Cooperative multi-actor multi-criteria optimization framework for process integration

被引:0
|
作者
Lechtenberg, Fabian [1 ]
Areste-Salo, Lluc [1 ]
Espuna, Antonio [1 ]
Graells, Moises
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Chem Engn, EEBE, Av Eduard Maristany 16, Barcelona 08019, Spain
关键词
Decision support; Resource efficiency; Multi-objective optimization; GAME-THEORY; SYSTEMATIC ALLOCATION; HEAT INTEGRATION; ENERGY-SYSTEMS; ANALYSIS MAMCA; BENEFITS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124581
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Paradigm shifts towards sustainable production systems, as intended by industrial symbiosis and circular economy solutions, require multi-criteria decision-making and consensus among resource-sharing actors, yet a structured methodology for balancing diverse company preferences in such integrated process systems remains absent. This paper introduces the Process Integration Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Optimization (PI-MAMCO) framework, which builds upon heuristic principles for the solution of multi-actor multi-criteria situations, while incorporating holistic optimization and cooperative game theory techniques, specifically tailored for addressing PI challenges. For the first time, multiple criteria benefits are allocated simultaneously, and the consequences on stability are discussed. The method is demonstrated in a palm oil complex, integrating a mill, a combined heat and power plant, and a refinery to efficiently manage effluents and generate utilities for internal use or sale. Goal programming yields stable coalitional benefits of 5.7 million USD and 41.0 kt CO2e 2 e per year, allowing fair benefit allocation among participants without any party incurring a loss in any criterion. This demonstrates how PI-MAMCO enables stakeholders in the process industry to propose binding intercompany collaboration contracts by harmonizing the perspectives of involved actors, identifying agreements impractical to achieve otherwise. However, unstable regions for certain preference articulations are identified, and examples for unstable allocations using the often employed Shapley value and the Maali's method are given.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-criteria optimization in industry
    Karl-Heinz Küfer
    Kaisa Miettinen
    Stefan Ruzika
    Serpil Sayin
    OR Spectrum, 2022, 44 : 303 - 305
  • [42] Understanding resistance to digital surveillance Towards a multi-disciplinary, multi-actor framework
    Martin, Aaron
    van Brakel, Rosamunde
    Bernhard, Daniel
    SURVEILLANCE & SOCIETY, 2009, 6 (03) : 213 - 232
  • [43] A unifying framework for multi-criteria fluence map optimization models
    Romeijn, HE
    Dempsey, JF
    Li, JG
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (10): : 1991 - 2013
  • [44] Selection of policy actions for e-commerce last-mile delivery in cities: An online multi-actor multi-criteria evaluation
    Boggio-Marzet, Alessandra
    Villa-Martinez, Rafael
    Monzon, Andres
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2023, 142 : 15 - 27
  • [45] A social stakeholder support assessment of low-carbon transport policy based on multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: The case of Tianjin
    Sun, Hui
    Zhang, Yiting
    Wang, Yuning
    Li, Lei
    Sheng, Yun
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2015, 41 : 103 - 116
  • [46] GIS-AHP Ensembles for Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Site Selection Processes: Application to Groundwater Management under Climate Change
    Scheihing, Konstantin W.
    Kuebeck, Christine
    Suetering, Uwe
    WATER, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [47] Collaborative decision-making in sustainable mobility: identifying possible consensuses in the multi-actor multi-criteria analysis based on inverse mixed-integer linear optimization
    Huang, He
    De Smet, Yves
    Macharis, Cathy
    Doan, Nguyen Anh Vu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01): : 64 - 74
  • [48] Elaborating a Knowledge Management Plan: A Multi-actor Decision Process
    Tounkara, Thierno
    BEST PRACTICES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY: KNOWLEDGE, LEARNING, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY FOR ALL, 2009, 49 : 305 - 318
  • [49] Multi-criteria Optimization of an Industrial World-Scale Process
    von Kurnatowski, Martin
    Bortz, Michael
    Scherrer, Alexander
    Hoffmann, Anna
    Lorenz, Hilke-Marie
    Caraucan, Miguel
    Gruetzner, Thomas
    Kuenzle, Niklaus
    Kuefer, Karl-Heinz
    CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2017, 89 (11) : 1471 - 1478
  • [50] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20