Integrating Remote Sensing and Soil Features for Enhanced Machine Learning-Based Corn Yield Prediction in the Southern US

被引:0
|
作者
Sarkar, Sayantan [1 ]
Osorio Leyton, Javier M. [1 ]
Noa-Yarasca, Efrain [1 ]
Adhikari, Kabindra [2 ]
Hajda, Chad B. [2 ]
Smith, Douglas R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M AgriLife Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] United States Dept Agr, Agr Res Serv, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, Temple, TX 76502 USA
关键词
corn; maize; yield prediction; machine learning; vegetation indices; ensemble methods; LEAF PIGMENT CONTENT; VEGETATION INDEX; SPECTRAL REFLECTANCE; CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT; AREA INDEX; WHEAT; CANOPY; GRAIN; WATER; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3390/s25020543
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Efficient and reliable corn (Zea mays L.) yield prediction is important for varietal selection by plant breeders and management decision-making by growers. Unlike prior studies that focus mainly on county-level or controlled laboratory-scale areas, this study targets a production-scale area, better representing real-world agricultural conditions and offering more practical relevance for farmers. Therefore, the objective of our study was to determine the best combination of vegetation indices and abiotic factors for predicting corn yield in a rain-fed, production-scale area, identify the most suitable corn growth stage for yield estimation using machine learning, and identify the most effective machine learning model for corn yield estimation. Our study used high-resolution (6 cm) aerial multispectral imagery. Sixty-two different predictors, including soil properties (sand, silt, and clay percentages), slope, spectral bands (red, green, blue, red-edge, NIR), vegetation indices (GNDRE, NDRE, TGI), color-space indices, and wavelengths were derived from the multispectral data collected at the seven (V4, V5, V6, V7, V9, V12, and V14/VT) growth stages of corn. Four regression and machine learning algorithms were evaluated for yield prediction: linear regression, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and gradient boosting regressor. A total of 6865 yield values were used for model training and 1716 for validation. Results show that, using random forest method, the V14/VT stage had the best yield predictions (RMSE of 0.52 Mg/ha for a mean yield of 10.19 Mg/ha), and yield estimation at V6 stage was still feasible. We concluded that integrating abiotic factors, such as slope and soil properties, significantly improved model accuracy. Among vegetation indices, TGI, HUE, and GNDRE performed better. Results from this study can help farmers or crop consultants plan ahead for future logistics through enhanced early-season yield predictions and support farm profitability and sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning-based corrosion rate prediction of steel embedded in soil
    Dong, Zheng
    Ding, Ling
    Meng, Zhou
    Xu, Ke
    Mao, Yongqi
    Chen, Xiangxiang
    Ye, Hailong
    Poursaee, Amir
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [42] Vegetation Masking of Remote Sensing Data Aids Machine Learning for Soil Fertility Prediction
    Winzeler, Hans Edwin
    Mancini, Marcelo
    Blackstock, Joshua M.
    Libohova, Zamir
    Owens, Phillip R.
    Ashworth, Amanda J.
    Miller, David M.
    Silva, Sergio H. G.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [43] Simultaneous corn and soybean yield prediction from remote sensing data using deep transfer learning
    Khaki, Saeed
    Pham, Hieu
    Wang, Lizhi
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [44] Simultaneous corn and soybean yield prediction from remote sensing data using deep transfer learning
    Saeed Khaki
    Hieu Pham
    Lizhi Wang
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [45] Soil and satellite remote sensing variables importance using machine learning to predict cotton yield
    Carneiro, Franciele Morlin
    de Brito Filho, Armando Lopes
    Ferreira, Francielle Morelli
    Seben Junior, Getulio de Freitas
    Brandao, Ziany Neiva
    da Silva, Rouverson Pereira
    Shiratsuchi, Luciano Shozo
    SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 5
  • [46] Yield prediction in a peanut breeding program using remote sensing data and machine learning algorithms
    Pugh, N. Ace
    Young, Andrew
    Ojha, Manisha
    Emendack, Yves
    Sanchez, Jacobo
    Xin, Zhanguo
    Puppala, Naveen
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
  • [47] Tree crop yield estimation and prediction using remote sensing and machine learning: A systematic review
    Trentin, Carolina
    Ampatzidis, Yiannis
    Lacerda, Christian
    Shiratsuchi, Luciano
    SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 9
  • [48] Research on Impact Prediction Model for Corn Ears by Integrating Motion Features Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Fan, Chenlong
    Wang, Wenjin
    Cui, Tao
    Liu, Ying
    Qiao, Mengmeng
    PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [49] Hybridization of process-based models, remote sensing, and machine learning for enhanced spatial predictions of wheat yield and quality
    Kheir, Ahmed M. S.
    Govind, Ajit
    Nangia, Vinay
    El-Maghraby, Maher A.
    Elnashar, Abdelrazek
    Ahmed, Mukhtar
    Aboelsoud, Hesham
    Gamal, Rania
    Feike, Til
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2025, 234
  • [50] Preliminary Results in Innovative Solutions for Soil Carbon Estimation: Integrating Remote Sensing, Machine Learning, and Proximal Sensing Spectroscopy
    Li, Tong
    Xia, Anquan
    Mclaren, Timothy I.
    Pandey, Rajiv
    Xu, Zhihong
    Liu, Hongdou
    Manning, Sean
    Madgett, Oli
    Duncan, Sam
    Rasmussen, Peter
    Ruhnke, Florian
    Yuezueguellue, Onur
    Fajraoui, Noura
    Beniwal, Deeksha
    Chapman, Scott
    Tsiminis, Georgios
    Smith, Chaya
    Dalal, Ram C.
    Dang, Yash P.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (23)