Analytical and numerical approaches to the analysis of progress curves: A methodological comparison

被引:0
|
作者
Waluga, Thomas [1 ]
von Ziegner, Francesca [1 ]
Skiborowski, Mirko [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Univ Technol, Inst Proc Syst Engn, Am Schwarzenberg Campus 4, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Progress curve analysis; Enzyme reaction kinetics; Modelling; MICHAELIS-MENTEN EQUATION; ENZYME-KINETICS; GLUCOSE ISOMERIZATION; NONLINEAR-REGRESSION; THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; COMPUTER-PROGRAM; ISOMERASE; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.procbio.2025.01.029
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Accurate models of the reaction kinetics of enzymatic reactions are essential for the design of biocatalytic processes. While many experimental studies still build on initial slope analysis, progress curve analysis offers the potential for modelling enzymatic reactions with a significantly lower experimental effort in terms of time and costs, but requires the solution of a dynamic nonlinear optimization problem. There are many different approaches for solving this problem for parameter regression, building on the experimental progress curve data. In order to provide some guidance for selecting an appropriate approach, this study presents a detailed comparison of two analytical and two numerical approaches analysing their strengths and weaknesses on the basis of three case studies. The analytical approaches build on the implicit and explicit integrals of the respective reaction rate equations, while the numerical approaches consider the direct numerical integration of the differential mass balance equations as well as the transformation of the dynamic problem to an algebraic problem by means of spline interpolation of the reaction data. In particular, the dependence of the results on the initial parameter estimates is evaluated, showcasing that the numerical solution with spline interpolation shows a lower dependence on the initial values providing parameter estimates comparable to the analytical approaches, which are however limited in applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Plotting progress: a comparison of three approaches
    Beecroft, CL
    McLeod, GA
    Coventry, DM
    Wildsmith, JAW
    ANAESTHESIA, 2006, 61 (01) : 100 - 100
  • [42] Hyper Illumination of Exoplanets: Analytical and Numerical Approaches
    Carter, Jennifer L.
    Perera, Risinie D.
    Way, M. J.
    ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 167 (05):
  • [43] New analytical and numerical approaches for geopotential modeling
    Petrovskaya, MS
    Vershkov, AN
    Pavlis, NK
    JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2001, 75 (12) : 661 - 672
  • [44] New analytical and numerical approaches for geopotential modeling
    M. S. Petrovskaya
    A. N. Vershkov
    N. K. Pavlis
    Journal of Geodesy, 2001, 75 : 661 - 672
  • [45] Homogenization of periodic sandwiches -: Numerical and analytical approaches
    Bourgeois, S
    Cartraud, P
    Débordes, O
    MECHANICS OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES, 1998, : 131 - 138
  • [46] Analytical and simplified numerical approaches of FRCM pipes
    Bernat-Maso, Ernest
    Mercedes, Luis
    Gil, Lluis
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2020, 247
  • [47] Analysis of methodological approaches to the project management
    Tkhorikov, Boris A.
    Semibratsky, Maksim V.
    Gerasimenko, Olga A.
    Merezhko, Anna A.
    AMAZONIA INVESTIGA, 2018, 7 (13): : 65 - 71
  • [48] COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL MODELING APPROACHES FOR SIZING OF SEASONAL STORAGE SOLAR HEATING-SYSTEMS
    PELTOLA, SS
    LUND, PD
    SOLAR ENERGY, 1992, 48 (04) : 267 - 273
  • [49] Comparison of new analytical and numerical approaches to model the three-roll-push-bending process
    Plettke, Raoul (raoul.plettke@fau.de), 1600, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., 29, route de Pre-Bois, Case Postale 856, CH-1215 Geneva 15, CH-1215, Switzerland (07):
  • [50] On Thermally Interacting Multiple Boreholes with Variable Heating Strength: Comparison between Analytical and Numerical Approaches
    Koohi-Fayegh, Seama
    Rosen, Marc A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (08): : 1848 - 1866