Acceptability testing of the Carers-ID intervention to support the mental health of family carers of people with profound and multiple intellectual disabilities

被引:0
|
作者
Linden, Mark [1 ]
Truesdale, Maria [2 ]
Leonard, Rachel Aine [1 ]
Brown, Michael [1 ]
Marsh, Lynne [1 ]
Todd, Stuart [3 ]
Hughes, N. [4 ]
Forbes, Trisha [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Belfast, North Ireland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Hlth & Wellbeing, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Univ South Wales, Sch Care Sci, Caerleon, Wales
[4] Univ Sheffield, Dept Sociol Studies, Sheffield, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 10期
关键词
FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0313081
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Providing care and support for a person with intellectual disabilities can be challenging and may negatively impact on family carers' health and wellbeing. A online support programme was co-designed with charitable organisations and family carers, to help meet the mental health and wellbeing needs of family carers.Objective To test the acceptability of a newly developed online support programme for carers of people with profound and multiple intellectual disabilities.Methods A sequential mixed-methods explanatory design was utilised. An adapted version of the Acceptability of Health Apps among Adolescents Scale was distributed to family carers across the United Kingdom and Ireland who had viewed the Carers-ID.com intervention. Participants were then invited to take part in an online interview. Qualitative and quantitative data were analysed separately and then brought together through the triangulation protocol.Results Seventy family carers (47 female, 23 male) responded to the acceptability survey, with 10 (7 female, 3 male) taking part in interviews. Carers expressed high levels of programme acceptability (mean = 75.43 out of 88). Six themes were generated from interviews with family carers; i) time is precious, ii) the breadth and depth of module content, iii) it was somebody's experience; it was meaningful, iv) won't work for everyone, v) representation: people I could identify with, and vi) module specific suggestions for future changes. Based on our triangulation, four areas of convergence were identified: programme usability and ease, attitudes towards the programme, perceptions of effectiveness, and programme relatability.Conclusions To be acceptable, online interventions for carers of people with intellectual disability need to be accessible, understandable and easy to use, as carers' free time can be limited. It would be important to investigate the effectiveness of online interventions for family carers, specifically considering which carers the intervention works for, and for whom it may not.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INTERNET USE FOR FAMILY CARERS OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NARRATIVE ANALYSIS
    Caton, S.
    Koivunen, E. -R.
    Allison, C.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (07) : 754 - 754
  • [42] Self stigma in people with intellectual disabilities and courtesy stigma in family carers: A systematic review
    Ali, Afia
    Hassiotis, Angela
    Strydorn, Andre
    King, Michael
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2012, 33 (06) : 2122 - 2140
  • [43] DIGITAL WELLBEING INTERVENTIONS FOR FAMILY CARERS OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL OR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Apanasionok, M.
    Paris, A.
    Griffin, J.
    Flynn, S.
    Austin, D.
    Finch, E.
    Hastings, R.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (07) : 739 - 739
  • [44] Issues in caregiving for older people with intellectual disabilities and their ageing family carers: a review and commentary
    Ryan, Assumpta
    Taggart, Laurence
    Truesdale-Kennedy, Maria
    Slevin, Eamonn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OLDER PEOPLE NURSING, 2014, 9 (03) : 217 - 226
  • [45] REVIEWING THE EVIDENCE FOR WEB-BASED INTERVENTIONS FOR FAMILY CARERS OF PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
    Forbes, Trisha
    Brown, Michael
    Marsh, Lynne
    Truesdale, Maria
    McCann, Eddie
    Todd, Stuart
    Hughes, Nathan
    Linden, Mark
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2022, 76 : A65 - A65
  • [46] Internet use for family carers of people with intellectual disabilities: A literature review and thematic synthesis
    Caton, Sue
    Koivunen, Emma-Reetta
    Allison, Callum
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2019, 23 (03) : 446 - 468
  • [47] How do parents and carers of young people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) (14-28 years) construe mental well-being?
    Phillip, M
    Hogg, J
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2004, 48 : 360 - 360
  • [48] PROBLEMS EXPERIENCED BY SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS IN THE SUPPORT OF PEOPLE WITH PROFOUND INTELLECTUAL AND MULTIPLE DISABILITIES
    Jansen, S.
    Poppes, P.
    van derPutten, A.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (07) : 819 - 819
  • [49] Planning for the future for family carers of adults with intellectual disabilities (ID): training-the-trainers: a pilot study
    Thompson, A.
    Taggart, L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2014, 27 (04) : 348 - 348
  • [50] Mental health and caregiving experiences of family carers supporting people with psychosis
    Sin, J.
    Elkes, J.
    Batchelor, R.
    Henderson, C.
    Gillard, S.
    Woodham, L. A.
    Chen, T.
    Aden, A.
    Cornelius, V.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2021, 30