Ultrasonography for confirmation of gastric tube placement

被引:0
|
作者
Tsujimoto, Yasushi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kataoka, Yuki [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Banno, Masahiro [3 ,7 ]
Anan, Keisuke [3 ,6 ,8 ]
Shiroshita, Akihiro [3 ,9 ]
Jujo, Satoshi [3 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Promot & Human Behav, Kyoto, Japan
[2] Oku Med Clin, Osaka, Japan
[3] Sci Res WorkS Peer Support Grp SRWS PSG, Osaka, Japan
[4] Kyoto Min Iren Asukai Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kyoto, Japan
[5] Kyoto Univ, Sect Clin Epidemiol, Dept Community Med, Grad Sch Med, Kyoto, Japan
[6] Kyoto Univ, Dept Healthcare Epidemiol, Grad Sch Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Kyoto, Japan
[7] Seichiryo Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[8] Saiseikai Kumamoto Hosp, Div Resp Med, Kumamoto, Japan
[9] Ichinomiyanishi Hosp, Dept Resp Med, Ichinomiya, Japan
[10] St Lukes Int Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Case-Control Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Intubation; Gastrointestinal; instrumentation; Radiography; Abdominal; Stomach [diagnostic imaging; Ultrasonography; Interventional; Adolescent; Adult; Child; Humans; Middle Aged; NASOGASTRIC FEEDING-TUBE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CORRECT POSITION; ULTRASOUND; VERIFICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; SONOGRAPHY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD012083.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Gastric tubes are commonly used for the administration of drugs and tube feeding for people who are unable to swallow. Feeding via a tube misplaced in the trachea can result in severe pneumonia. Therefore, the confirmation of tube placement in the stomach after tube insertion is important. Recent studies have reported that ultrasonography provides good diagnostic accuracy estimates in the confirmation of appropriate tube placement. Hence, ultrasound could provide a promising alternative to X-rays in the confirmation of tube placement, especially in settings where X-ray facilities are unavailable or difficult to access. Objectives To assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound alone or in combination with other methods for gastric tube placement confirmation in children and adults. Search methods This systematic review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review. For this update, we searched the Cochrane Library (2021, Issue 6), MEDLINE (to April 2023), Embase (to April 2023), five other databases (to July 2021), and reference lists of articles, and contacted study authors. Selection criteria We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of naso- and orogastric tube placement confirmed by ultrasound visualization using X-ray visualization as the reference standard. We included cross-sectional studies and case-control studies. We excluded case series or case reports. We excluded studies if X-ray visualization was not the reference standard or if the tube being placed was a gastrostomy or enteric tube. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed the methodological quality and extracted data from each of the included studies. We contacted the authors of the included studies to obtain missing data. There were sparse data for specificity. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of only sensitivity using a univariate random-effects logistic regression model to combine data from studies that used the same method and echo window. Main results We identified 12 new studies in addition to 10 studies included in the earlier version of this review, totalling 1939 participants and 1944 tube insertions. Overall, we judged the risk of bias in the included studies as low or unclear. No study was at low risk of bias or low concern for applicability in every QUADAS-2 domain. There were limited data (152 participants) for misplacement detection (specificity) due to the low incidence of misplacement. The summary sensitivity of ultrasound on neck and abdomen echo windows were 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 0.98; moderate-certainty evidence) for air injection and 0.98 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00; moderate-certainty evidence) for saline injection. The summary sensitivity of ultrasound on abdomen echo window was 0.96 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.00; very low-certainty evidence) for air injection and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99; moderate-certainty evidence) for procedures without injection. The certainty of evidence for specificity across all methods was very low due to the very small sample size. For settings where X-ray was not readily available and participants underwent gastric tube insertion for drainage (8 studies, 552 participants), sensitivity estimates of ultrasound in combination with other confirmatory tests ranged from 0.86 to 0.98 and specificity estimates of 1.00 with wide CIs. For studies of ultrasound alone (9 studies, 782 participants), sensitivity estimates ranged from 0.77 to 0.98 and specificity estimates were 1.00 with wide CIs or not estimable due to no occurrence of misplacement. Authors' conclusions Of 22 studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of gastric tube placement, few studies had a low risk of bias. Based on limited evidence, ultrasound does not have sufficient accuracy as a single test to confirm gastric tube placement. However, in settings where X-ray is not readily available, ultrasound may be useful to detect misplaced gastric tubes. Larger studies are needed to determine the possibility of adverse events when ultrasound is used to confirm tube placement.
引用
收藏
页数:99
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasonography for confirmation of gastric tube placement
    Tsujimoto, Hiraku
    Tsujimoto, Yasushi
    Nakata, Yukihiko
    Akazawa, Mai
    Kataoka, Yuki
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (04):
  • [2] Bedside ultrasonography for the confirmation of gastric tube placement in the neonate
    Atalay, Yunus Oktay
    Polat, Ahmet Veysel
    Ozkan, Elif Ozyazici
    Tomak, Leman
    Aygun, Canan
    Tobias, Joseph Drew
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 13 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [3] CONFIRMATION OF TRANSPYLORIC FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT BY ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    GREENBERG, M
    BEJAR, R
    ASSER, S
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1993, 122 (03): : 413 - 415
  • [4] A New Formula for Confirmation of Proper Endotracheal Tube Placement with Ultrasonography
    Akhgar, Atousa
    Bahrami, Shamim
    Mohammadinejad, Payam
    Khazaeipour, Zahra
    Hossein-Nejad, Hooman
    ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 3 (03)
  • [5] Ultrasound Confirmation of Gastric Tube Placement: A Novel Method
    Radulescu, Vlad
    Ahmad, Sahar
    CHEST, 2015, 148 (04)
  • [6] The Use of Ultrasonography for Verifying Gastric Tube Placement in Newborns
    Barbosa Dias, Flavia de Souza
    Alvares, Beatriz Regina
    Jales, Rodrigo Menezes
    Vicente Franco, Aline Patricia
    Fabri da Silva, Jessica Emile
    Silva Fabene, Suelen Mara
    de Siqueira Caldas, Jamil Pedro
    Carmona, Elenice Valentim
    ADVANCES IN NEONATAL CARE, 2019, 19 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [7] Confirmation of Gastric Tube Bedside Placement With the Sky Blue Method
    Imamura, Takashi
    Maeda, Hajime
    Kinoshita, Hidetoshi
    Shibukawa, Yasuko
    Suda, Kiyomi
    Fukuda, Yutaka
    Goto, Aya
    Nagasawa, Katsutoshi
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 29 (01) : 125 - 130
  • [8] Accuracy of the combined method (auscultation and pH measurement) and ultrasonography for confirmation of gastric tube placement: a study protocol for a prospective study
    Godinho Rigobello, Mayara Carvalho
    Elias Junior, Jorge
    Grespan Bonacim, Carlos Alberto
    de Campos Pereira Silveira, Renata Cristina
    Bonardi, Fernanda Caroline
    Nunes, Roosevelt Santos
    Pereira, Rosana Aparecida
    Escobar Gimenes, Fernanda Raphael
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (09): : e036033
  • [9] Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chou, Eric H.
    Dickman, Eitan
    Tsou, Po-Yang
    Tessaro, Mark
    Tsai, Yang-Ming
    Ma, Matthew Huei-Ming
    Lee, Chien-Chang
    Marshall, John
    RESUSCITATION, 2015, 90 : 97 - 103
  • [10] Ultrasonography for confirmation of emergency department endotracheal tube placement: a meta-analysis
    Chen, W. -T.
    Wang, M. -Y.
    Wang, H. -Y.
    Tang, M.
    Zhang, K.
    Zhang, G. -S.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (18) : 8384 - 8396