Dynamic Decisions of Quality and Goodwill in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Delay Effect

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Yu [1 ]
Liu, Linzhong [1 ]
Li, Wen [1 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Jiaotong Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat, Lanzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
supply chain decision; product quality; goodwill; delay effect; differential game; COORDINATION; DUOPOLY; MODEL; IMPROVEMENT; PLATFORM; POLICIES; PRICE; GAME;
D O I
10.3390/math12233838
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Improving product quality is an effective way for a company to gain goodwill as well as to increase sales. In this paper, the focus is on a two-echelon supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer. Considering the delayed effect of quality improvement on product quality, the differential equations on the levels of quality and goodwill as the state variables are established to explore the impact of delay time on members' strategy inputs, supply chain profits and performance under decentralized and centralized decision models. Additionally, in this paper, how different profit maximization scenarios affect supply chain revenue under decentralized models is examined. The equilibrium solutions are obtained by numerical simulation. The results show that both quality improvement efforts and marketing efforts are decreasing functions of delay time, and the delay effect affects the motivation of supply chain members' strategic inputs. Importantly, supply chain profit under centralized decision is not always higher than that under decentralized decision when the manufacturer's concern degree and delay time are taken into account. The Rubinstein bargaining model is then used to optimize the profit distribution between the manufacturer and the retailer under centralized decision. In this paper, it is also identified that the longer the delay time, the lower the levels of quality and goodwill. The dual effect of delay effect and concern degree will exacerbate the negative impact on the levels of quality and goodwill.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of Coordination Mechanisms in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain
    Cai, Jianhu
    Zhou, Gengui
    Shi, Dan
    IEEE/SOLI'2008: PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE OPERATIONS AND LOGISTICS, AND INFORMATICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 1997 - +
  • [42] An optimal dicisional model in two-echelon supply chain
    Shao, Hongtao
    Li, Yande
    Zhao, Dandan
    CEIS 2011, 2011, 15
  • [43] Queueing System with Inventory for Two-Echelon Supply Chain
    Saffari, Mohammad
    Haji, Rasoul
    CIE: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 835 - 838
  • [44] A Two-Echelon Green Supply Chain for Urban Delivery
    Rossolov, A.
    Lobashov, O.
    Kopytkov, D.
    Botsman, A.
    Lyfenko, S.
    SCIENCE & TECHNIQUE, 2019, 18 (06): : 495 - 503
  • [45] Information sharing and leakage in the two-echelon supply chain
    Wang, Jingru
    Zhen, Zhiyuan
    Yan, Qiang
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 55 : S307 - S325
  • [46] An Inventory Decision Model in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain
    Cai, Jianhu
    Zhou, Gengui
    Xu, Lin
    SEVENTH WUHAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS, VOLS I-III: UNLOCKING THE FULL POTENTIAL OF GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, : 1026 - 1030
  • [47] Sequential game in a two-echelon fuzzy supply chain
    He, Zhen-Rui
    Hong, Mei-Xiang
    Engineering Letters, 2020, 28 (02): : 371 - 381
  • [48] Horizontal collusion in a two-echelon decentralized supply chain
    Zhao, Ju
    Cao, Zong-Hong
    Li, Chang-Wen
    2015 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERVICE SYSTEMS AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT (ICSSSM), 2015,
  • [49] Quality and Pricing Decisions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain with Nash Bargaining Fairness Concerns (vol 2018, 4267305, 2018)
    Li, Ji-cai
    Lu, Jing-hong
    Wang, Qi-liang
    Li, Changwen
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 2018
  • [50] Pricing decisions for substitutable products in a two-echelon supply chain with firms' different channel powers
    Zhao, Jing
    Wei, Jie
    Li, Yongjian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2014, 153 : 243 - 252