Life cycle assessment and cost analysis of LC3 concrete considering sustainability and uncertainty

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Xiaoxu [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Zichun [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Yingwu [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Biao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Durabil Marine Civil Engn, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Limestone calcined clay cement; Life cycle assessment; Cost analysis; Sustainability; Uncertainty; CALCINED CLAY CEMENT; RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE; CARBON-DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; IMPACT; CONSTRUCTION; INVENTORY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2025.111960
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Finding sustainable alternatives to conventional concrete is crucial for mitigating the remarkable contribution of the construction sector to global resource consumption and carbon dioxide emissions. Based on limestone calcined clay cement (LC3), recycled coarse aggregate (RCA), seawater, and sea sand, a type of low-carbon concrete was developed recently. To further verify the environmentally friendly advantage of the new concrete (i.e., LC3 concrete), a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) and cost analysis were conducted in this study, considering sustainability and uncertainty. Focusing on the "cradle-to-gate" scope, an integrated LCA model was proposed, and the life cycle sustainable cost (LCSC) was evaluated for LC3 concrete through the monetization of the environmental impacts (i.e., global warming potential, abiotic depletion potential-fossil fuels, acidification potential, eutrophication potential, and photochemical ozone creation potential). In addition, to reflect the variability and uncertainty associated with activities in the whole life cycle, a probabilistic assessment of LCA and cost is conducted combined with the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). The deterministic results show that the environmental cost of LC3 concrete accounts for 21%-24 % of the corresponding LCSC, and the LCSC of LC3 concrete was reduced by 14%-29 % compared to conventional concrete, indicating a significant sustainable advantage. Probabilistic analysis results indicate that the environmental impacts, economic benefits and sustainability of LC3 concrete are superior to those of conventional concrete with a probability of 80%-100 %. Overall, LC3 concrete demonstrates significant potential to reduce environmental impacts and economic burdens, providing a promising path for sustainable development in construction materials.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incorporating uncertainty into life-cycle sustainability assessment of pavement alternatives
    Zheng, Xiaoyan
    Easa, Said M.
    Ji, Tao
    Jiang, Zhenliang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 264
  • [22] Effect of silica fume and PCE-HPMC on LC3 mortar: Microstructure, statistical optimization and life cycle Assessment
    Bhandari, Ishan
    Kumar, Rajesh
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2023, 403
  • [23] Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Model for Concrete Bridge Deck Applications
    Kendall, Alissa
    Keoleian, Gregory A.
    Helfand, Gloria E.
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2008, 14 (03) : 214 - 222
  • [24] Life cycle sustainability assessment analysis of different concrete construction techniques for residential building in Malaysia
    Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard
    Sher, Willy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (07): : 1301 - 1318
  • [25] A review of sustainability assessment of geopolymer concrete through AI-based life cycle analysis
    V. Ramesh
    B. Muthramu
    D. Rebekhal
    AI in Civil Engineering, 2025, 4 (1):
  • [26] Life cycle sustainability assessment analysis of different concrete construction techniques for residential building in Malaysia
    Ali Tighnavard Balasbaneh
    Willy Sher
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1301 - 1318
  • [27] Quantitative Models for Life-Cycle Sustainability Cost of Concrete Bridge Structures
    Wu, Kexian
    Jin, Weiliang
    He, Xiaoyu
    Huang, Yuelin
    Fan, Xuehua
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tongji University, 2024, 52 (10): : 1527 - 1536
  • [28] Can Precise Irrigation Support the Sustainability of Protected Cultivation? A Life-Cycle Assessment and Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
    Canaj, Kledja
    Parente, Angelo
    D'Imperio, Massimiliano
    Boari, Francesca
    Buono, Vito
    Toriello, Michele
    Mehmeti, Andi
    Montesano, Francesco Fabiano
    WATER, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [29] Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Buildings: A Scientometric Analysis
    Poderyte, Ieva
    Banaitiene, Nerija
    Banaitis, Audrius
    BUILDINGS, 2025, 15 (03)
  • [30] Life cycle sustainability assessment
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (04): : 373 - 376