Investors personality correlates with sustainability preferences in investment - A choice experiment with Spanish investors

被引:0
|
作者
Munoz-Munoz, E. [1 ]
Crespo-Cebada, E. [2 ]
Miron-Sanguino, A. S. [3 ]
Diaz-Caro, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremadura, Dept Direcc Empresas & Sociol, Badajoz, Spain
[2] Univ Extremadura, Dept Econ Aplicada, Badajoz, Spain
[3] Univ Extremadura, Dept Econ Financiera & Contabil, Caceres, Spain
关键词
Personalities; Choice experiment; Behavioral finance; Risk; Sustainability; SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT; FINANCIAL DECISION-MAKING; TRAITS; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; BEHAVIOR; RISK; OVERCONFIDENCE; INTELLIGENCE; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2024.102332
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
According to behavioral economics, investors' decisions are influenced by factors beyond rational reasoning, such as an investor's personality. This paper explores the relationships between personality, using the Big Five personality traits framework, and the willingness to invest in assets that contribute to achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs), more specifically, sustainable finances. The study also analyzes the relationship between personality traits and risk aversion. To this end, 1,357 investors in Spain were surveyed through an online questionnaire combining a choice experiment and a personality assessment. The main conclusion of our study is that personality traits are associated with the characteristics of investment products preferred by the sampled investors.. This relationship is quantified through the analysis of a willingness to pay (WTP) for various investment attributes. While all personality traits are linked to risk aversion and a willingness to invest in sustainable companies, our WTP analysis highlights differences in the extent to which investors are willing to forgo profitability to contribute to the SDGs. Although we find heterogeneous behavior among investors, the agreeableness trait emerges as the most concerned with sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Toward enhanced excellence in Brazilian investment firms: the role of investors' personality assessment tools
    Frantz, Adriana
    Olivo, Rodolfo Leandro de Faria
    Sales, George Andre Willrich
    Silva, Fabiana
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2022, 29 (03) : 856 - 877
  • [22] The Impact of COVID-19 on Investors' Investment Intention of Sustainability-Related Investment: Evidence from China
    Xu, Xin
    Xie, Yi
    Xiong, Feng
    Li, Yan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [23] Preferences for lamb meat: A choice experiment for Spanish consumers
    Gracia, Azucena
    de-Magistris, Tiziana
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2013, 95 (02) : 396 - 402
  • [24] To label or not? A choice experiment testing whether labelled green bonds matter to retail investors
    Saravade, Vasundhara
    Weber, Olaf
    Vitalis, Adam
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 12 (01):
  • [25] Climate Information in Retail Investors' Decision-Making: Evidence From a Choice Experiment
    Bassen, Alexander
    Goedker, Katrin
    Luedeke-Freund, Florian
    Oll, Josua
    ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 32 (01) : 62 - 82
  • [26] WHY DO RETAIL INVESTORS MAKE COSTLY MISTAKES? AN EXPERIMENT ON MUTUAL FUND CHOICE
    Fisch, Jill E.
    Wilkinson-Ryan, Tess
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 2014, 162 (03) : 605 - 647
  • [27] Role of Foreign and Domestic Institutional Investors in Corporate Sustainability: Focusing on R&D Investment
    Shin, Ilhang
    Park, Sorah
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 13
  • [28] Are type B investors efficacious? Exploring role of personality in ambidextrous investment decision-making
    Misra, Rupali
    Srivastava, Sumita
    Banwet, D. K.
    DECISION, 2019, 46 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [29] Are type B investors efficacious? Exploring role of personality in ambidextrous investment decision-making
    Rupali Misra
    Sumita Srivastava
    D. K. Banwet
    DECISION, 2019, 46 : 27 - 34
  • [30] The Choice Architecture of Sustainable and Responsible Investment: Nudging Investors Toward Ethical Decision-Making
    Herwig Pilaj
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2017, 140 : 743 - 753