Urethra-preserving and dorsal capsule fenestration with robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe LUTS in small prostate: a case report

被引:0
|
作者
Wen, Lijie [1 ]
Zhang, Yue [1 ]
He, Yi [1 ]
Yu, Yang [1 ]
Yang, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Dalian, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2024年 / 11卷
关键词
small prostate; benign prostatic hyperplasia; minimally invasive treatment; robotassisted laparoscopy; prostatectomy; BLADDER OUTLET OBSTRUCTION; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; HYPERPLASIA; INCISION; MADIGAN;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2024.1497556
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Small prostates (volume <30 ml) induce bladder outlet obstruction with pathophysiological changes distinct from those associated with large prostates. Treatment options often include transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Existing treatments have issues with high recurrence and complication rates. Therefore, we aim to explore a new minimally invasive surgical approach for patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and a small prostate. Methods: A patient with severe LUTS and a small prostate was admitted to the Department of Urology at the Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University. The patient had no median lobe but presented with multiple bladder stones. Relevant data (IPSS score, urine flow rate, operation time, hemoglobin drop, catheterization time, hospitalization time, residual urine) were collected before and after surgery to assess the safety and efficiency. Results: The patient was 72 years old with a prostate volume of 22.14 ml, a preoperative IPSS score of 28, PSA of 0.314 ng/ml, maximum urine flow rate of 3.5 ml/s, and a prostate MRI PI-RADS score of 2. The patient underwent robot-assisted cystolithotomy, urethra-preserving prostatectomy and dorsal capsule fenestration. The surgery lasted 105 min, with a postoperative hemoglobin drop of 3 g/L. There was no continuous bladder irrigation postoperatively, and the catheter was removed after 10 days. The patient was hospitalized for 4 days and followed up for 24 months. At 6 months postoperative, the patient had an IPSS score of 6, a QoL score of 1, a urine flow rate of 18 ml/s, and residual urine of 8 ml, with nocturia occurring 1-2 times. At 24 months postoperative, the patient had an IPSS score of 7, a QoL score of 1, a urine flow rate of 21 ml/s, and residual urine of 15 ml, with nocturia occurring 1 time. Conclusion: Robot-assisted urethra-preserving prostatectomy and dorsal capsule fenestration is a promising alternative treatment for patient with severe LUTS due to a small prostate in both long-term safety and efficacy. Further large-sample controlled studies are needed for additional evaluation and validation.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Urethra-Sparing Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Postoperative Antegrade Ejaculation
    Choi, Sae Woong
    Sohn, Dong Wan
    Ha, U-Syn
    Hong, Sung-Hoo
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Cho, Hyuk Jin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (14)
  • [2] Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy for Severe Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Sutherland, Douglas E.
    Perez, Deo S.
    Weeks, D. Champ
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (04) : 641 - 644
  • [3] Successful Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy Years After a Prostate Artery Embolization: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Moreland, Kale
    Yankelevich, Gabrielle R.
    Womble, Paul
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [4] A Case of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Primary Small Cell Prostate Cancer
    Kim, Ki Hong
    Park, Sang Un
    Jang, Jee Young
    Park, Won Kyu
    Oh, Cheol Kyu
    Rha, Koon Ho
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (12) : 882 - 884
  • [5] Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate Is Better than Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (02): : 365 - 367
  • [6] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY FOR AN ENLARGED PROSTATE: INITIAL EXPERIENCE
    Yates, J.
    Esposito, M.
    Nazmy, M.
    Ahmed, M.
    Lanteri, V.
    Lasalle, M. D.
    Lovallo, G.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A251 - A251
  • [7] A systematic review of robot-assisted simple prostatectomy outcomes by prostate volume
    Morozov, Andrey
    Bogatova, Svetlana
    Bezrukov, Evgeny
    Singla, Nirmish
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Spivak, Leonid
    Rivas, Juan Gomes
    Lusuardi, Lukas
    Gauhar, Vineet
    Somani, Bhaskar
    Lifshitz, David
    Baniel, Jack
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [8] Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy Is Better than Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Amparore, Daniele
    Loizzo, Davide
    Pandolfo, Savio D.
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (02): : 368 - 370
  • [9] Urethra and Ejaculation Preserving Robot-assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Near-infrared Fluorescence Imaging-guided Madigan Technique
    Simone, Giuseppe
    Misuraca, Leonardo
    Anceschi, Umberto
    Minisola, Francesco
    Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia
    Guaglianone, Salvatore
    Tuderti, Gabriele
    Gallucci, Michele
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (03) : 492 - 497
  • [10] Robot-assisted spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: case report
    Kauffmann, Emanuele Federico
    Napoli, Niccolo
    Menonna, Francesca
    Cacace, Concetta
    Genovese, Valerio
    Vistoli, Fabio
    Boggi, Ugo
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2021, 6