Clinical effectiveness of progestogens compared to combined oral contraceptive pills in the treatment of endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Gaio, Giovana de Souza [1 ]
Kemczenski, Frederico [1 ]
Amador, Wellgner Fernandes Oliveira [2 ]
Farias, Caroline Freitas [3 ]
Chagas, Junea [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Joinvilles Reg, Dept Med, Joinville, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Cajazeiras, Pe, Brazil
[3] Marilia Med Sch, Dept Med, Marilia, SP, Brazil
[4] Fac Med Sci Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
Endometriosis; Progestogens; Combined oral contraceptives; Pelvic pain; DEPOT MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE; PELVIC PAIN; PATHOGENESIS; DIENOGEST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.033
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Endometriosis involves the growth of endometrium-like cells outside the uterus, affecting reproductiveaged women. Symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and infertility significantly impair quality of life. Among therapeutic options, progestogens have demonstrated efficacy in managing pain and reducing recurrence rates. This study aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of progestogens versus combined oral contraceptive pills in alleviating pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and associated side effects. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with the last search conducted in October 2024. The review was registered under PROSPERO registration number CRD42024609658. Studies were included regardless of language, publication year, or country. Articles not comparing progestogens and combined oral contraceptives or lacking relevant outcomes were excluded, as were abstracts, theses, case reports, opinion pieces, and correspondence. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 for randomized studies. Results: Seven studies, including 948 patients (476 receiving progestogens), met inclusion criteria. The metaanalysis found no significant differences between progestogens and COCPs for pelvic pain (SMD = 0.02; 95 % CI: -0.37 to 0.40; P = 0.04; I2 = 66.7 %), dysmenorrhea (SMD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.19 to 0.19), dyspareunia (SMD = 0.21; 95 % CI: -0.42 to 0.85; P = 0.02; I2 = 81.4 %), or psychological health (SMD = 0.01; 95 % CI: -0.21 to 0.23; P = 0.19; I2 = 39.1 %). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in side effects, including breast tenderness, weight gain, amenorrhea, and bleeding. Conclusion: Progestogens and COCPs demonstrate comparable efficacy in managing pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and psychological health, with similar side effect profiles. These findings suggest both treatments are equally effective options for symptom management in endometriosis.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 225
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral contraceptive pills for endometriosis after conservative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Lixia
    Wu, Qianyu
    Liu, Lan
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 29 (10) : 883 - 890
  • [2] Metformin and Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills in the Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Melin, Johanna
    Forslund, Maria
    Alesi, Simon
    Piltonen, Terhi
    Romualdi, Daniela
    Spritzer, Poli Mara
    Tay, Chau Thien
    Pena, Alexia
    Witchel, Selma Feldman
    Mousa, Aya
    Teede, Helena
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2024, 109 (02): : e817 - e836
  • [3] Use of different kinds of combined oral contraceptive pills in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Forslund, Maria
    Melin, Johanna
    Alesi, Simon
    Piltonen, Terhi
    Romualdi, Daniela
    Tay, Chau Thien
    Witchel, Selma
    Pena, Alexia
    Mousa, Aya
    Teede, Helena
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 102 : 78 - 78
  • [4] Oral Contraceptive Pills as Primary Prevention for Ovarian Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Moorman, Patricia G.
    Lowery, William J.
    Gierisch, Jennifer M.
    Coeytaux, Remy R.
    Urrutia, Rachel Peragallo
    Dinan, Michaela
    McBroom, Amanda J.
    Hasselblad, Vic
    Sanders, Gillian D.
    Myers, Evan R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01): : 139 - 147
  • [5] Oral Contraceptive Pills as Primary Prevention for Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hatzipetros, Ioannis
    Gocze, Peter M.
    Farkas, Balint
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (05): : 1114 - 1114
  • [6] The association between oral contraceptive pills and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arshadi, Maedeh
    Hesari, Elahe
    Ahmadinezhad, Mozhgan
    Yekta, Elahe Mansouri
    Ebrahimi, Fateme
    Azizi, Hosein
    Esfarjani, Shahla Vaziri
    Rostami, Maryam
    Khodamoradi, Farzad
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2024, 111 (10) : 918 - 929
  • [7] Different kinds of oral contraceptive pills in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Forslund, Maria
    Melin, Johanna
    Alesi, Simon
    Piltonen, Terhi
    Romualdi, Daniela
    Tay, Chau Thien
    Witchel, Selma
    Pena, Alexia
    Mousa, Aya
    Teede, Helena
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 189 (01) : S1 - S16
  • [8] Nystatin Effectiveness in Oral Candidiasis Treatment: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Rai, Anamika
    Misra, Satya Ranjan
    Panda, Saurav
    Sokolowski, Grzegorz
    Mishra, Lora
    Das, Rupsa
    Lapinska, Barbara
    LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [9] Effectiveness and acceptability of progestogens in combined oral contraceptives - A systematic review
    Kulier R.
    Helmerhorst F.M.
    Maitra N.
    Metin Gülmezoglu A.
    Reproductive Health, 1 (1)
  • [10] Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of gestrinone in the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luiz Paulo de Souza Pinto
    Gustavo Ferrari
    Isis Kelly dos Santos
    Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Roesler
    Izabelle de Mello Gindri
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2023, 307 : 21 - 37