Overview of flue gas mercury pollution control technologies and attempts to explore pathways for electrochemical removal of mercury and mercury resourcing

被引:0
|
作者
Cao, Limei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaohan [1 ]
Du, Yan [1 ]
Lv, Yiqing [1 ]
Yang, Ji [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, State Environm Protect Key Lab Environm Risk Asses, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Inst Pollut Control & Ecol Secur, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING | 2025年 / 13卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hg-0; Electrochemical oxidation; Electrochemical reduction; Catalytic oxidation; AOPs; GASEOUS ELEMENTAL MERCURY; MODIFIED SCR CATALYST; FIRED POWER-PLANTS; LOW-TEMPERATURE; HG-0; REMOVAL; DESULFURIZATION SLURRY; EMISSION CONTROL; OXIDATION; COAL; COMBUSTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2024.115179
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mercury emissions derived from coal combustion, metal sintering, goldmining etc., are receiving increasing attention because they can pose a serious risk to human health and the environment. Elemental mercury is one of the most difficult forms to handle due to its insolubility in water and volatility and so on. This review comments the progress of research on various methods for the removal of Hg0 such as air pollution control devices (APCDs), adsorption, catalytic oxidation, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) and electrochemical process. Electrochemical method is an environmentally friendly technology which uses electrode reactions to remove pollutants directly or uses special electrode materials to oxidise reactants by producing strong oxidising groups under certain conditions. The mercury removal performances and reaction mechanisms of electrochemical technology are fully discussed, which aims to strengthen the understanding of this research topic and provide a valuable reference for the development of Hg0 sustainable, recyclable and resource-based techniques.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Control of mercury vapor emissions from combustion flue gas
    Rong Yan
    David Tee Liang
    Joo Hwa Tay
    Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung, 2005, 17 (2): : 63 - 63
  • [22] Control of mercury vapor emissions from combustion flue gas
    Rong Yan
    David Tee Liang
    Joo Hwa Tay
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2003, 10
  • [23] Removal of mercury from flue gas using coal gasification slag
    Wan, Zhaoxin
    Duan, Liangyan
    Hu, Xiude
    Li, Xinlei
    Fang, Long
    Guo, Qingjie
    Sun, Deshuai
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 231
  • [24] Development of dry control technology for emissions of mercury in flue gas
    Huang, HS
    Wu, JAM
    Livengood, CD
    HAZARDOUS WASTE & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1996, 13 (01): : 107 - 119
  • [25] Control of mercury vapor emissions from combustion flue gas
    Yan, R
    Liang, DT
    Tay, JH
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2003, 10 (06) : 399 - 407
  • [26] A technique to control mercury from flue gas: The Thief Process
    O'Dowd, William J.
    Pennline, Henry W.
    Freeman, Mark C.
    Granite, Evan J.
    Hargis, Richard A.
    Lacher, Clement J.
    Karash, Andrew
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 87 (12) : 1071 - 1084
  • [27] Removal and speciation of mercury compounds in flue gas from a waste incinerator
    Hwang, In-Hee
    Minoya, Hiroshi
    Matsuo, Takayuki
    Matsuto, Toshihiko
    Tojo, Yasumasa
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 37 (21) : 2723 - 2730
  • [28] Review on Magnetic Adsorbents for Removal of Elemental Mercury from Flue Gas
    Yang, Wei
    Wang, Zhihua
    Liu, Yangxian
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2020, 34 (11) : 13473 - 13490
  • [29] Oxidative Removal of Elemental Mercury in Flue Gas by DBD Discharge Plasma
    Jiang, Yuze
    An, Jiutao
    Shang, Kefeng
    Lu, Na
    Li, Jie
    Wu, Yan
    ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1-6, 2012, 518-523 : 2621 - 2624
  • [30] Mercury removal from incineration flue gas by organic and inorganic adsorbents
    Jurng, J
    Lee, TG
    Lee, GY
    Lee, SJ
    Kim, BH
    Seier, J
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2002, 47 (09) : 907 - 913