Prediction and calibration of black soil modeling parameters based on response surface methodology and machine learning algorithms

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Zhipeng [1 ]
Ma, Feng [2 ]
Zhu, Yaonan [3 ]
Wang, Hongyan [4 ]
Zhu, Tong [1 ]
Wang, Youzhao [1 ]
Zhao, Chaoyue [1 ]
Yu, Jin [5 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Inst Proc Equipment & Environm Engn, Sch Mech Engn & Automat, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[2] Taiyuan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Environm & resources, Taiyuan, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Tokyo, Sch Engn, Tokyo, Japan
[4] China Energy Conservat DADl Environm Remediat Co L, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] China State Sci Dingshi Environm Engn Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
black soil; machine learning; stacking angle; parameter calibration; response surface methodology; DISCRETE-ELEMENT; SIMULATION; DEM;
D O I
10.1080/02726351.2025.2476672
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Five machine learning algorithms Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), KNN, and XG Boost were used to calibrate the discrete element contact parameters of the black soil by combining the measured data on the black soil and the simulated pile load test. Firstly, the physical parameters of the black soil and the angle of stacking were determined based on physical tests. Next, Plackett-Burman tests were carried out and the following important parameters were obtained: black soil-black soil static friction coefficient, black soil-black soil rolling friction coefficient, and black soil-stainless steel rolling friction coefficient. The simulation parameters that significantly influenced the black soil stacking angles were designed for the steepest climbing tests to optimize a range of values of the significant parameters. Machine learning was performed to determine the optimal model based on the results of the response surface index results. The results show that the decision tree model has better predictive ability and stability for the stacking angle compared to Random Forest, SVR, KNN, and XG Boost models. The best combination of parameters for the black soil-black soil static friction coefficient was 0.956, the black soil-black soil rolling friction coefficient was 0.499, and the black soil-stainless steel rolling friction coefficient was 0.221. The simulation parameters can provide a reference for optimizing the simulation parameters for the subsequent soil particles.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling of Oil Bitumen Quality Parameters Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Levchenko, E. N.
    CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY OF FUELS AND OILS, 2024, 59 (06) : 1156 - 1161
  • [32] Data-based modeling for prediction of supercapacitor capacity: Integrated machine learning and metaheuristic algorithms
    Azimi, Hamed
    Kalhor, Ebrahim Ghorbani
    Nabavi, Seyed Reza
    Behbahani, Mohammad
    Vardini, Mohammad Taghi
    JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2025, 170
  • [33] Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
    Pervez, Md. Nahid
    Yeo, Wan Sieng
    Mishu, Mst. Monira Rahman
    Talukder, Md. Eman
    Roy, Hridoy
    Islam, Md. Shahinoor
    Zhao, Yaping
    Cai, Yingjie
    Stylios, George K.
    Naddeo, Vincenzo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [34] Assessment and prediction of water quality indices by machine learning-genetic algorithm and response surface methodology
    Fertikh, Soraya
    Boutaghane, Hamouda
    Boumaaza, Messaouda
    Belaadi, Ahmed
    Bouslah, Soraya
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 10 (04) : 5573 - 5604
  • [35] Electrospun nanofiber membrane diameter prediction using a combined response surface methodology and machine learning approach
    Md. Nahid Pervez
    Wan Sieng Yeo
    Mst. Monira Rahman Mishu
    Md. Eman Talukder
    Hridoy Roy
    Md. Shahinoor Islam
    Yaping Zhao
    Yingjie Cai
    George K. Stylios
    Vincenzo Naddeo
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [36] Hyperparameter Tuning of Machine Learning Algorithms Using Response Surface Methodology: A Case Study of ANN, SVM, and DBN
    Pannakkong, Warut
    Thiwa-Anont, Kwanluck
    Singthong, Kasidit
    Parthanadee, Parthana
    Buddhakulsomsiri, Jirachai
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [37] Modeling and optimization of biomethanation of rice straw with biochar supplementation using response surface methodology and machine learning
    Bhujbal, Sachin Krushna
    Ghosh, Pooja
    Vijay, Virendra Kumar
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2024, 71
  • [38] Optimisation of Numerical Control Tool Cutting Parameters Based on Thermodynamic Response and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Zhang, Nanyang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 41 (04) : 1096 - 1103
  • [39] Prediction of soil water retention curve based on physical characterization parameters using machine learning
    Cunha Albuquerque, Enzo Aldo
    de Faria Borges, Lucas Parreira
    Brasil Cavalcante, Andre Luis
    Machado, Sandro Lemos
    SOILS AND ROCKS, 2022, 45 (03):
  • [40] Suitability Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Crack Growth Prediction Based on Dynamic Response Data
    Omar, Intisar
    Khan, Muhammad
    Starr, Andrew
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (03)