Validity and reliability of an immersive virtual reality adaptation of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test

被引:0
|
作者
Maden, Cagtay [1 ]
Karabulut, Demet Gozacan [1 ]
Bagci, Burcu [2 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Islam Sci & Technol Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Gaziantep, Turkiye
[2] SANKO Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Gaziantep, Turkiye
来源
HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION | 2025年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
6-minute pegboard and ring test; Virtual reality; Assessment; Upper extremity functional capacity; Endurance; Tele-rehabilitation; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101981
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aim: Virtual reality offers new clinical assessment and rehabilitation options that can complement or, in some cases, replace traditional methods. However, the applicability of using virtual reality tools for assessment of upper limb functional capacity has not been fully explored. We therefore developed an immersive virtual reality adaptation of the 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (6PBRT-VR). The aim of the study was to test the validity and reliability of the 6PBRT-VR for the assessment of upper extremity functional capacity, and to assess the performance and feasibility of the proposed tool. Methods: Thirty healthy young adults were included in the study. The participants performed the classical 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test first and then the 6PBRT-VR. The test-retest reliability of the 6PBRT-VR was assessed on intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was assessed on the correlation between the 6PBRT-VR test-retest scores (number of rings moved) and the correlation between the scores from the classical 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test and the 6PBRT-VR. Convergent validity was assessed on correlations with handgrip strength and the total Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Cardiorespiratory responses were also measured (at baseline and after each test). Perceived arm fatigue was assessed on the Modified Borg Scale. Results: The 6PBRT-VR exhibited excellent test-retest reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.866 (95% confidence interval 0.737-0.934). Mean 6PBRT-VR score correlated strongly with the mean score of the classical 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test (r = 0.817, p < 0.001). A significant association was found between the 6PBRT-VR and the classical 6-Minute Pegboard and Ring Test in terms of variations in heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and Modified Borg Scale score (p < 0.001). Mean 6PBRT-VR score showed moderate correlations with right (r = 0.571, p = 0.001) and left handgrip strength (r = 0.550, p = 0.002). Conclusion: The 6PBRT-VR is a reliable and valid virtual tool for assessing upper-extremity functional capacity in young adults. @ 2024 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlation between 6-minute pegboard and ring test, trunk function, upper extremity activities of daily living, and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis
    Ozel, Cemile Bozdemir
    Uzuner, Gulnur Tekgol
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (03) : 824 - 825
  • [42] Validity of the 6-Minute Walk Test and YMCA Submaximal Cycle Test During Midpregnancy
    Tinius, Rachel A.
    Blankenship, Maire
    Maples, Jill M.
    Pitts, Bailey C.
    Furgal, Karen
    Norris, Elizabeth S.
    Hoover, Donald L.
    Olenick, Alyssa
    Lambert, Joshua
    Cade, William Todd
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2021, 35 (11) : 3236 - 3242
  • [43] Test-Retest Reliability of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Individuals With Down Syndrome
    Casey, Amanda F.
    Wang, Xu
    Osterling, Kristin
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2012, 93 (11): : 2068 - 2074
  • [44] Two-minute versus 6-minute walk distances during 6-minute walk test in neuromuscular disease: Is the 2-minute walk test an effective alternative to a 6-minute walk test?
    Witherspoon, J. W.
    Vasavada, R.
    Logaraj, R. H.
    Waite, M.
    Collins, J.
    Shieh, C.
    Meilleur, K.
    Bonnemann, C.
    Jain, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2019, 23 (01) : 165 - 170
  • [45] Concurrent validity of the 2-and 6-minute walk test in knee osteoarthritis
    Gacto-Sanchez, Mariano
    Lozano-Meca, Jose Antonio
    Lozano-Guadalajara, Juan Vicente
    Montilla-Herrador, Joaquina
    KNEE, 2023, 43 : 34 - 41
  • [46] 6-MINUTE RESPONSIVENESS TEST TO INSULIN
    ANDERSON, GE
    SCIENCE, 1954, 119 (3094) : 516 - 516
  • [47] 6-minute walk test with headphones
    Boaventura, Rita
    Almeida, Leonor
    Machado, Francisco
    Moreira, Ermelinda
    Amorim, Pedro
    Pimentel, Ana
    Pipa, Joana Chaves
    Neves, Andreia
    Teles, Patricia
    Martins, Natalia
    Drummond, Marta
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2018, 52
  • [48] Determinants of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test as an unsupported upper-extremity exercise capacity measure in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Ozsoy, Ismail
    Kahraman, Buse Ozcan
    Ozsoy, Gulsah
    Ilcin, Nursen
    Kahraman, Turhan
    Acar, Serap
    Tekin, Nil
    Savci, Sema
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2018, 9 (06) : 863 - 870
  • [49] Determinants of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test as an unsupported upper-extremity exercise capacity measure in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Ismail Ozsoy
    Buse Ozcan Kahraman
    Gulsah Ozsoy
    Nursen Ilcin
    Turhan Kahraman
    Serap Acar
    Nil Tekin
    Sema Savci
    European Geriatric Medicine, 2018, 9 : 863 - 870
  • [50] Can we use the 6-minute step test instead of the 6-minute walking test? An observational study
    da Costa, C. H.
    da Silva, K. M.
    Maiworm, A.
    Raphael, Y.
    Parnayba, J.
    Da Cal, M.
    Figueira, B.
    Condesso, D.
    Rufino, R.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2017, 103 (01) : 48 - 52