Utility and bias in psychosocial evaluations for transplant listing

Purpose of reviewDisparities in access to transplantation are persistent and pervasive among minoritized populations, and remain incompletely explained by socioeconomic status, insurance, geography, or medical factors. Although much attention has been paid to factors contributing to disparities in organ allocation, fewer studies have focused on barriers to the transplant waitlist. Given increasing calls for equity in organ transplantation, we examine the role of nonmedical factors used in transplant listing decisions, including psychosocial factors like social support, motivation, and knowledge in improving utility in transplant listing decisions, as well as their potential for reinforcing bias.Recent findingsMinoritized groups are more likely to be declined from transplant listing owing to psychosocial criteria. Lack of consistent definitions, screening tools with differential subgroup validity, and insufficient evidence-base contribute to concerns about reliance on psychosocial factors in transplant listing decisions.SummaryImproving consistency and evidence-based approaches in patient evaluation and listing decisions will require greater efforts to identify which psychosocial risk factors are predictive of posttransplant outcomes. Social needs screening presents a strengths-based framework for incorporating psychosocial factors in transplant listing decisions.