Urethra-preserving and dorsal capsule fenestration with robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe LUTS in small prostate: a case report

被引:0
|
作者
Wen, Lijie [1 ]
Zhang, Yue [1 ]
He, Yi [1 ]
Yu, Yang [1 ]
Yang, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Dalian, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2024年 / 11卷
关键词
small prostate; benign prostatic hyperplasia; minimally invasive treatment; robotassisted laparoscopy; prostatectomy; BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; HYPERPLASIA; INCISION; MADIGAN;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2024.1497556
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Small prostates (volume <30 ml) induce bladder outlet obstruction with pathophysiological changes distinct from those associated with large prostates. Treatment options often include transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Existing treatments have issues with high recurrence and complication rates. Therefore, we aim to explore a new minimally invasive surgical approach for patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and a small prostate. Methods: A patient with severe LUTS and a small prostate was admitted to the Department of Urology at the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University. The patient had no median lobe but presented with multiple bladder stones. Relevant data (IPSS score, urine flow rate, operation time, hemoglobin drop, catheterization time, hospitalization time, residual urine) were collected before and after surgery to assess the safety and efficiency. Results: The patient was 72 years old with a prostate volume of 22.14 ml, a preoperative IPSS score of 28, PSA of 0.314 ng/ml, maximum urine flow rate of 3.5 ml/s, and a prostate MRI PI-RADS score of 2. The patient underwent robot-assisted cystolithotomy, urethra-preserving prostatectomy and dorsal capsule fenestration. The surgery lasted 105 min, with a postoperative hemoglobin drop of 3 g/L. There was no continuous bladder irrigation postoperatively, and the catheter was removed after 10 days. The patient was hospitalized for 4 days and followed up for 24 months. At 6 months postoperative, the patient had an IPSS score of 6, a QoL score of 1, a urine flow rate of 18 ml/s, and residual urine of 8 ml, with nocturia occurring 1-2 times. At 24 months postoperative, the patient had an IPSS score of 7, a QoL score of 1, a urine flow rate of 21 ml/s, and residual urine of 15 ml, with nocturia occurring 1 time. Conclusion: Robot-assisted urethra-preserving prostatectomy and dorsal capsule fenestration is a promising alternative treatment for patient with severe LUTS due to a small prostate in both long-term safety and efficacy. Further large-sample controlled studies are needed for additional evaluation and validation.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Severe subcutaneous emphysema caused by small injury to the abdominal wall during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Fukui, Shinji
    Kagebayashi, Yoriaki
    Iemura, Yusuke
    Matsumura, Yoshiaki
    UROLOGY CASE REPORTS, 2022, 40
  • [32] Severe Hyperkalemia During a Robot-Assisted Total Radical Prostatectomy in a Patient with Stage 3a Chronic Kidney Disease: A Case Report
    Gebara, Sebastien
    Adans-Dester, Gilles
    Bairy, Laurent
    A & A PRACTICE, 2024, 18 (03) : E01760
  • [33] Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy vs Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Trials
    Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
    Hartung, Friedrich Otto
    von Hardenberg, Jost
    Haney, Caelan M.
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Nuhn, Philipp
    Patroi, Paul
    Westhoff, Niklas
    Honeck, Patrick
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    Herrmann, Jonas
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (08) : 1018 - 1028
  • [34] Re: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate and Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy Editorial Comment
    Kaplan, Steven A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (03): : 416 - 416
  • [35] PROSTATE VOLUME DOES NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT THE RISK OF POST-SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY
    Steinberg, Ryan
    Johnson, Brett
    Roehrborn, Claus
    Gahan, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E640 - E640
  • [36] Treatment of prostatic stromal sarcoma with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a young adult: A case report
    Mao, Qi-Qi
    Wang, Shuo
    Wang, Ping
    Qin, Jie
    Xia, Dan
    Xie, Li-Ping
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 11 (04) : 2542 - 2544
  • [37] Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy for Giant Multilocular Prostatic Cystadenoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Scarcia, Marcello
    Moretto, Stefano
    Zazzara, Michele
    Alba, Stefano
    Fiorentino, Alba
    Ciampi, Luigia
    Ludovico, Elena
    Calbi, Roberto
    Ludovico, Giuseppe M.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2023, 107 (10-12) : 983 - 987
  • [38] Effectiveness of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Renal Transplant Recipient: a Case Report
    Kobari, Yuki
    Iizuka, Junpei
    Hata, Keisuke
    Kato, Shinya
    Minoda, Ryo
    Yoshida, Kazuhiko
    Ishida, Hideki
    Nagashima, Yoji
    Tanabe, Kazunari
    Takagi, Toshio
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 54 (02) : 525 - 527
  • [39] Incorporating VR-RENDER Fusion Software in Robot-Assisted Partial Prostatectomy: The First Case Report
    Yang, Che-Hsueh
    Chen, Li-Hsun
    Lin, Yi-Sheng
    Hsu, Chao-Yu
    Tung, Min-Che
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Wu, Chi-Hsiang
    Ou, Yen-Chuan
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (02) : 1699 - 1707
  • [40] First case report of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer that developed after salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Oka, Suguru
    Sakaguchi, Kazushige
    Hayashida, Michikata
    Ito, Shinji
    Kurosawa, Kazuhiro
    Urakami, Shinji
    IJU CASE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (05) : 310 - 313