Factors in Initial Anticoagulation Choice in Hospitalized Patients With Pulmonary Embolism

被引:1
|
作者
Stubblefield, William B. [1 ]
Helderman, Ron [2 ]
Strokes, Natalie [3 ]
Greineder, Colin F. [4 ]
Barnes, Geoffrey D. [5 ]
Vinson, David R. [6 ,7 ]
Westafer, Lauren M. [3 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Emergency Med, Chan Med Sch Baystate, 759 Chestnut St, Springfield, MA 01099 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Frankel Cardiovasc Ctr, Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res, Pleasanton, CA USA
[7] Kaiser Permanente Roseville Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Roseville, CA USA
[8] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Healthcare Delivery & Populat Sci, Chan Med Sch Baystate, Springfield, MA USA
关键词
MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN; UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN; MANAGEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52877
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ImportanceDespite guideline recommendations to use low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) or direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of most patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), US-based studies have found increasing use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hospitalized patients. ObjectiveTo identify barriers and facilitators of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis qualitative study conducted semistructured interviews from February 1 to June 3, 2024, that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process using reflexive thematic analysis. Interview participants were physicians in emergency medicine, hospital medicine (hospitalist), interventional cardiology, and interventional radiology. Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling targeting UFH-dominant vs LMWH-dominant approaches in hospitalized patients with acute PE. We triangulated results with a group of interventional cardiologists and radiologists (interventionalists). Main Outcomes and MeasuresCommon themes and factors associated with anticoagulant selection for hospitalized patients with acute PE. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify these themes and factors. ResultsOf the 46 interviewees (median [IQR] age, 43 [36-50] years; 33 who identified as men [71.7%]), 25 (54.3%) were emergency physicians, 17 (37.0%) were hospitalists, and 4 (8.7%) were interventionalists. Each interview lasted a median (IQR) of 29 (25-32) minutes. Prominent themes associated with anticoagulant selection included agnosticism regarding choice of anticoagulant, the inertia of learned practice, and therapeutic momentum after anticoagulation initiation. Institutional culture and support were factors associated with choice of the dominant anticoagulation strategy. Additionally, factors associated with UFH use were fear of decompensation and misperceptions regarding the pharmacology of anticoagulants and catheter-directed treatments. Conclusions and RelevanceIn this qualitative study, physicians across a spectrum of specialties and geographical settings reported common barriers and facilitators to the use of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE, particularly agnosticism regarding choice of anticoagulant, inertia of learned practice, therapeutic momentum after anticoagulation initiation, and institutional culture and support. Future implementation efforts may consider targeting these domains.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Electrocardiographic changes as a prognostic tool for hospitalized patients with pulmonary embolism
    Choi, Sun Ha
    Cha, Seung-Ick
    Park, Ji-Eun
    Park, Sunji
    Lee, Yong-Hoon
    Seo, Hyewon
    Yoo, Seung-Soo
    Lee, Shin-Yup
    Lee, Jaehee
    Kim, Chang-Ho
    Park, Jae-Yong
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2020, 192 : 61 - 63
  • [43] CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION IN PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED FOR PULMONARY EMBOLISM
    Wahab, Abdul
    Abdullah, Abdullah
    Zaheer, Muhammad
    Alweis, Richard
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01) : 64 - 64
  • [44] Pulmonary Embolism Prevalence Among Hospitalized Patients With COPD Reply
    Couturaud, Francis
    Sanchez, Olivier
    Bertoletti, Laurent
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 325 (18): : 1903 - 1903
  • [45] Disparity in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients with pneumonia.
    Kapoor, Avina
    Dang, Qianyu
    Ragni, Margaret V.
    BLOOD, 2006, 108 (11) : 940A - 941A
  • [46] Eletrocardiographic Changes as a Prognostic Tool for Hospitalized Patients with Pulmonary Embolism
    Cha, S.
    Park, J.
    Park, S.
    Choi, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [47] Predictors of Pulmonary Embolism in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19
    Bahk, J.
    Narasimhan, B.
    Ho, K.
    El Halabi, M.
    Alexander, M. J.
    Filopei, J.
    Yesha, L.
    Lookstein, R.
    Steiger, D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [48] The challenges of identifying pulmonary embolism in patients hospitalized for exacerbations of COPD
    Li, Rufang
    Zeng, Jie
    Sun, DanXiong
    Li, Dengyuan
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE AND RESEARCH, 2024, 86
  • [49] Contribution of noninvasive evaluation to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients
    Miron, MJ
    Perrier, A
    Bounameaux, H
    de Moerloose, P
    Slosman, DO
    Didier, D
    Junod, A
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1999, 13 (06) : 1365 - 1370
  • [50] Time to diagnostic certainty for saddle pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients
    Pinevich, Yuliya
    Barwise, Amelia K.
    Austin, John Matthew
    Soleimani, Jalal
    Herasevich, Svetlana
    Redmond, Sarah
    Dong, Yue
    Herasevich, Vitaly
    Gajic, Ognjen
    Pickering, Brian W.
    BIOMOLECULES AND BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 23 (04): : 671 - 679