Dezocine versus esketamine as postoperative analgesia in women undergoing cesarean section

被引:0
|
作者
Qiao, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Matern & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Nantong 226007, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Esketamine; dezocine; cesarean section; patient controlled intravenous analgesia; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i1.13
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The objective of this was to investigate the effect of esketamine as a postoperative analgesia in women undergoing caesarean section. A total of 134 patients were divided into two groups: 112 received esketamine and 22 received dezocine, based on their voluntary choice of analgesic drugs for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). The postoperative analgesic effects were compared between the two groups. The results showed that the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 12 and 24 hours post-operation were significantly lower in the esketamine group than in the dezocine group (P<0.05). Additionally, the time to first anal exhaust was earlier in the esketamine group (P<0.05), while there were no significant differences in the time to first ambulation or urination between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between the groups (P>0.05). The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) scores at 1 and 3 days after surgery were significantly higher than the preoperative scores in both groups (P<0.05); however, the EPDS scores were significantly lower in the esketamine group compared to the Dezocine group (P<0.05). We conclude that esketamine provides effective postoperative pain relief in women undergoing caesarean section patients without increasing adverse reactions, while it promotes recovery and reduces postpartum depression.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES OF CARBETOCIN AND OXYTOCIN IN WOMEN UNDERGOING CESAREAN SECTION
    Moertl, Manfred
    Kraschl, Jakob
    Friedrich, Stefan
    Pickel, Karoline
    Ulrich, Daniela
    Eder, Martina
    Fruhmann, Anna
    Mueller, Guenther
    Walcher, Wolfgang
    Alkan, Isa
    Lang, Uwe
    Schlembach, Dietmar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (06) : S86 - S86
  • [42] PHARMACOKINETICS OF PROPOFOL IN WOMEN UNDERGOING ELECTIVE CESAREAN-SECTION
    GIN, T
    GREGORY, MA
    CHAN, K
    BUCKLEY, T
    OH, TE
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 64 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [43] Preoperative Anxiety and Sociocultural Factors in Women Undergoing Cesarean Section
    Maharjan, Manju
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (06): : 1252 - 1253
  • [44] POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION - SUBLINGUAL BUPRENORPHINE VS SUBCUTANEOUS MORPHINE
    ABID, A
    BENHAMOU, D
    LABAILLE, T
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1990, 9 (03): : 275 - 279
  • [45] THE ADDITION OF CLONIDINE TO EPIDURAL MORPHINE PROLONGS POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    CELLENO, D
    CAPOGNA, G
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 : 105 - 105
  • [46] A COMPARISON OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA FOLLOWING SPINAL OR EPIDURAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION
    LAM, FY
    BROOME, IJ
    MATTHEWS, PJ
    ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 49 (01) : 65 - 67
  • [47] Observation about clinical effects of PCSA on postoperative analgesia after second cesarean section
    Li, Xiangnan
    Shao, Dongbo
    Qian, Jing
    Yu, Guangdong
    Yuan, Conghu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (10): : 14738 - 14744
  • [48] Postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery
    Sen Tan, Hon
    Diomede, Olga
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS, 2021, 59 (03) : 90 - 97
  • [49] EPIDURAL MORPHINE AS POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC FOLLOWING CESAREAN-SECTION UNDER EPIDURAL ANALGESIA
    KANTO, J
    ERKKOLA, R
    AALTONEN, L
    AARIMAA, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1985, 23 (01) : 43 - 44
  • [50] EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION
    MOIR, DD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1979, 51 (02) : 79 - 80