Sustainable Equity Index Dynamic: Connectedness and Information Asymmetry in Emerging Markets

被引:0
|
作者
Bhue, Rajesh [1 ]
Gartia, Umakanta [1 ]
Panda, Ajaya Kumar [1 ]
Nanda, Swagatika [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management, Mumbai, India
[2] Vidyalankar Sch Informat Technol, Mumbai, India
来源
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND DEVELOPMENT | 2025年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
asymmetric volatility; dynamic connectedness; equity index; leverage effect; sustainability; TVP-VAR; ESG; TIME; SPILLOVERS; GOVERNANCE; ATTENTION; VARIANCE; IMPACT; RETURN; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/bsd2.70072
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of the study is to investigate the evidence of information asymmetry, dynamic connectedness, and volatility spillover among ESG equity indices of emerging market economies. Using Sign bias test and GARCH family models, the study finds that ESG equity indices have a leverage effect, significantly impacted by bad news over good news shock. The study has used FIGARCH model to measure the persistence of long-memory effects across the emerging market. Further, to ensure the interconnection between ESG equity indices that may arise due to the persistence of long-memory effects, the stusy has examined estimates of TVP-VAR, and finds moderate interconnection between ESG equity indices. To be specific, ESG equity indices of the Philippines, Indonesia, Korea, Singapore, and India are more sensitive to receiving any sustainable innovation shocks from Brazil, South Africa, and Mexican ESG indices. The study finds significant bidirectional relationships between the ESG equity indices of "Philippines and Brazil," "Indonesia and India," and "South Africa and Mexico" that may lead to the spreading of market contagion in the presence of more substantial leverage effects with a long memory. This research offers insights for investors to consider sustainable equity assets for efficient portfolio diversification, mitigating environmental, social, and governance risks associated with volatility spillovers and dynamic connectedness. Policymakers may refer the findings of the study to design effective ESG regulations, for reducing risk in global financial system. Since the pandemic has produced more economic and financial instability in emerging markets, investors and regulators may pay more attention to return and volatility connectivity among ESG equity indices and financial markets to safeguard investment and restore market stability.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] INFORMATION ASYMMETRY AND EQUITY ISSUES
    DIERKENS, N
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1991, 26 (02) : 181 - 199
  • [22] Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets
    Ji, Qiang
    Bouri, Elie
    Lau, Chi Keung Marco
    Roubaud, David
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 63 : 257 - 272
  • [23] Information asymmetry and the effect of financial openness on firm growth and wage in emerging markets
    Park, Haehean
    Lee, Po-sang
    Park, Yun W.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2020, 69 : 901 - 916
  • [24] Calculating the cost of equity in emerging markets
    Von Jenner, Mark
    JASSA-THE FINSIA JOURNAL OF APPLIED FINANCE, 2008, (04): : 21 - 25
  • [25] Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets
    Bekaert, G
    Harvey, CR
    JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (02): : 565 - 613
  • [26] Uncovered equity "disparity" in emerging markets
    Fuertes, Ana-Maria
    Phylaktis, Kate
    Yan, Cheng
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2019, 98
  • [27] Predicting Equity Returns in Emerging Markets
    Atilgan, Yigit
    Demirtas, K. Ozgur
    Gunaydin, A. Doruk
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (13) : 3721 - 3738
  • [28] THE RISK EXPOSURE OF EMERGING EQUITY MARKETS
    HARVEY, CR
    WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1995, 9 (01): : 19 - 50
  • [29] Emerging equity markets in a globalized world
    Bekaert, Geert
    Harvey, Campbell R.
    Mondino, Tomas
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2023, 56
  • [30] Emerging equity markets and economic development
    Bekaert, G
    Harvey, CR
    Lundblad, C
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2001, 66 (02) : 465 - 504