Papillary craniopharyngioma management in the era of BRAF and MEK inhibition

被引:0
|
作者
Damante, Mark [1 ]
Cua, Santino [1 ]
Kreatsoulas, Daniel [1 ]
Giglio, Pierre [2 ]
Ghalib, Luma [3 ]
Biswas, Chandrima [1 ]
Wu, Kyle C. [1 ]
Prevedello, Daniel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, 410 W 10th Ave N1019 Doan Hall, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Div Neuro Oncol, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Div Endocrinol, Columbus, OH USA
关键词
Papillary craniopharyngioma; BRAF V600E mutation; Targeted therapy; Radiation; RADIATION-THERAPY; SINGLE-CENTER; MUTATIONS; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-025-04969-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposePapillary craniopharyngioma is a rare entity, demonstrating BRAF-V600E mutations in approximately 95% of patients. Recently, a phase 2 trial of patients treated with surgery and BRAF/MEKi demonstrated 91% reduction in residual tumor volume. This study allowed for additional treatments at the discretion of the treatment team without reporting subsequent rates of endocrinopathy or visual decline. We aimed to evaluate the possibility of employing BRAF/MEKi without the need for adjuvant radiotherapy therapies.MethodsA retrospective report of two patients treated with resection and BRAF/MEKi without additional treatment were analyzed. Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, pre- and post-treatment radiographic volumes, adverse events, and endocrinologic and visual outcomes, were recorded and analyzed.ResultsTwo patients underwent subtotal resection followed by BRAF/MEKi without adjuvant treatment. Mean length of BRAF therapy was 21.4 months and MEKi therapy was 12.94 months. Mean preoperative nodule volume was 0.33 cm [3] and 2.29 cm [3] and cystic volume was 5.04 cm [3] and 6.18 cm [3] in case 1 and case 2, respectively. Neither patient received radiation. Grade 3 cardiotoxicity developed in case 1 after 6.5 months, with function recovering completely following discontinuation of MEKi. BRAF therapy was discontinued electively after 23.5 months. The second patient remains on dual inhibition therapy without toxicity. For these cases, post-treatment nodule volumes are 0.07 cm [3] (98.4% reduction) and 0.04 cm [3] (99.2% reduction), respectively, and cystic volume 0.0 cm [3] in both patients. Progression free survival is 100% with a mean follow up of 36-months.ConclusionsUtilizing surgery and BRAF/MEKi without adjuvant radiation, we demonstrate excellent disease control with reversible toxicity. Avoiding additional treatments may spare vital functions and unnecessary procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 232
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Response to BRAF/MEK Inhibition After Progression With BRAF Inhibition in a Patient With Anaplastic Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma
    Hussain, Faiz
    Horbinski, Craig M.
    Chmura, Steven J.
    Yamini, Bakhtiar
    Lukas, Rimas V.
    NEUROLOGIST, 2018, 23 (05) : 163 - 166
  • [32] Alliance A071601: Phase II trial of BRAF/MEK inhibition in newly diagnosed papillary craniopharyngiomas.
    Brastianos, Priscilla Kaliopi
    Twohy, Erin
    Geyer, Susan Michelle
    Gerstner, Elizabeth Robins
    Kaufmann, Timothy J.
    Ruff, Michael
    Bota, Daniela Annenelie
    Reardon, David A.
    Cohen, Adam Louis
    De La Fuente, Macarena Ines
    Lesser, Glenn Jay
    Campian, Jian Li
    Agarwalla, Pankaj
    Kumthekar, Priya
    Cahill, Daniel P.
    Shih, Helen Alice
    Brown, Paul D.
    Santagata, Sandro
    Barker, Frederick G.
    Galanis, Evanthia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [33] A phase I/II study of MCS110 with BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with melanoma after progression on BRAF/MEK inhibition
    Buchbinder, Elizabeth I. I.
    Giobbie-Hurder, Anita
    Ott, Patrick A. A.
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2023, 41 (03) : 365 - 370
  • [34] A phase I/II study of MCS110 with BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with melanoma after progression on BRAF/MEK inhibition
    Elizabeth I. Buchbinder
    Anita Giobbie-Hurder
    Patrick A. Ott
    Investigational New Drugs, 2023, 41 : 365 - 370
  • [35] FGFR inhibition re-sensitizes BRAF/MEK dual resistant cells to the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination
    Wang, Victoria E.
    Settleman, Jeffrey
    McCormic, Frank
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [36] Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma with BRAF V600 Mutations
    Flaherty, Keith T.
    Infante, Jeffery R.
    Daud, Adil
    Gonzalez, Rene
    Kefford, Richard F.
    Sosman, Jeffrey
    Hamid, Omid
    Schuchter, Lynn
    Cebon, Jonathan
    Ibrahim, Nageatte
    Kudchadkar, Ragini
    Burris, Howard A., III
    Falchook, Gerald
    Algazi, Alain
    Lewis, Karl
    Long, Georgina V.
    Puzanov, Igor
    Lebowitz, Peter
    Singh, Ajay
    Little, Shonda
    Sun, Peng
    Allred, Alicia
    Ouellet, Daniele
    Kim, Kevin B.
    Patel, Kiran
    Weber, Jeffrey
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (18): : 1694 - 1703
  • [37] Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma
    Queirolo, Paola
    Picasso, Virginia
    Spagnolo, Francesco
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2015, 41 (06) : 519 - 526
  • [38] Aggressive Childhood-onset Papillary Craniopharyngioma Managed With Vemurafenib, a BRAF Inhibitor
    Chik, Constance L.
    van Landeghem, Frank K. H.
    Easaw, Jacob C.
    Mehta, Vivek
    JOURNAL OF THE ENDOCRINE SOCIETY, 2021, 5 (05)
  • [39] Remarkable Case of Dual BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Cholangiocarcinoma
    Sadaps, Meena
    Sohal, Davendra P. S.
    JCO PRECISION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 3 : 1 - 4
  • [40] Phenotype switching as a resistance mechanism to BRAF and MEK inhibition
    Cheng, P. F.
    Freiberger, S. N.
    Irmisch, A.
    Dummer, R.
    Levesque, M. P.
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 27 (03) : E91 - E92