Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Amyloid-β Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Alzheimer's Disease: A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Fang [1 ]
Cheng, Jiang [1 ]
Jin, Kaihui [1 ]
Zhao, Li [1 ]
Li, Junyong [1 ]
Wu, Jia [1 ]
Ren, Xiaolu [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ningxia Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Yinchuan, Peoples R China
[2] Ningxia Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Yinchuan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Hlth Sci, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
来源
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | 2024年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; amyloid-beta; magnetic resonance imaging; positron emission tomography; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; STRUCTURAL MRI; PET; F-18-FLUTEMETAMOL; CLASSIFICATION; PREDICTION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.70111
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative diagnostic performance of amyloid-beta positron emission tomography (A beta PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: An extensive search was conducted in the PubMed and Embase databases to identify available publications up to December 2023. Head-to-head comparative studies were included if they evaluated the diagnostic performance of A beta PET and MRI in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method, followed by transformation via the Freeman-Tukey double inverse sine transformation. Results: Six articles involving 560 patients were included in the meta-analysis. When distinguishing AD from mild cognitive impairment (MCI), both methods showed comparable sensitivity (A beta PET: 0.71, MRI: 0.62) and specificity (A beta PET: 0.68, MRI: 0.69), with no statistically significant differences observed (p = 0.34 and 0.99). When identifying AD from normal cognitive control (NC), both A beta PET and MRI showed similar results, with comparable sensitivity (A beta PET: 0.93, MRI: 0.85) and specificity (A beta PET: 0.95, MRI: 0.82), without significant differences (p = 0.38 and 0.19). Similarly, in detecting MCI from NC, both A beta PET and MRI demonstrated similar sensitivity (A beta PET: 0.69, MRI: 0.64) and specificity (A beta PET: 0.75, MRI: 0.76) without significant differences (p = 0.40 and 0.94). However, 18F-FMM seems to have a higher specificity compared to MRI when distinguishing AD from MCI (P = 0.03) and AD from NC (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates that A beta PET demonstrates similar sensitivity and specificity to MRI in diagnosing Alzheimer's disease. However, the limited number of studies may impact the evidence of the current study; further larger sample prospective research is required to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic effectiveness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the post-treatment surveillance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Zhu, Y.
    McLaren, O.
    Hardman, J.
    Evans, J.
    Williams, R.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2023, 137 (01): : 22 - 30
  • [22] Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography
    Schuijf, JD
    Bax, JJ
    Shaw, LJ
    de Roos, A
    Lamb, HJ
    van der Wall, EE
    Wijns, W
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 151 (02) : 404 - 411
  • [23] Imaging discrepancies between magnetic resonance imaging and brain perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and verification with amyloid positron emission tomography
    Yokoyama, Shunichi
    Kajiya, Yoriko
    Yoshinaga, Takuma
    Tani, Atsushi
    Hirano, Hirofumi
    PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2014, 14 (02) : 110 - 117
  • [24] Diagnostic Performance of Noninvasive Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging for the Detection of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease A Meta-Analysis
    Jaarsma, Caroline
    Leiner, Tim
    Bekkers, Sebastiaan C.
    Crijns, Harry J.
    Wildberger, Joachim E.
    Nagel, Eike
    Nelemans, Patricia J.
    Schalla, Simon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (19) : 1719 - 1728
  • [25] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Negative Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Cerebrospinal Fluid Amyloid-β42 over Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography
    Pyun, J. N.
    Kang, M. J.
    Baek, S. J.
    Lee, K.
    Park, Y. H.
    Kim, S. Y.
    JPAD-JOURNAL OF PREVENTION OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2024, 11 (04): : 1041 - 1046
  • [26] Positron emission tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of myocardial viability: A meta-analysis
    Bandong, I.
    Fuentes, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S327 - S328
  • [27] Cardiac amyloidosis imaging with amyloid positron emission tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Yong Joong
    Ha, Sejin
    Kim, Yong-il
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 123 - 132
  • [28] Cardiac amyloidosis imaging with amyloid positron emission tomography: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yong Joong Kim
    Sejin Ha
    Yong-il Kim
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2020, 27 : 123 - 132
  • [29] Discriminative Power of Arterial Spin Labelling Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Changes for Amyloid-β-Positive Subjects in the Alzheimer's Disease Continuum
    Tosun, Duygu
    Schuff, Norbert
    Jagust, William
    Weiner, Michael W.
    NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES, 2016, 16 (1-2) : 87 - 94
  • [30] Multimodal Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Extracapsular Extension in Head and Neck Cancer
    Sheppard, Sean C.
    Giger, Roland
    Bojaxhiu, Beat
    Sachpekidis, Christos
    Dammann, Florian
    Dettmer, Matthias S.
    Arnold, Andreas
    Wartenberg, Jan
    Nisa, Lluis
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (01): : E163 - E169