OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF UROLOGY and OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CONFEDERATION OF UROLOGY

Introduction: Telesurgery allows the procedures to be carried out over long distances, however due to lack of data, its feasibility has not been consolidated yet. Since it is a promising modality, it is important to illustrate the current scenario on this subject. Objective: To review the literature aiming at the surgical success rate as a primary objective, and secondly, the most important patient outcomes and the network system. Materials and Methods: In June 2024, we followed PRISMA guidelines to research trials on urological robotic surgery in humans. We used as exclusion criteria: editorials, specialist's opinions, tele-mentoring, tele-training, small procedures, non-remote surgeries, absence of interest outcomes, telesurgeries in non-humans or in cadaver. Results: Five hundred and ninety eight studies were identified with peer review and a third reviewer for divergencies, both directed by previously established inclusion and exclusion criteria, selecting 6 studies after the exclusions. We found 54 patients who underwent urological telesurgeries; all of them were accomplished with no complications or need for conversion to open surgery. Almost all the procedures were carried out in China (98.14%) and the most used robotic model was MicroHand S (83.33%). Nephrectomy was the procedure of choice (57%). Mean surgical time was 66.2 (IQR) 56.6 minutes. Intraoperative bleeding time was 68.6 +/- 76.7 milliliters. Hospital stay was 5.5 (IQR) 5 days. The distance between main surgeon and the patient was between 2,581.5 (IQR) 2,871 kilometers. 5G network was used the most (98.14%). The total network latency time was 176 (IQR) 10.9 milliseconds. Conclusion: Despite its limitations, there was evidence demonstrating that robotic surgery in the genitourinary system is safe and feasible, however it is a subject that must be well discussed, and further studies must be carried out.