Comparison of dynamic hip screw with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system internal fixation for the treatment of garden II-IV type femoral neck fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Hong, Haisen [1 ]
Sha, Mo [1 ]
Chen, Zhangxin [1 ]
Li, Yanwei [1 ]
Kang, Liangqi [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Hosp 909, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Femoral neck fractures; Garden II-IV classification; dynamic hip screw (DHS); anti-rotation screw; femoral neck system (FNS); internal fixation;
D O I
10.3233/THC-231547
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Femoral neck fractures, which are fractures occurring from the femoral head to the base of the femoral neck, are prevalent in the elderly population. With the progression of societal aging, the incidence of femoral neck fractures has been steadily increasing, making it a significant global issue that urgently needs to be addressed. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of dynamic hip screw (DHS) with anti-rotation screw and femoral neck system (FNS) internal fixation for the treatment of Garden II-IV type femoral neck fractures. METHODS: A total of 90 patients with Garden II-IV type femoral neck fractures were randomly assigned to either the control group (n = 45) treated with DHS and anti-rotation screw or the experimental group (n = 45) treated with FNS. Surgical outcomes, including incision size, blood loss, operation time, fluoroscopy frequency, and fracture healing time, were compared. Postoperative complication rates, reoperation rates, Harris scores, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were also assessed. RESULTS: The experimental group demonstrated significantly reduced incision length, blood loss, operation time, and fluoroscopy frequency compared to the control group (P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in fracture healing time, Garden classification, or fracture reduction outcomes between the two groups (P > 0.05). At 6 months post-treatment, both groups showed significant improvements in Harris scores and VAS scores compared to pre-treatment (P < 0.05), with no significant differences between the groups (P > 0.05). The rates of internal fixation failure, nonunion, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head, as well as overall incidence of postoperative complications and reoperation rates, showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both DHS with anti-rotation screw and FNS internal fixation demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of Garden II-IV type femoral neck fractures. The experimental group showed advantages in terms of reduced incision length, blood loss, operation time, and fluoroscopy frequency, while maintaining similar clinical outcomes and complication rates.
引用
收藏
页码:4009 / 4017
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Addition of an Anti-rotation Screw to the Dynamic Hip Screw for Femoral Neck Fractures
    Makki, Daoud
    Mohamed, Ahmed M.
    Gadiyar, Rajeev
    Patterson, Marc
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 36 (07) : E865 - E868
  • [2] Internal Fixation of Garden Type III Femoral Neck Fractures with Sliding Hip Screw and Anti-Rotation Screw: Does Increased Valgus Improve Healing?
    Hackl, Simon
    von Rueden, Christian
    Weisemann, Ferdinand
    Kloepfer-Kraemer, Isabella
    Stuby, Fabian M.
    Hoegel, Florian
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (11):
  • [3] Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in basicervical femoral neck fractures
    Jun-Ki Moon
    Jung Il Lee
    Kyu-Tae Hwang
    Jae-Hyuk Yang
    Ye-Soo Park
    Ki-Chul Park
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [4] Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in basicervical femoral neck fractures
    Moon, Jun-Ki
    Lee, Jung Il
    Hwang, Kyu-Tae
    Yang, Jae-Hyuk
    Park, Ye-Soo
    Park, Ki-Chul
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [5] Is new always better: comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures
    Konrad Schuetze
    Jakob Burkhardt
    Carlos Pankratz
    Alexander Eickhoff
    Alexander Boehringer
    Christina Degenhart
    Florian Gebhard
    Raffael Cintean
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 3155 - 3161
  • [6] Is new always better: comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in the treatment of femoral neck fractures
    Schuetze, Konrad
    Burkhardt, Jakob
    Pankratz, Carlos
    Eickhoff, Alexander
    Boehringer, Alexander
    Degenhart, Christina
    Gebhard, Florian
    Cintean, Raffael
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (06) : 3155 - 3161
  • [7] Biomechanical Comparison of Dynamic Hip Screw, Proximal Femoral Nail, Cannulated Screw, and Monoaxial External Fixation in the Treatment of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures
    Imren, Y.
    Gurkan, V.
    Bilsel, K.
    Desteli, E. E.
    Tuna, M.
    Gurcan, C.
    Tuncay, I.
    Sen, C.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2015, 82 (02) : 140 - 144
  • [8] Osteosynthesis of Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures by Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) Fixation
    Majernicek, M.
    Dungl, P.
    Kolman, J.
    Malkus, T.
    Vaculik, J.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2009, 76 (04) : 319 - 325
  • [9] Efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and dynamic hip screw internal fixation in the treatment of hip fracture in the elderly patients
    Chen, Kang
    Chen, Shenghao
    Yi, Jianhua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (04): : 4188 - 4192
  • [10] Internal fixation system with the pyramid screw head for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures
    Wang, Songyuan
    Deng, Xuan
    Zhong, Hao
    Ma, Lei
    Wang, Xiyu
    Lou, Xinqi
    Fan, Xuanze
    Duan, Wangping
    Zhang, Kai
    Li, Pengcui
    Wei, Xiaochun
    Zhao, Yongwang
    Wang, Yanqin
    Wu, Xiaogang
    Xue, Yanru
    Chen, Weiyi
    ACTA MECHANICA SINICA, 2023, 39 (08)