Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Stojadinovic, Miroslav [1 ]
Stojadinovic, Milorad [2 ]
Jankovic, Slobodan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Svetozara Markov 69, Kragujevac 34000, Serbia
[2] Univ Clin Ctr Serbia, Clin Nephrol, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Kragujevac, Fac Med Sci, Pharmacol & Toxicol Dept, Kragujevac, Serbia
关键词
Prostate cancer; Prostate biopsy; Diagnosis; Machine learning; Intermediate-risk; RADIATION-THERAPY; STRATIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11255-024-04342-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposesIntermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) is the most common risk group for localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that utilizes biopsy predictors to estimate the probability of IR PCa and assess its performance compared to the traditional clinical model.MethodsBetween January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of <= 20 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies. Patient's age, PSA, digital rectal exam, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and previous negative biopsy, number of positive cores, Gleason score, and biopsy outcome were recorded. Patients are categorized into no cancer, very low, low-, and intermediate-risk categories. The relationship between the model and IR PCa was investigated using binary generalized linear model (GLM) and assessed its discriminatory ability by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsAmong 729 patients, PCa was detected in 234 individuals (32.1%), with 120 (16.5%) diagnosed with IR PCa. The AUC for the novel model compared to the clinical model was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.722-0.889) versus 0.669 (95% CI: 0.543-0.790), with a p-value of 0.018. In DCA, the GLM outperformed the clinical model by over 7%, potentially allowing for an additional 44.3% reduction in unnecessary biopsies. The PSAD emerged as the most significant predictor.ConclusionWe developed a GLM utilizing pre-biopsy features to predict IR PCa. The model demonstrated good discrimination and clinical applicability, which could assist urologists in determining the necessity of a prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1737 / 1746
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Men With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Hilton, Joan F.
    Reese, Adam C.
    Zaid, Harras B.
    Porten, Sima P.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (02) : 228 - 234
  • [42] The value of apparent diffusion coefficient values in predicting Gleason grading of low to intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Yan, Xu
    Ma, Ke
    Zhu, Li
    Pan, Yiqi
    Wang, Yuting
    Shi, Jiong
    Mai, Xiaoli
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [43] Genomic prostate score and treatment selection in favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Margolis, Eric
    Lowentritt, Benjamin H.
    Pieczonka, Christopher M.
    Bennett, John P.
    Pavlova, Marina
    Zambon, Joao Paulo
    Groskopf, Jack
    Uchio, Edward
    BJUI COMPASS, 2025, 6 (03):
  • [44] High hypofractionation using beacon transponders in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: first results
    Di Brina, L.
    D'agostino, G.
    Franzese, C.
    Franceschini, D.
    Comito, T.
    De Rose, F.
    Navarria, P.
    Tozzi, A.
    Iftode, C.
    Ascolese, A.
    Clerici, E.
    Pasini, L.
    Benetti, A.
    Scorsetti, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S717 - S717
  • [45] Risk stratification for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: Are we comparing apples with oranges?
    Wilcox, S. W.
    Silva, T. De Campos
    Wu, B.
    Aherne, N. J.
    Shakespeare, T. P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S116 - S116
  • [46] The risk of biochemical recurrence for intermediate-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Kurbegovic, Sorel
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Thomsen, Frederik Birkebaek
    Gruschy, Lisa
    Iversen, Peter
    Brasso, Klaus
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 51 (06) : 450 - 456
  • [47] Stratifying Risk for Men With Low-Volume Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Klotz, Laurence
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (08) : 1133 - 1133
  • [48] Making a case “against” focal therapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    Paolo Gontero
    Giancarlo Marra
    Dogu Teber
    Shahrokh Shariat
    Selami Albayrak
    Rafael Coelho
    Simon Tanguay
    Badrinath Konety
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 719 - 728
  • [49] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Kishan, Amar U.
    King, Christopher R.
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 268 - 278
  • [50] Integrated somatic subtypes of localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
    Fox, Natalie S.
    Lalonde, Emilie
    Livingstone, Julie
    Hopkins, Julia
    Shiah, Yu-Jia
    Huang, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (06)