Global extent and change in human modification of terrestrial ecosystems from 1990 to 2022

被引:0
|
作者
David M. Theobald [1 ]
James R. Oakleaf [2 ]
Glenn Moncrieff [3 ]
Maria Voigt [4 ]
Joe Kiesecker [5 ]
Christina M. Kennedy [3 ]
机构
[1] Conservation Planning Technologies,Dept. of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology
[2] Colorado State University,Global Protect Oceans, Lands and Waters
[3] The Nature Conservancy,Global Science
[4] The Nature Conservancy,Global Science
[5] The Nature Conservancy,Global Science
[6] The Nature Conservancy,undefined
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41597-025-04892-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Habitat loss and degradation associated with industrial development is the primary threat and dominant driver of biodiversity loss globally. Spatially-explicit datasets that estimate human pressures are essential to understand the extent and rate of anthropogenic impacts on ecosystems and are critical to inform conservation commitments and efforts under the Global Biodiversity Framework. We leveraged the human modification framework to generate comprehensive, consistent, detailed, robust, temporal, and contemporary datasets to map cumulative and individual threats associated with industrial human activities to terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystems from 1990 to 2022. In ~2022, 43% of terrestrial lands had very low levels of modification, while 27%, 20%, and 10% had low, moderate, and high modification, respectively. Nearly 2/3 of biomes and 1/2 of ecoregions currently are moderately-modified, and 24% of terrestrial ecosystems (31 M km2) experienced increased modification from 1990 to 2020. About 29% of countries and 31% of ecoregions might also be particularly vulnerable to biodiversity loss given their above-average increased modification and less than 30% protection.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unraveling the impact of global change on glomalin and implications for soil carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems
    Singh, Ashutosh Kumar
    Chen, Chunfeng
    Zhu, Xiai
    Yang, Bin
    Khan, Muhammad Numan
    Zakari, Sissou
    Jiang, Xiao Jin
    Alguacil, Maria del Mar
    Liu, Wenjie
    RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 18
  • [32] Trait-Based Modeling of Terrestrial Ecosystems: Advances and Challenges Under Global Change
    Xiangtao Xu
    Anna T. Trugman
    Current Climate Change Reports, 2021, 7 : 1 - 13
  • [33] Trait-Based Modeling of Terrestrial Ecosystems: Advances and Challenges Under Global Change
    Xu, Xiangtao
    Trugman, Anna T.
    CURRENT CLIMATE CHANGE REPORTS, 2021, 7 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [34] RESPONSE OF THE TERRESTRIAL BIOSPHERE TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE AND HUMAN PERTURBATION
    SCHLESINGER, WH
    VEGETATIO, 1993, 104 : 295 - 305
  • [35] Impacts of global change on peak vegetation growth and its timing in terrestrial ecosystems of the continental US
    Liu, Ying
    Wu, Chaoyang
    Wang, Xiaoyue
    Jassal, Rachhpal S.
    Gonsamo, Alemu
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2021, 207
  • [36] Biological stoichiometry: from bacteria to ecosystems to global change.
    Cotner, JB
    Makino, W
    Hall, EK
    INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 42 (06) : 1213 - 1213
  • [37] A scientific approach to employ monitoring and modelling techniques for global change and terrestrial ecosystems and other related projects
    Kozoderov, VV
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 1995, 22 (4-5) : 927 - 933
  • [38] Consequences of global change in coastal ecosystems from a multidisciplinary perspective
    Silva, Rodolfo
    Chavez, Valeria
    Mori, Nobuhito
    Bouma, Tjeerd J.
    Oderiz, Itxaso
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 9
  • [39] Global forest resilience change from 2001 to 2022
    Guo, Jing
    Zhu, Zhiliang
    Gong, Peng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 45 (17) : 5889 - 5900
  • [40] Responses and feedbacks of coupled biogeochemical cycles to climate change: examples from terrestrial ecosystems
    Finzi, Adrien C.
    Austin, Amy T.
    Cleland, Elsa E.
    Frey, Serita D.
    Houlton, Benjamin Z.
    Wallenstein, Matthew D.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 9 (01) : 61 - 67