Clinical effectiveness of progestogens compared to combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Gaio, Giovana de Souza [1 ]
Kemczenski, Frederico [1 ]
Amador, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira [2 ]
Farias, Caroline Freitas [3 ]
Chagas, Junea [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Joinvilles Reg, Dept Med, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, Pe, Brazil
[3] Marilia Med Sch, Dept Med, Marilia, SP, Brazil
[4] Fac Med Sci Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
Endometriosis; Progestogens; Combined oral contraceptives; Pelvic pain; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PELVIC PAIN; PATHOGENESIS; DIENOGEST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.033
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Endometriosis involves the growth of endometrium-like cells outside the uterus, affecting reproductiveaged women. Symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility significantly impair quality of life. Among therapeutic options, progestogens have demonstrated efficacy in managing pain and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pills in alleviating pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and associated side effects. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with the last search conducted in October 2024. The review was registered under PROSPERO registration number CRD42024609658. Studies were included regardless of language, publication year, or country. Articles not comparing progestogens and combined oral contraceptives or lacking relevant outcomes were excluded, as were abstracts, theses, case reports, opinion pieces, and correspondence. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for randomized studies. Results: Seven studies, including 948 patients (476 receiving progestogens), met inclusion criteria. The metaanalysis found no significant differences between progestogens and COCPs for pelvic pain (SMD = 0.02; 95 % CI: -0.37 to 0.40; P = 0.04; I2 = 66.7 %), dysmenorrhea (SMD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.19 to 0.19), dyspareunia (SMD = 0.21; 95 % CI: -0.42 to 0.85; P = 0.02; I2 = 81.4 %), or psychological health (SMD = 0.01; 95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.23; P = 0.19; I2 = 39.1 %). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in side effects, including breast tenderness, weight gain, amenorrhea, and bleeding. Conclusion: Progestogens and COCPs demonstrate comparable efficacy in managing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and psychological health, with similar side effect profiles. These findings suggest both treatments are equally effective options for symptom management in endometriosis.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Adverse Effects of Levonorgestrel Emergency Oral Contraceptive
    Nattawut Leelakanok
    Janthima Methaneethorn
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2020, 40 : 395 - 420
  • [22] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Adverse Effects of Levonorgestrel Emergency Oral Contraceptive
    Leelakanok, Nattawut
    Methaneethorn, Janthima
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2020, 40 (05) : 395 - 420
  • [23] Efficacy and safety of Gushen Antai Pills combined with dydrogesterone in the treatment of threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Kai
    Liu, Xiaoxia
    Meng, Xianhua
    Li, Hui
    Yang, Chenchen
    Wang, Xiaohong
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [24] Xi huang pills enhance the tumor treatment efficacy when combined with chemotherapy: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Guo, Qiujun
    Xu, Xinyao
    He, Shulin
    Yuan, Yuan
    Chen, Shuntai
    Hua, Baojin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 14 : S1012 - +
  • [25] Endometriosis and cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kvaskoff, Marina
    Mahamat-Saleh, Yahya
    Farland, Leslie, V
    Shigesi, Nina
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    Harris, Holly R.
    Roman, Horace
    Becker, Christian M.
    As-Sanie, Sawsan
    Zondervan, Krina T.
    Horne, Andrew W.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2021, 27 (02) : 393 - 420
  • [26] Acupuncture for endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giese, Nora
    Kwon, Ki Kyung
    Armour, Mike
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (04)
  • [27] Systematic review and Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of dienogest in treatment of endometriosis
    Shao-Chong Lin
    Xin-Yue Wang
    Xi-Ling Fu
    Wen-Hui Yang
    Han Wu
    Yang Bai
    Zhong-Na Shi
    Jun-Peng Du
    Bao-Jin Wang
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2021, 9 (04) : 377 - 388
  • [28] In vivo effectiveness and safety of probiotics on prophylaxis and treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Lijun
    Zhou, Mimi
    Young, Andrew
    Zhao, Weiwei
    Yan, Zhimin
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [29] In vivo effectiveness and safety of probiotics on prophylaxis and treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lijun Hu
    Mimi Zhou
    Andrew Young
    Weiwei Zhao
    Zhimin Yan
    BMC Oral Health, 19
  • [30] Effectiveness of combined pregabalin and celecoxib for treatment of acute postoperative pain: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ni, Jing-Mei
    Zhu, Xuan
    Wang, Ping
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (52)