Morphological and functional diversity of floodplain water bodies and their classification according to the structure of the surrounding vegetation cover

被引:0
|
作者
Ruchiy, V. [1 ]
Khrystov, O. [1 ]
Kunakh, O. [2 ]
Zhukov, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Dnipro Orilsky Nat Reserve, UA-52030 Obukhivka, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
[2] Oles Honchar Dnipro Natl Univ, Gagarin Ave 72, UA-49000 Dnipro, Ukraine
[3] Bogdan Khmelnitsky Melitopol State Pedag Univ, Hetmanska St 20, UA-72318 Melitopol, Ukraine
关键词
nature protection; innovative projects; monitoring; bioindication; environmental impact assessment; RIVER-FLOODPLAIN; PHRAGMITES-AUSTRALIS; LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS; VISTULA RIVER; PARANA RIVER; LAKE; DEPTH; MACROPHYTES; HYDROLOGY; BASIN;
D O I
10.15421/012406
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The study identified the indicators of functional and morphological diversity of the Dnipro River floodplain water bodies within the Dnipro-Orilsky Nature Reserve. The database of recorded water bodies of the reserve consists of 302 objects. The total area of the floodplain and the water bodies close to it is 24.2 km(2), and the area of the water bodies is 6.03 km(2). Thus, the water bodies cover 24.9% of the floodplain area. The water bodies of the Dnipro River channel system account for 17.9% of the number of water bodies in the Reserve and 71.4% of the total area of water bodies and the Dnipro River in the projection of the Reserve. The water bodies of the study system are located at a distance of up to 3.2 km from the main channel of the Dnipro River. The average distance is 1.50 +/- 0.04 km. The closest water bodies to the main channel of the Dnipro River are those in the Dnipro riverbed, which were formed as a result of the creation of a reservoir in the floodplain. Three factors with eigenvalues greater than unity were extracted as a result of factor analysis of the morphometric features of the water bodies. These three factors explain 85.8% of the cumulative correlation of morphometric features. Factor 1 reflects a latent variable that can be identified as the total size of the ponds. The total size of the water bodies was the largest for the Orilsky Canal, with slightly smaller sizes in the water bodies of the Dnipro River channel. The smallest water bodies were in the Obukhivka system. Factor 2 as a latent variable can be identified as the level of shoreline development. According to this indicator, the water bodies of different systems did not differ. Factor 3 can be identified as the altitude and variability of the relief surrounding the water bodies. The lowest values of this factor were for the water bodies of the Orilsky Canal and the Obukhivka system. The values were slightly higher for the water bodies of the Taromske and Mykolaivka systems. The highest levels of relief and its variability were characteristic of the areas close to the water bodies of the Dnipro channel system. Cluster analysis allowed us to identify seven clusters that are relatively homogeneous in terms of morphometric features. These clusters can be differentiated based on the results of discriminant analysis. An important aspect of differentiation is the size of the water bodies, the development of the shoreline, and the height of the terrain surrounding the water bodies. The identified clusters correspond well to the types of water bodies, which are selected based on their orientation relative to the preferred direction of water flow. The satellite image classification was used to identify 15 types of vegetation cover within the reserve. The water bodies are characterized by specific spectra of the main types of plant communities in their surroundings. The cluster analysis of the water bodies resulted in nine clusters based on the structure of the vegetation complexes surrounding them. Each cluster contains the entire list of vegetation types that have been established for floodplain ecosystems. The peculiarity of the complexes lies in the specific ratio between different vegetation types. The most important structural factors that distinguish the complexes are the projective cover of oaks, floodplain meadows, and shrubs. At the top level of the hierarchy, the complexes are differentiated by the projective cover of floodplain meadows. At a lower level, the differentiation is based on the projective cover of sands or oaks. The clusters identified on the basis of plant complexes and morphometric features, as well as the types of water bodies in terms of orientation with respect to the prevailing water flows, correspond to each other to a certain extent.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 72
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hydrologic connectivity and land cover affect floodplain lake water quality, fish abundance, and fish diversity in floodplain lakes of the Wabash-White River basin
    Mazur, Martha L. Carlson
    Smith, Bradley
    Bird, Broxton
    McMillan, Sara
    Pyron, Mark
    Hauswald, Cassie
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 38 (01) : 160 - 172
  • [32] Diversity of planktonic rotifer assemblages in the water bodies of the Gemenc floodplain (Duna-Dráva National Park, Hungary)
    Károly Schöll
    Biologia, 2009, 64 : 951 - 958
  • [33] Agriculture cover and local vegetation structure shape Squamata’s diversity in agricultural landscapes in Brazilian Cerrado
    Gabryella de Sousa Mesquita
    Priscila Silveira
    Werther Pereira Ramalho
    Juliana Silveira dos Santos
    Iberê Farina Machado
    Natan Medeiros Maciel
    Wilian Vaz-Silva
    Milton Cezar Ribeiro
    Rosane Garcia Collevatti
    Landscape Ecology, 40 (5)
  • [34] Functional diversity and composition of bryophyte water-related traits in Azorean native vegetation
    Henriques, Dobora S. G.
    Rigal, Francois
    Borges, Paulo A. V.
    Ah-Peng, Claudine
    Gabriel, Rosalina
    PLANT ECOLOGY & DIVERSITY, 2017, 10 (2-3) : 127 - 137
  • [35] Soil Fungal Community Structure and Functional Diversity in a Copper Tailing Dam and Its Surrounding Areas
    Chen, Jian-Wen
    Zhang, Hong
    Li, Jun-Jian
    Liu, Yong
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2021, 42 (04): : 2056 - 2065
  • [36] Butterflies show different functional and species diversity in relationship to vegetation structure and land use
    Aguirre-Gutierrez, Jesus
    WallisDeVries, Michiel F.
    Marshall, Leon
    van't Zelfde, Maarten
    Villalobos-Arambula, Alma R.
    Boekelo, Bastiaen
    Bartholomeus, Harm
    Franzen, Markus
    Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2017, 26 (10): : 1126 - 1137
  • [37] On morphological diversity of southern Dolly Varden trout Salvelinus malma krascheninnikovi from water bodies of Sakhalin
    Pichugin M.Yu.
    Gritsenko O.F.
    Osinov A.G.
    Journal of Ichthyology, 2008, 48 (5) : 367 - 390
  • [38] CLASSIFICATION OF THE PANS OF THE WESTERN ORANGE-FREE-STATE ACCORDING TO VEGETATION STRUCTURE, WITH REFERENCE TO AVIFAUNAL COMMUNITIES
    GELDENHUYS, JN
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 1982, 12 (02): : 55 - 62
  • [39] Reforestation of degraded Kermes oak shrublands with planted pines: effects on vegetation cover, species diversity and community structure
    Petros Ganatsas
    Thekla Tsitsoni
    Marianthi Tsakaldimi
    Theocharis Zagas
    New Forests, 2012, 43 : 1 - 11
  • [40] Are changes in remotely sensed canopy cover associated to changes in vegetation structure, diversity, and composition in recovered tropical shrublands?
    Alma Juliana Lomelí Jiménez
    Diego Rafael Pérez-Salicrup
    Blanca Lorena Figueroa Rangel
    Manuel E. Mendoza-Cantú
    Ramón Cuevas Guzmán
    Ellen Andresen
    Jorge Eduardo Morfín Ríos
    Plant Ecology, 2017, 218 : 1021 - 1033