A cost-effectiveness analysis of Navina Smart on adult patients affected by neurogenic bowel dysfunction

被引:0
|
作者
Ruggeri, Matteo [1 ,2 ]
Signorini, Alessandro [3 ]
Caravaggio, Silvia [2 ]
Righi, Gabriele [4 ]
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Stat ISTAT, Rome, Italy
[2] UniCamillus Med Univ, Hlth Econ Evaluat HEE Res Unit, Rome, Italy
[3] John Cabot Univ, Dept Business Adm, Rome, Italy
[4] Azienda Ospedaliero Univ Careggi, Florence, Italy
关键词
Cost-effectiveness analysis; Neurogenic bowel dysfunction; Transanal irrigation; TRANSANAL IRRIGATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.33393/grhta.2024.3168
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the economic impact of the device Navina Smart on patients affected by neurogenic bowel dysfunction and dependent on transanal irrigation within the Italian context. This study employs the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. Methods: The analysis was conducted through a Markov model, comparing two scenarios: standard bowel care vs. transanal irrigation. The model operates on a 30-year time period. The results were reported in terms of net monetary benefit. Results: Transanal irrigation therapy was dominant in all scenarios with lower costs and higher effectiveness. The population was assumed to be composed of 1,000 subjects. Setting the willingness to pay at <euro>35,000.00/QALYs (quality-adjusted life years), the analysis yielded a net monetary benefit of <euro>81,087 and cost savings of <euro>66,101 per patient over 30 years. Conclusion: The results of this study substantiate that transanal irrigation therapy treatment employing the Navina Smart device can significantly benefit patients suffering from neurogenic bowel dysfunction by relieving their symptoms. In addition, this therapy offers important cost savings for the Italian National Health Service by reducing resource utilization.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 222
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Stein, Sherman C.
    Malhotra, Neil R.
    Burnett, Mark G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 20 (04) : 474 - 474
  • [42] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    GANIATS, TG
    PRIMARY CARE, 1995, 22 (02): : 307 - 318
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness analysis
    Yates, BT
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2002, 25 (02) : 201 - 202
  • [44] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    BALAKRISHNA, S
    JOURNAL OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 11 (05) : 701 - 703
  • [45] Serological testing for coeliac disease in patients with symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Mein, SM
    Ladabaum, U
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 19 (11) : 1199 - 1210
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for Celiac disease in the adult population
    Shamir, Raanan
    Hernell, Olle
    Leshno, Moshe
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2006, 26 (03) : 282 - 293
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of adult pneumococcal vaccination
    Grabenstein, John D.
    O'Brien, Megan A.
    Chen, Jieling
    VACCINE, 2013, 31 (12) : 1549 - 1549
  • [48] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF REFERRING PATIENTS WITH IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME TO A GASTROENTEROLOGIST IN THE UK
    Canavan, C.
    Card, T.
    West, J.
    Moayyedi, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A625 - A625
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal microbiota transplantation for inflammatory bowel disease
    Zhang, Ting
    Xiang, Jie
    Cui, Bota
    He, Zhi
    Li, Pan
    Chen, Hai
    Xu, Lijuan
    Ji, Guozhong
    Nie, Yongzhan
    Wu, Kaichun
    Fan, Daiming
    Huang, Guangming
    Bai, Jianling
    Zhang, Faming
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (51) : 88894 - 88903
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of endoscopy in irritable bowel syndrome
    Suleiman, S
    Sonnenberg, A
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (03) : 369 - 375