Advancing truss structure optimization-A multi-objective weighted average algorithm with enhanced convergence and diversity

被引:1
|
作者
Adalja, Divya [1 ]
Kalita, Kanak [2 ,3 ]
Cepova, Lenka [3 ]
Patel, Pinank [4 ]
Mashru, Nikunj [4 ]
Jangir, Pradeep [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Arpita [9 ]
机构
[1] Marwadi Univ, Dept Math, Rajkot 360003, India
[2] Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Inst Science, Dept Mech Engn, Avadi 600062, India
[3] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Machining Assembly & Engn Metrol, Ostrava 70800, Czech Republic
[4] Marwadi Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Rajkot 360003, India
[5] Chandigarh Univ, Univ Ctr Res & Dev, Mohali 140413, India
[6] Graphic Era Hill Univ, Dept CSE, Dehra Dun 248002, India
[7] Appl Sci Private Univ, Appl Sci Res Ctr, Amman 11931, Jordan
[8] Chitkara Univ, Inst Engn & Technol, Ctr Res Impact & Outcome, Rajpura 140401, Punjab, India
[9] Saveetha Sch Engn, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Dept Biosci, Chennai 602105, India
关键词
Meta-heuristic optimization; Weighted average position; Truss structures; Performance metrics; Multi-objective;
D O I
10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104241
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The challenge of achieving equilibrium between exploration and exploitation stands as a critical barrier in multiobjective metaheuristic optimization when applied to complex engineering problems such as truss structure design. The Multi-Objective Weighted Average Algorithm (MOWAA) presents a new methodology which employs adaptive weighted average position control to optimize population movement for enhanced solution quality. The performance evaluation of MOWAA relies on benchmarking it against five state-of-the-art multiobjective optimization algorithms NSGA-II, MOEA/D, MOLCA, MOEDO and MORIME through eight truss structure optimization problems of increasing complexity. The evaluation of performance relies on three key metrics: Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD) and Spacing (SP). MOWAA demonstrates superior performance compared to competing algorithms through its ability to generate Pareto fronts with higher HV values and lower IGD values and more uniform distribution. The enhanced performance of MOWAA demonstrates its superior capability to efficiently explore the objective space for finding optimal weight-minimization and compliance trade-offs. The robustness of MOWAA is proven through statistical validation with the Friedman rank test which establishes MOWAA as the leading approach with statistically significant advantages. MOWAA demonstrates runtime efficiency throughout truss optimization tasks of varying sizes which enables its practical application for real-world structural optimization problems. MOWAA emerges as a sophisticated and efficient optimization method which demonstrates strong capabilities for engineering applications and computational design.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Hybrid Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems
    Zhang, Song
    Wang, Hongfeng
    Yang, Di
    Huang, Min
    2015 27TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2015, : 1970 - 1974
  • [42] Hyper multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems
    Weian Guo
    Ming Chen
    Lei Wang
    Qidi Wu
    Soft Computing, 2017, 21 : 5883 - 5891
  • [43] Weighted Preferences in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization
    Friedrich, Tobias
    Kroeger, Trent
    Neumann, Frank
    AI 2011: ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 7106 : 291 - +
  • [44] Improved Genetic Algorithm of Multi-objective Structure Fuzzy Optimization
    Lai, Yinan
    Lai, Mingzhu
    You, Bindi
    Dimitrov, Todorov Georgi
    FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 306 - 310
  • [45] Weighted preferences in evolutionary multi-objective optimization
    Friedrich, Tobias
    Kroeger, Trent
    Neumann, Frank
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2013, 4 (02) : 139 - 148
  • [46] Multi-Objective Passing Vehicle Search algorithm for structure optimization
    Kumar, Sumit
    Tejani, Ghanshyam G.
    Pholdee, Nantiwat
    Bureerat, Sujin
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 169
  • [47] Weighted preferences in evolutionary multi-objective optimization
    Tobias Friedrich
    Trent Kroeger
    Frank Neumann
    International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2013, 4 : 139 - 148
  • [48] Kriging-assisted multi-objective optimization algorithm and its convergence assessment
    Zhang J.
    Song M.
    Fang X.
    Deng Y.
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2021, 27 (07): : 2035 - 2044
  • [49] Multi-objective and multi-loading optimization of ultralightweight truss materials
    Liu, JS
    Lu, TJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2004, 41 (3-4) : 619 - 635
  • [50] Enhanced Efficiency in Multi-objective Optimization
    Jiang, Y.
    Deng, S.
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2014, 162 (02) : 577 - 588