Liability and Trust Analysis Framework for Multi-Actor Dynamic Microservices

被引:0
|
作者
Anser, Yacine [1 ,2 ]
Gaber, Chrystel [1 ]
Wary, Jean-Philippe [1 ]
Bouzefrane, Samia [2 ]
Yacoub, Meziane [2 ]
Kalinagac, Onur [3 ]
Gur, Gurkan [3 ]
机构
[1] Orange, F-92320 Chatillon, France
[2] Cnam, CEDRIC Lab, F-75003 Paris, France
[3] Zurich Univ Appl Sci ZHAW, Inst Comp Sci, CH-8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
关键词
Microservice architectures; Measurement; Service level agreements; Computer architecture; Vectors; Market research; Monitoring; Liability; trust; microservices; machine learning (ML); service level agreement (SLA);
D O I
10.1109/TNSM.2024.3417934
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Microservices architecture has become an increasingly common approach for building complex software systems. With the distributed nature of microservices, multiple actors can contribute to a service, hence affecting the dynamics of the environment and making the management of liabilities and trust more challenging. Service-Level Agreements (SLAs) are critical in that regard and any SLA violation or breach can result in significant financial damages. One major challenge is the lack of indicators to handle the liability and trust in such architectures. To address this issue, in this paper we propose a liability and trust analysis framework, namely the LASM Analysis Service (LAS), for multi-actor dynamic microservices that employs Machine Learning (ML) techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 71
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frontex and Human Rights : Responsibility in 'Multi-Actor Situations' under the ECHR and EU Public Liability Law
    Raimondo, Giulia
    ETUDES INTERNATIONALES, 2018, 49 (03): : 617 - 629
  • [22] Management in Networks: On Multi-Actor Decision Making
    Kalu, Kalu N.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2010, 70 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [23] Setting conservation priorities in multi-actor systems
    O'Bryan, Christopher J.
    Rhodes, Jonathan R.
    Osunkoya, Olusegun O.
    Lundie-Jenkins, Geoff
    Mudiyanselage, Nisansala Abeysinghe
    Sydes, Travis
    Calvert, Moya
    McDonald-Madden, Eve
    Bode, Michael
    BIOSCIENCE, 2023, 73 (07) : 522 - 532
  • [24] A multi-actor multi-criteria scenario analysis of regional sustainable resource policy
    Akgun, Aliye Ahu
    van Leeuwen, Eveline
    Nijkamp, Peter
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 78 : 19 - 28
  • [25] The multi-actor perspective of engagement on social media
    Shawky, Sara
    Kubacki, Krzysztof
    Dietrich, Timo
    Weaven, Scott
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2022, 64 (01) : 19 - 37
  • [26] Application of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis for Transition Management in Energy Communities
    Lode, Maria Luisa
    te Boveldt, Geert
    Macharis, Cathy
    Coosemans, Thierry
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 18
  • [27] Capabilities for advanced services: A multi-actor perspective
    Story, Vicky M.
    Raddats, Chris
    Burton, Jamie
    Zolkiewski, Judy
    Baines, Tim
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 : 54 - 68
  • [28] Multi-Actor Value Modeling for Federated Systems
    Grogan, Paul T.
    Ho, Koki
    Golkar, Alessandro
    de Weck, Olivier L.
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (02): : 1193 - 1202
  • [29] Scalable and Serializable Networked Multi-actor Programming
    Sang, Bo
    Eugster, Patrick
    Petri, Gustavo
    Ravi, Srivatsan
    Roman, Pierre-Louis
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES-PACMPL, 2020, 4 (OOPSLA):
  • [30] Participative multi-actor safety screening of infrastructures
    Rosmuller, N
    Beroggi, GEG
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2000, 35 (1-3) : 151 - 173