Exploring the delivery of adult vaccination outside of primary care settings: A mixed methods scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Lentakis, Eleftheria [1 ]
Seale, Holly [1 ]
Lazarus, Rajeka [2 ]
Mounier-Jack, Sandra [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Populat Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] UK Hlth Secur Agcy, Severn Pathol, Bristol, England
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
关键词
Vaccines; Vaccination; Secondary care; Tertiary care; Workplace; PNEUMOCOCCAL IMMUNIZATION RATES; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; INCREASING INFLUENZA; INPATIENT INFLUENZA; IMPACT; INTERVENTIONS; FEASIBILITY; ABSENTEEISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126458
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: There are several identified barriers to immunisation delivery and uptake in adults, including governance issues, provider limitations, and patient access. While primary care settings have traditionally been responsible for vaccine delivery, there is a growing need to look to other settings to expand the equitable uptake of vaccinations in adults. Objectives: This scoping review aims to identify and explore the role of non-primary care settings in delivering adult vaccinations, operational barriers and facilitators to immunisation delivery in these settings, and interventions delivered to improve uptake. Methods: This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance for scoping reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Peer-reviewed studies published from 01/01/2010 to 31/12/2022 that focused on the delivery of influenza, COVID-19, pneumococcal and herpes zoster vaccines in adult populations outside of primary care settings were included. Studies were also included if they explored barriers and facilitators to delivery, and interventions to improve uptake. Results: 75 studies were identified for inclusion. Most were quasi-experimental studies, and 58/75 were from the US. Studies were most frequently conducted in in-patient settings, outpatient clinics, nursing homes, and workplaces. Operational planning and logistics, and provider-level issues, such as poor documentation and workflow interruption were commonly identified barriers to delivery. Government funding, continuity of care, and patient convenience were frequently reported facilitators. Interventions shown to improve uptake were operational planning and clinical improvement systems (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] cycles), provider education and reminders, on-site vaccination, patient education, and financial incentives. Conclusions: Mapping of the evidence indicates that adult immunisation delivery may be achievable across tertiary and secondary care settings, as well as non-clinical settings, such as workplaces. There are several identified barriers to delivery, predominantly at the provider-level in tertiary-care settings. Intervention such as operational planning, clinical reminders, and on-site vaccination, may facilitate uptake.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the attitudes and practices of adult service users and providers towards vaccination in non-primary care settings: A mixed methods scoping review
    Lentakis, Eleftheria
    Seale, Holly
    Lazarus, Rajeka
    Mounier-Jack, Sandra
    VACCINE, 2024, 42 (26)
  • [2] Exploring the experience of providing abortion care: a mixed methods scoping review
    Dempsey, B.
    Callaghan, S.
    Higgins, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 128 : 277 - 278
  • [3] Exploring chronic disease prevalence in people with intellectual disabilities in primary care settings: A scoping review
    van den Bemd, Milou
    Cuypers, Maarten
    Bischoff, Erik W. M. A.
    Heutmekers, Marloes
    Schalk, Bianca
    Leusink, Geraline L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2022, 35 (02) : 382 - 398
  • [4] Exploring nurse practitioner practice in Australian rural primary health care settings: A scoping review
    Rossiter, Rachel
    Phillips, Rosemary
    Blanchard, Denise
    van Wissen, Kim
    Robinson, Tracy
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2023, 31 (04) : 617 - 630
  • [5] Building capacity for palliative care delivery in primary care settings Mixed methods evaluation of the INTEGRATE Project
    Evans, Jenna M.
    Mackinnon, Marnie
    Pereira, Jose
    Earle, Craig C.
    Gagnon, Bruno
    Arthurs, Erin
    Gradin, Sharon
    Walton, Tara
    Wright, Frances
    Buchman, Sandy
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2021, 67 (04) : 270 - 278
  • [6] Primary prevention of skin cancer in primary care settings - A scoping review
    Smit, Amelia K.
    Dunlop, Kate
    Singh, Nehal
    Woolley, Nikki
    Damien, Diona L.
    Vuong, Kylie
    Cust, Anne E.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 : 197 - 198
  • [7] Exploring concepts of compassion in care home settings: a scoping review protocol
    Evans, Jay
    Grant, Elizabeth
    Pessi, Anne Birgitta
    Evans, Laura
    Voolma, Silja
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (10):
  • [8] The interface between US primary care clinics and pharmacies for HPV vaccination delivery: A scoping literature review
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Bumatay, Sarah
    Kuo, Grace M.
    Darden, Paul M.
    Hamilton, Andrew
    Fagnan, Lyle J.
    Hatch, Brigit
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2022, 28
  • [9] Caring self-efficacy of direct care workers in residential aged care settings: A mixed methods scoping review
    Shrestha, Sumina
    Alharbi, Rayan J. M.
    Wells, Yvonne
    While, Christine
    Rahman, Muhammad Aziz
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2021, 42 (06) : 1429 - 1445
  • [10] Exploring approaches to contemporary clinical incident analysis methods within acute care settings: a scoping review protocol
    Kynoch, Kathryn
    Liu, Xianliang
    Tan, Jing-Yu
    Shi, Wendan
    Teus, Judeil Krlan
    Ramis, Mary-Anne
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2024, 22 (03) : 505 - 512