Effect of ESG rating disagreement on stock price informativeness: Empirical evidence from China's capital market

被引:0
|
作者
Hu, Kexin [1 ]
Li, Xingyi [2 ]
Li, Zhongfei [3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat sen Univ, Sch Business, 135 Xingang Rd West, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Econ, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Business Sch, 1088 Taoyuan Rd, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ESG rating disagreement; Stock Price synchronicity; Firm transparency; Agency costs; FIRM-SPECIFIC INFORMATION; AGENCY COSTS; SYNCHRONICITY; PERFORMANCE; DISCLOSURE; OWNERSHIP; ANALYSTS; INDUSTRY; OPACITY; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103651
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We assess the level of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) rating disagreement among Chinese listed companies using ESG data from eight ESG rating providers and examine the impact of ESG rating disagreement on stock price informativeness. Our results indicate a significant and positive correlation between ESG rating disagreement and stock price synchronicity. This suggests that different ESG ratings impede the integration of company-specific details into stock prices, thereby reducing the stock price's informativeness. The opacity of corporate information and agency costs can both be used to interpret this result. We also explore the transmission channels through which ESG rating disagreement affects stock price informativeness. Our findings reveal that such disagreement lowers the quality of analysts' predictions and impedes investors' access to information, affecting the informativeness of stock prices. Furthermore, we observe that ESG rating disagreement has a greater impact on stock price synchronicity for companies with high ESG ratings and those operating in highly competitive industries. Increased media coverage would mitigate the effect of ESG rating disagreement on stock price synchronicity. Overall, our findings contribute to the literature on ESG rating disagreement and demonstrate the critical role of ESG rating disagreement in the informativeness of stock prices.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Product market competition, stock price informativeness, and IFRS adoption: evidence from Europe
    Jing Wang
    Wei Li
    Arno Forst
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2021, 56 : 1537 - 1559
  • [32] ESG rating disagreement portfolios - Evidence from the EuroStoxx 600
    Horky, Florian
    Pasquali, Andrea
    Magazzino, Cosimo
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 69
  • [33] Product market competition, stock price informativeness, and IFRS adoption: evidence from Europe
    Wang, Jing
    Li, Wei
    Forst, Arno
    REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2021, 56 (04) : 1537 - 1559
  • [34] Oil Price and Stock Market: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria
    Olufisayo, Akinlo Olayinka
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 3 (02): : 33 - 40
  • [35] The Effect of Stock Liquidity on Default Risk: An Empirical Study of China's Capital Market
    Li, Kun
    Yan, Qinqin
    Lei, Yu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL 2, 2020, 1002 : 93 - 104
  • [36] Asymmetric Synchronicity in Extreme Stock Price Movements: Evidence from China's Stock Market
    Liu, Yang
    Yang, Xiaoguang
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, ITQM 2017, 2017, 122 : 1156 - 1161
  • [38] Stock market liberalization and ESG performance: evidence from China connect
    He, Guohua
    Wang, Zhaolin
    Yu, Jingwen
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024,
  • [39] Does mandatory CSR disclosure improve stock price informativeness? Evidence from China
    Guo, Chunying
    Yang, Baochen
    Fan, Ying
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2022, 62
  • [40] Stock Price Informativeness and Idiosyncratic Return Volatility in Emerging Markets: Evidence from China
    Lin, Karen Jingrong
    Karim, Khondkar
    Carter, Clairmont
    REVIEW OF PACIFIC BASIN FINANCIAL MARKETS AND POLICIES, 2014, 17 (04)