When floodplain restoration meets socio-ecological goals for rural stormwater management

被引:0
|
作者
Peterson, Lisa A. [1 ]
Awerbuch, Patricia M. [2 ]
Spatari, Sabrina [3 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Sch Econ, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Chesapeake bay; floodplain restoration; industrial ecology; rural development; social-ecological systems; stormwater management; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS; POOL RESOURCE THEORY; FRAMEWORK; GOVERNANCE; WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; AMISH;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.13589
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Floodplain restoration is an approved stormwater management method, but rarely chosen by developers due to the perceived high cost and lengthy approvals required from regulatory agencies. Yet, when chosen, restoring a floodplain yields significant environmental benefits for the community due to improved flood resiliency and wetland habitat and superior reduction of negative externalities. In 2012, a corporation in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, explored the option to restore a historic floodplain on its 40-hectare property to fulfill the stormwater management requirements for a planned development project. There was a social dynamic at play in this instance that allowed the developer, municipality, and citizens to achieve a win across three dimensions often in conflict: maximizing private economic returns, achieving environmental compliance, and benefiting the community ecologically. Using a social-ecological system (SES) framework, this paper analyzes the course of the development project through the government approvals process and the actual restoration of the floodplain. Two influential actors are identified who do not often appear in the literature on SESs: sports advocacy groups and religious groups. We posit that the developer's industry was uniquely receptive to conservation appeals and that the proximity of an urban metropolis made collective action a relevant strategy for the region. Critical factors in the decision process were the cost-benefit analysis contracted by the developer, local (county) government leadership, and a history of local citizen activism. We conclude that a misalignment of anthropogenic and ecological boundaries can prevent such positive outcomes and that collective action is a viable strategy to overcome that challenge.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 80
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evolutionary psychology meets socio-ecological psychology: the motivational psychologies of disease-avoidance and parental care
    Schaller, Mark
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 32 : 6 - 11
  • [42] Building a socio-ecological monitoring platform for the comprehensive management of tropical dry forests
    Norden, Natalia
    Gonzalez-M., Roy
    Avella-M., Andres
    Salgado-Negret, Beatriz
    Alcazar, Carolina
    Rodriguez-Buritica, Susana
    Aguilar-Cano, Jose
    Castellanos-Castro, Carolina
    Calderon, Jhon J.
    Caycedo-Rosales, Paula
    Cuadros, Hermes
    Diaz-Pulido, Angelica
    Fajardo, Zoraida
    Franke-Ante, Rebeca
    Garcia, Daniel H.
    Gonzalez, Mailyn A.
    Hernandez-Jaramillo, Alma
    Idarraga-Piedrahita, Alvaro
    Lopez-Camacho, Rene
    Martinez-Callejas, Sindy J.
    Nieto, Jhon
    Pizano, Camila
    Rodriguez, Gina
    Torres, Alba M.
    Vergara, Hernando
    Garcia, Hernando
    PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, 2021, 3 (03) : 238 - 248
  • [43] Overabundant wild ungulate populations in Europe: management with consideration of socio-ecological consequences
    Valente, Ana M.
    Acevedo, Pelayo
    Figueiredo, Ana M.
    Fonseca, Carlos
    Torres, Rita T.
    MAMMAL REVIEW, 2020, 50 (04) : 353 - 366
  • [44] Objectives for management of socio-ecological systems in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia
    Ingrid Elizabeth Van Putten
    Catherine Mary Dichmont
    Leo Ximenes Cabral Dutra
    Olivier Thébaud
    Roy Aijun Deng
    Eddie Jebreen
    Randall Owens
    Ricardo Pascual
    Mark Read
    Carolyn Thompson
    Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16 : 1417 - 1431
  • [45] Marine spatial planning for socio-ecological management of animal-associated microbiomes
    Busch, Kathrin
    Pardy, Gary
    King, Marty
    Lirette, Camille
    Murillo, Francisco Javier
    Kenchington, Ellen
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2024, 6 (10)
  • [46] Objectives for management of socio-ecological systems in the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia
    Van Putten, Ingrid Elizabeth
    Dichmont, Catherine Mary
    Dutra, Leo Ximenes Cabral
    Thebaud, Olivier
    Deng, Roy Aijun
    Jebreen, Eddie
    Owens, Randall
    Pascual, Ricardo
    Read, Mark
    Thompson, Carolyn
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2016, 16 (05) : 1417 - 1431
  • [47] Development of a socio-ecological environmental justice model for watershed-based management
    Sanchez, Georgina M.
    Nejadhashemi, A. Pouyan
    Zhang, Zhen
    Woznicki, Sean A.
    Habron, Geoffrey
    Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra
    Shortridge, Ashton
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 518 : 162 - 177
  • [48] Nexus between indigenous ecological knowledge and ecosystem services: a socio-ecological analysis for sustainable ecosystem management
    Manob Das
    Arijit Das
    Selim Seikh
    Rajiv Pandey
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 61561 - 61578
  • [49] Identifying socio-ecological networks in rural-urban gradients: Diagnosis of a changing cultural landscape
    Arnaiz-Schmitz, C.
    Schmitz, M. F.
    Herrero-Jauregui, C.
    Gutierrez-Angonese, J.
    Pineda, F. D.
    Montes, C.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 612 : 625 - 635
  • [50] Socio-ecological super-determination of health in rural areas in Humaita, State of Amazonas, Brazil
    Schuetz, Gabriel Eduardo
    da Silva Mello, Marcia Gomide
    Ribeiro de Carvalho, Marcia Aparecida
    Camara, Volney de Magalhaes
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2014, 19 (10): : 4051 - 4060