Ultrasonography for confirmation of gastric tube placement

被引:0
|
作者
Tsujimoto, Yasushi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kataoka, Yuki [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Banno, Masahiro [3 ,7 ]
Anan, Keisuke [3 ,6 ,8 ]
Shiroshita, Akihiro [3 ,9 ]
Jujo, Satoshi [3 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot & Human Behav, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Oku Med Clin, Osaka, Japan
[3] Sci Res WorkS Peer Support Grp SRWS PSG, Osaka, Japan
[4] Kyoto Min Iren Asukai Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kyoto, Japan
[5] Kyoto Univ, Sect Clin Epidemiol, Dept Community Med, Grad Sch Med, Kyoto, Japan
[6] Kyoto Univ, Dept Healthcare Epidemiol, Grad Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Kyoto, Japan
[7] Seichiryo Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[8] Saiseikai Kumamoto Hosp, Div Resp Med, Kumamoto, Japan
[9] Ichinomiyanishi Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Ichinomiya, Japan
[10] St Lukes Int Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Case-Control Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Intubation; Gastrointestinal; instrumentation; Radiography; Abdominal; Stomach [diagnostic imaging; Ultrasonography; Interventional; Adolescent; Adult; Child; Humans; Middle Aged; NASOGASTRIC FEEDING-TUBE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CORRECT POSITION; ULTRASOUND; VERIFICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; SONOGRAPHY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD012083.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Gastric tubes are commonly used for the administration of drugs and tube feeding for people who are unable to swallow. Feeding via a tube misplaced in the trachea can result in severe pneumonia. Therefore, the confirmation of tube placement in the stomach after tube insertion is important. Recent studies have reported that ultrasonography provides good diagnostic accuracy estimates in the confirmation of appropriate tube placement. Hence, ultrasound could provide a promising alternative to X-rays in the confirmation of tube placement, especially in settings where X-ray facilities are unavailable or difficult to access. Objectives To assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound alone or in combination with other methods for gastric tube placement confirmation in children and adults. Search methods This systematic review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review. For this update, we searched the Cochrane Library (2021, Issue 6), MEDLINE (to April 2023), Embase (to April 2023), five other databases (to July 2021), and reference lists of articles, and contacted study authors. Selection criteria We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of naso- and orogastric tube placement confirmed by ultrasound visualization using X-ray visualization as the reference standard. We included cross-sectional studies and case-control studies. We excluded case series or case reports. We excluded studies if X-ray visualization was not the reference standard or if the tube being placed was a gastrostomy or enteric tube. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed the methodological quality and extracted data from each of the included studies. We contacted the authors of the included studies to obtain missing data. There were sparse data for specificity. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of only sensitivity using a univariate random-effects logistic regression model to combine data from studies that used the same method and echo window. Main results We identified 12 new studies in addition to 10 studies included in the earlier version of this review, totalling 1939 participants and 1944 tube insertions. Overall, we judged the risk of bias in the included studies as low or unclear. No study was at low risk of bias or low concern for applicability in every QUADAS-2 domain. There were limited data (152 participants) for misplacement detection (specificity) due to the low incidence of misplacement. The summary sensitivity of ultrasound on neck and abdomen echo windows were 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 0.98; moderate-certainty evidence) for air injection and 0.98 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00; moderate-certainty evidence) for saline injection. The summary sensitivity of ultrasound on abdomen echo window was 0.96 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.00; very low-certainty evidence) for air injection and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99; moderate-certainty evidence) for procedures without injection. The certainty of evidence for specificity across all methods was very low due to the very small sample size. For settings where X-ray was not readily available and participants underwent gastric tube insertion for drainage (8 studies, 552 participants), sensitivity estimates of ultrasound in combination with other confirmatory tests ranged from 0.86 to 0.98 and specificity estimates of 1.00 with wide CIs. For studies of ultrasound alone (9 studies, 782 participants), sensitivity estimates ranged from 0.77 to 0.98 and specificity estimates were 1.00 with wide CIs or not estimable due to no occurrence of misplacement. Authors' conclusions Of 22 studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of gastric tube placement, few studies had a low risk of bias. Based on limited evidence, ultrasound does not have sufficient accuracy as a single test to confirm gastric tube placement. However, in settings where X-ray is not readily available, ultrasound may be useful to detect misplaced gastric tubes. Larger studies are needed to determine the possibility of adverse events when ultrasound is used to confirm tube placement.
引用
收藏
页数:99
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE PLACEMENT CONFIRMATION BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF MORE THAN 2500 PATIENTS
    Sahu, Ankit Kumar
    Bhoi, Sanjeev
    Aggarwal, Praveen
    Mathew, Roshan
    Nayer, Jamshed
    Amrithanand, V. T.
    Mishra, Prakash Ranjan
    Sinha, Tej Prakash
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (02): : 254 - 264
  • [32] Reply to Letter: Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Chou, Hao-Chang
    Lien, Wan-Ching
    Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming
    RESUSCITATION, 2014, 85 (01) : E11 - E11
  • [33] An assessment of a tracheal tube introducer as an endotracheal tube placement confirmation device
    Bair, AE
    Laurin, EG
    Schmitt, BJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (06): : 754 - 758
  • [34] Ultrasonographic confirmation of endotracheal tube placement in a porcine model
    Broderick, J
    Stutz, SJ
    Keville, E
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2003, 42 (04) : S14 - S14
  • [35] Flexion test for confirmation of tracheal tube placement in paediatrics
    Vas, L
    Lim, SL
    Goel, S
    PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 12 (06): : 561 - 562
  • [36] Placement confirmation of Sengstaken-Blakemore tube by ultrasound
    Lin, A. C-M
    Hsu, Y-H
    Wang, T-L
    Chong, C-F
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (06) : 487 - 487
  • [37] Confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation
    Xue, F. S.
    Liao, X.
    Wang, Q.
    RESUSCITATION, 2012, 83 (03) : E67 - E67
  • [38] Confirmation of correct tracheal tube placement in newborn infants
    Schmoelzera, Georg M.
    O'Reilly, Megan
    Davis, Peter G.
    Cheung, Po-Yin
    Roehr, Charles Christoph
    RESUSCITATION, 2013, 84 (06) : 731 - 737
  • [39] Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound for Confirmation of Endotracheal Tube Placement
    Long, Brit
    Koyfman, Alex
    Gottlieb, Michael
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 26 (09) : 1096 - 1098
  • [40] First do no harm: nasogastric tube placement and confirmation
    Walsh, S. M.
    Gallagher, A.
    Gallagher, R.
    Barnes, E.
    Doherty, G. A.
    Dodd, J. D.
    Butler, M. W.
    QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 109 (03) : 219 - 219