A quantitative analysis of ATF surface characteristics on critical heat flux using Machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Serrao, Bruno P. [1 ]
Huh, Ye Kwon [2 ]
Ciuperca, Eliot [1 ]
Sahin, Elvan [1 ]
Liu, Kaibo [2 ]
Duarte, Juliana P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Nucl Engn & Engn Phys, 1500 Engn Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, 1513 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
Accident-tolerant fuels; Surface characteristics; Machine learning; Random forest; POOL BOILING CHF; ROUGHNESS; WATER; MODEL; ENHANCEMENT; WETTABILITY; ORIENTATION; NANOFLUID; PLATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.113924
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The effects of surface characteristics on pool boiling Critical Heat Flux (CHF) are qualitatively understood based on previous investigations. However, more quantitative analyses are needed since the existing CHF correlations do not provide good predictions for modified surfaces. Using machine learning (ML) models as a tool, this study performed a quantitative analysis of relevant CHF parameters under pool boiling conditions: pressure, a dimensional feature, average roughness, static contact angle, surface orientation, and substrate thermal effusivity. A database was constructed by collecting accident tolerant fuels (ATF) CHF experimental data available from fourteen published studies. After hyperparameter optimization, the random forest (RF) model was selected for achieving the best fitting scores relative to other tested models. Feature importance models ranked static contact angle and pressure as the most important features, which is consistent with some of the literature CHF predictive models that take the surface characteristics into consideration. Finally, CHF predictions were obtained and compared to CHF experimental data. The effect of each feature on CHF was analyzed, while keeping other features fixed, by observing the experimental and predicted datapoints trends. The RF model demonstrated the ability to capture the experimental data trends, showing the RF model is suitable as a predictive pool boiling CHF model for this database.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction of critical heat flux using different methods: A review from empirical correlations to the cutting-edge machine learning
    Li, Junfeng
    Huang, Yanxu
    Qiu, Yunyu
    Wang, Shixian
    Yang, Qunhui
    Wang, Kai
    Zhu, Yunzhong
    INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2025, 160
  • [22] Heat flux for semilocal machine-learning potentials
    Langer M.F.
    Knoop F.
    Carbogno C.
    Scheffler M.
    Rupp M.
    Physical Review B, 2023, 108 (10)
  • [24] Quantitative Investment Based on Fundamental Analysis Using Machine Learning
    Zhang, Zhiruo
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY, ICCMT 2024, 2024, : 509 - 515
  • [25] Uncertainty quantification study of the physics-informed machine learning models for critical heat flux prediction
    Mao, Congshan
    Jin, Yue
    Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2024, 170
  • [26] Uncertainty quantification study of the physics-informed machine learning models for critical heat flux prediction
    Mao, Congshan
    Jin, Yue
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2024, 170
  • [27] Investigation of Machine Learning Regression Techniques to Predict Critical Heat Flux Over a Large Parameter Space
    Helmryd Grosfilley, Emil
    Robertson, Gustav
    Soibam, Jerol
    Le Corre, Jean-Marie
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [28] Effect of heat-transfer surface structure on critical heat flux
    Asano, Hitoshi
    Kawasaki, Kei
    Takenaka, Nobuyuki
    Multiphase Science and Technology, 2012, 24 (03) : 181 - 196
  • [29] Visualization-based nucleate boiling heat flux quantification using machine learning
    Hobold, Gustavo M.
    da Silva, Alexandre K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2019, 134 : 511 - 520
  • [30] Prediction of critical heat flux using ANFIS
    Zaferanlouei, Salman
    Rostamifard, Dariush
    Setayeshi, Saeed
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2010, 37 (06) : 813 - 821