Impact of public investment on agricultural productivity growth: Evidence from China

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Siqi [1 ]
Cai, Rong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shujuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Food & Strateg Reserv, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Coll Food Sci & Engn, Collaborat Ctr Modern Grain Circulat & Safety, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Agricultural productivity; Hundred Billion Program; Four-component stochastic frontier model; Staggered difference-in-difference; FOOD SECURITY; SELF-SUFFICIENCY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLICY; INEFFICIENCY; PERSISTENT; REFORMS; TECHNOLOGY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eap.2025.02.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on a balanced panel dataset of 1924 counties in China from 2000 to 2021, we first evaluated the agricultural productivity using a four-component stochastic frontier model, and then employed a staggered difference-in-difference (DID) analytical framework to assess the impact of the Hundred Billion Program (HBP), a large-scale public investment in agriculture, on the growth of China's agricultural productivity. The results indicate that the HBP has a significant positive effect on agricultural productivity growth in counties where the program was implemented. Further heterogeneity analysis reveals that the HBP has predominantly positive effects on agricultural productivity growth in counties located in the Central region, as well as those with low topographic relief or low temperatures. In contrast, no significant effects were observed in counties located in the Northeastern region. Mechanism analysis suggests that public investment in agriculture not only enhances agricultural productivity by improving irrigation infrastructure and increasing agricultural machinery, but also by encouraging scaled agricultural operations. Therefore, increasing public investment in agriculture is crucial for the growth of agricultural productivity. In this regard, China's practices are worthy of emulation by other developing countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1442 / 1455
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of Enterprise IT Investment on Corporate Performance: Evidence from China
    Ji, Peinan
    Yan, Xiangbin
    Yu, Guang
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 23 (03) : 176 - 190
  • [42] The impact of board structure and executive incentive methods on the growth of agricultural enterprises: evidence from China
    Liu Shan
    Zhang Kun
    Journal of Data, Information and Management, 2023, 5 (4): : 243 - 254
  • [43] How Public Service Investment Affects Public Incomes: Evidence from Shanghai, China
    Wang, Yu
    Li, Jingqian
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [44] Impact of public research investments on agricultural productivity in Chile
    Guesmi, Bouali
    Monje, Juan Hernan Cabas
    Alfaro Valenzuela, Marta
    Gil, Jose M.
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2024, 40 (01) : 277 - 298
  • [45] Public appeal, environmental regulation and green investment: Evidence from China
    Liao, Xianchun
    Shi, Xunpeng
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 119 : 554 - 562
  • [46] The impact of digitalization on labor productivity evolution: evidence from China
    Song, Malin
    Tao, Weiliang
    Shen, Zhiyang
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM TECHNOLOGY, 2022,
  • [47] The Impact of the Internet on Industrial Green Productivity: Evidence from China
    Yu, Binbin
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 177
  • [48] The impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and agricultural loan recovery; evidence from a developing economy
    Wahab, Fakhrul
    Khan, Majid Jamal
    Khan, Muhammad Yar
    Mushtaq, Rukhshanda
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (10) : 24777 - 24790
  • [49] Exporting Firm Dynamics and Productivity Growth: Evidence from China
    Huang, Xiaobing
    Liu, Xiaolian
    ECONOMICS-THE OPEN ACCESS OPEN-ASSESSMENT E-JOURNAL, 2016, 10
  • [50] Does outsourcing affect agricultural productivity of farmer households? Evidence from China
    Deng, Xin
    Xu, Dingde
    Zeng, Miao
    Qi, Yanbin
    CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 12 (04) : 673 - 688