A Comprehensive Evaluation of Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms for Sepsis Prediction: A Comparative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kaur, Narinder [1 ]
Kaur, Arvinder [2 ]
机构
[1] Chandigarh Univ, Comp Sci & Engn, Gharuan, Mohali, India
[2] Chandigarh Univ, UITHM, Gharuan, Mohali, India
关键词
component; formatting; style; styling; insert;
D O I
10.1109/ICOICI62503.2024.10696647
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Sepsis is still a big problem in health care, and it can be hard to spot and treat on time. Traditional ways of spotting sepsis aren't always good enough to make a quick diagnosis, so new ways are being looked into. Since it becomes a big health issue, hospital expenditures is increasing with time span. Machine learning, branch of Artificial Intelligence, has become a useful way to find sepsis. This study focuses on detecting sepsis using several machine learning models. There are six different models used, including logistic regression(LR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (Random Forest), LGboost, Adaboost and XGBoost. The performance of the models is assessed using various evaluation metrics and comparison has been made. The experimental results demonstrate that the Random Forest, LGBoost and XGBoost model are the best imputation approach for predicting the disease's early stage with an accuracy of 77.5%,74.2% and 74.2% respectively. These are suitable for machine learning applications and is especially useful when dealing with complex and high-dimensional data-sets.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 919
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for prediction of trabeculectomy outcomes
    Zanabli, Ahmed Amer
    Ul Banna, Hasan
    McMillan, Brian
    Lehmann, Maria
    Gupta, Sumeet
    Palko, Joel R.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [32] Loan Repayment Prediction Using Logistic Regression Ensemble Learning With Machine Learning Algorithms
    Dinh, Thuan Nguyen
    Thanh, Binh Pham
    2022 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING & MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, ISCMI, 2022, : 79 - 85
  • [33] Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms-A comparative study
    Granata, Francesco
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 217 : 303 - 315
  • [34] Machine learning algorithms for diabetes detection: a comparative evaluation of performance of algorithms
    Saxena, Surabhi
    Mohapatra, Debashish
    Padhee, Subhransu
    Sahoo, Goutam Kumar
    EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 16 (02) : 587 - 603
  • [35] Machine learning algorithms for diabetes detection: a comparative evaluation of performance of algorithms
    Surabhi Saxena
    Debashish Mohapatra
    Subhransu Padhee
    Goutam Kumar Sahoo
    Evolutionary Intelligence, 2023, 16 : 587 - 603
  • [36] CHURN PREDICTION - A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS
    Gangadharan, Chika K.
    Alex, Roshni
    Sabu, M. K.
    ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 20 (12): : 3049 - 3060
  • [37] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms to Urban Traffic Prediction
    Lee, Yong-Ju
    Min, Okgee
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY CONVERGENCE (ICTC), 2017, : 1034 - 1036
  • [38] Machine Learning Algorithms for Transportation Mode Prediction: A Comparative Analysis
    Murrar S.
    Alhaj F.
    Qutqut M.H.
    Informatica (Slovenia), 2024, 48 (06): : 117 - 130
  • [39] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for CKD Risk Prediction
    Yang, Weilin
    Ahmed, Nasim
    Barczak, Andre L. C.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 171205 - 171220
  • [40] A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS FOR IPO UNDERPERFORMANCE PREDICTION
    Sonsare, Pravinkumar M.
    Pande, Ashtavinayak
    Kumar, Sudhanshu
    Kurve, Akshay
    Shanbhag, Chinmay
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 2023, 5 (06):