. Primary endpoint was clinical and radiographic outcomes, including complications, at 12 and 24 months. Methods: A total of 37 patients underwent open single-level or 2-level TLIF by a single surgeon using an expandable cage with concomitant bilateral pedicle screws and posterolateral arthrodesis. Clinical outcomes included ODI and VAS for back and legs. Radiographic outcomes included pelvic incidence and tilt, lumbar and segmental lordoses, and disc height at the operative level(s). All outcomes were collected at baseline, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postop. Results: A total of 28 patients were available for analysis. Nine patients failed to follow-up at 24 months. Mean ODI scores showed significant improvement, from pre-to-postoperative at 24 months (55%; p<.0001). VAS for back and legs was significantly lower at 24 months on average by 72 and 79%, respectively (p<.0001 for both). Both segmental and lumbar lordoses significantly improved by 5.3 degrees and 4.2 degrees (p<.0001 and p=.049), respectively. Average disc height improved by 49% or 6.1 mm (p<.001). No device-related complications nor instances of measured subsidence. One patient had a superficial infection, and another had an intraoperatively repaired incidental durotomy. Conclusions: The use of an expandable cage contributed to improvement in both segmental and lumbar lordosis with no reported complications at 24-month follow-up. All clinical measures significantly improved as well. The expandable cage design represents an effective and safe option to increase cage size and allow significant segmental lordosis correction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at 1 Year A Preliminary Report
    Sharma, Amit K.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    Huang, Russel C.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (04): : 242 - 250
  • [42] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable vs Static Titanium Interbody Cages: A Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Huo, Cecilia W.
    Malham, Gregory M.
    Biddau, Dean T.
    Chung, Timothy
    Wang, Yi Yuen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02): : 265 - 275
  • [43] Failure of a polyether-ether-ketone expandable interbody cage following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Stein, Isaac C.
    Than, Khoi D.
    Chen, Kevin S.
    Wang, Anthony C.
    Park, Paul
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 : S555 - S559
  • [44] Failure of a polyether-ether-ketone expandable interbody cage following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Isaac C. Stein
    Khoi D. Than
    Kevin S. Chen
    Anthony C. Wang
    Paul Park
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 555 - 559
  • [45] The Effects of Interbody Device Design and Placement on Lumbar Lordosis and Disc Height in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Wellington, Ian J.
    Kaufman, Caroline R.
    Antonacci, Christopher L.
    Coskun, Ergin
    Cote, Mark P.
    Singh, Hardeep
    Mallozzi, Scott S.
    Moss, Isaac L.
    PROSTHESIS, 2023, 5 (03): : 752 - 762
  • [46] Comparison of the Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Static Cage for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Su, Yu-Hsiang
    Wu, Po-Kuan
    Wu, Meng-Huang
    Wong, Kin-Weng
    Li, Wen-Wei
    Chou, Shih-Hsiang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 179 : 133 - 142
  • [47] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Interbody Fusion
    Stadler, James A., III
    Dandaleh, Nader S.
    Smith, Zachary A.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 25 (02) : 377 - +
  • [48] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion - Clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients
    Potter, BK
    Freedman, BA
    Verwiebe, EG
    Hall, JM
    Polly, DW
    Kuklo, TR
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2005, 18 (04): : 337 - 346
  • [49] RADIOGRAPHIC RESTORATION OF LUMBAR ALIGNMENT AFTER TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION COMMENTS
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    Traynelis, Vincent C.
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 64 (05) : 963 - 964
  • [50] Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Unilateral Versus Bilateral Interbody Cages
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Rush, Augustus J., III
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Singh, Kern
    NEUROSPINE, 2021, 18 (04) : 854 - 862