Primary data share indicator for social life cycle assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Roche, Lindsey [1 ]
Holzapfel, Peter [1 ]
Finkbeiner, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Chair Sustainable Engn, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA); Primary data share (PDS); Site-specific; Company-specific; Data specificity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145051
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) is a methodology to assess social impacts of products and organizations from a life cycle perspective, but data specificity and quality vary, and transparency regarding these aspects is often lacking. The product carbon footprint (PCF) industry initiatives have recently developed the primary data share (PDS) indicator to assess supply chain specificity and encourage primary data usage to better reflect specific emissions. This concept extends to social impacts, where site-specific data better reflects actual social impacts than generic data, which only indicates social risk. To transfer this concept to S-LCA, primary and site-specific data definitions were reviewed from various sustainability guidelines and three indicators were proposed: primary data share (PDSS-LCA), site-specific data share (SDSS-LCA), and company-specific data share (CDSS-LCA). These indicators were then applied to a case study on the foreground system of lithium production in Chile. Differences in the data specificity indicators were seen between the considered stakeholder groups. The Local community surrounding the lithium mining production site had the highest PDS (48%) due to a strong focus on interview-based primary data collection for this stakeholder. The CDS was above 90% for all stakeholder groups due to high data availability for secondary, company-specific data. Overall, the PDSS-LCA was 32%, 50% for SDSS- LCA, and reached 95% for CDSS-LCA. The proposed data specificity indicators were found to be applicable within the case study and increased transparency on data specificity, thereby encouraging increased use of primary and site- or company-specific data to more accurately reflect actual social impacts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The life cycle assessment of a UK data centre
    Whitehead, Beth
    Andrews, Deborah
    Shah, Amip
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (03): : 332 - 349
  • [32] Bridge life cycle assessment with data uncertainty
    Yu-Rong Zhang
    Wen-Jie Wu
    Yuan-Feng Wang
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2016, 21 : 569 - 576
  • [33] Data Mining Approaches for Life Cycle Assessment
    Sundaravaradan, Naren
    Marwah, Manish
    Shah, Amip
    Ramakrishnan, Naren
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2011,
  • [34] Semantic catalogs for life cycle assessment data
    Kuczenski, Brandon
    Davis, Christopher B.
    Rivela, Beatriz
    Janowicz, Krzysztof
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 : 1109 - 1117
  • [35] The life cycle assessment of a UK data centre
    Beth Whitehead
    Deborah Andrews
    Amip Shah
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 332 - 349
  • [36] Bridge life cycle assessment with data uncertainty
    Zhang, Yu-Rong
    Wu, Wen-Jie
    Wang, Yuan-Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (04): : 569 - 576
  • [37] A life cycle method for assessment of a colliery's eco-indicator
    Czaplicka-Kolarz K.
    Wachowicz J.
    Bojarska-Kraus M.
    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2004, 9 (04): : 247 - 253
  • [38] Why life cycle impact assessment is now described as an indicator system
    Owens J.W.
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1999, 4 (2) : 81 - 86
  • [39] Defossilisation assessment of biodiesel life cycle production using the ExROI indicator
    Font de Mora, E.
    Torres, C.
    Valero, A.
    Zambrana, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMODYNAMICS, 2013, 16 (02) : 81 - 86
  • [40] A global life cycle assessment for primary zinc production
    Van Genderen, Eric
    Wildnauer, Maggie
    Santero, Nick
    Sidi, Nadir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (11): : 1580 - 1593