Early detection and a treatment bundle strategy for postpartum haemorrhage: a mixed-methods process evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Bohren, Meghan A. [1 ]
Miller, Suellen [2 ]
Mammoliti, Kristie-Marie [3 ]
Galadanci, Hadiza [4 ]
Fawcus, Sue [5 ]
Moran, Neil [6 ,7 ]
Hofmeyr, G. Justus [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Qureshi, Zahida [11 ]
Al-Beity, Fadhlun Alwy [12 ]
Forbes, Gillian [13 ]
Akter, Shahinoor [14 ]
Osoti, Alfred [11 ]
Gwako, George [11 ]
Santos, Thiago Melo [1 ]
Evans, Cherrie [15 ,16 ]
Wakili, Aminu Ado [4 ]
Bakari, Maisaratu [4 ]
Takai, Idris Usman [17 ]
Umar, Mohammad [18 ]
Singata-Madliki, Mandisa [8 ,9 ]
Muller, Elani [19 ]
Mandondo, Sibongile [19 ]
Okore, Jenipher [11 ]
Banda, Akwinata [12 ]
Sambusa, Masumbuko [12 ]
Sindhu, Kulandaipalayam N. [3 ]
Beeson, Leanne [3 ]
Easter, Christina Louise [20 ]
Devall, Adam [3 ]
Guelmezoglu, A. Metin [21 ]
Althabe, Fernando [22 ]
Oladapo, Olufemi [22 ]
Gallos, Ioannis [22 ]
Coomarasamy, Arri [3 ]
Lorencatto, Fabiana [13 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Nossal Inst Global Hlth, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Gender & Womens Hlth Unit, Melbourne, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] UNIV BIRMINGHAM, Coll Med & Hlth, BIRMINGHAM, England
[4] Bayero Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, African Ctr Excellence Populat Hlth & Policy, Kano, Nigeria
[5] Univ Cape Town, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Cape Town, South Africa
[6] KwaZulu Natal Dept Hlth, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[7] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Nelson Mandela Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Durban, South Africa
[8] Univ Witwatersrand, Effect Care Res Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa
[9] Walter Sisulu Univ, East London, South Africa
[10] Univ Botswana, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Gaborone, Botswana
[11] Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Universityof Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
[12] Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Muhimbili Universityof Hlth & Allied Sci, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[13] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, London, England
[14] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Rural Hlth Sch, John Richards Ctr Rural Ageing Res, Wodonga, Vic, Australia
[15] Jhpiego, Maternal & Newborn Hlth Unit, Tech Leadership & Innovat, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[16] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
[17] Bayero Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Fac Clin Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Kano, Nigeria
[18] Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Katsina, Nigeria
[19] Effect Care Res Unit, East London, South Africa
[20] Univ Birmingham, Inst Appl Hlth Res, Birmingham, England
[21] Concept Fdn, Geneva, Switzerland
[22] WHO, Dept Sexual & Reprod Hlth & Res, UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WHO World Bank Special Programme, Geneva, Switzerland
来源
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH | 2025年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00454-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Postpartum haemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal mortality. A multicountry, cluster-randomised trial (E-MOTIVE) demonstrated a 60% reduction in adverse postpartum haemorrhage outcomes. The E-MOTIVE intervention included early postpartum haemorrhage detection using calibrated blood-collection drapes, followed by a postpartum haemorrhage treatment bundle (ie, uterine massage, oxytocics, tranexamic acid, intravenous fluids, examination and escalation [MOTIVE]), supported by implementation strategies. We report a mixed-methods process evaluation assessing the implementation of the E-MOTIVE intervention in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and Tanzania. Methods In this mixed-methods process evaluation, data sources were observations of health workers providing clinical care to pregnant women and pregnant people during vaginal birth and postpartum haemorrhage at intervention sites, and surveys and qualitative interviews with health workers at intervention and control sites. Intervention sites received the calibrated drapes, MOTIVE bundle, and implementation strategies and control sites used uncalibrated drapes. Primary implementation outcomes included fidelity, adoption, adaptation, acceptability, feasibility, and contamination to the calibrated drape, MOTIVE bundle, and implementation strategies. Findings Between June 1, 2022, and Jan 31, 2023, 2578 births were observed, 295 pregnant women and people had postpartum haemorrhage, 47 qualitative interviews were done, and 889 surveys were completed. Fidelity to calibrated drape use was high (birth observations 2578 [100%] of 2578; survey 451 [98<middle dot>3%] of 459). Among health workers, calibrated drape acceptability was high; however, they reported barriers to pregnant women's and people's acceptability. Fidelity to postpartum haemorrhage treatment bundle delivery was high (birth observations 286 [96<middle dot>9%] of 295), with moderate to high fidelity in median time from postpartum haemorrhage diagnosis to final treatment initiation (<= 15 min initiation time in 191 [66<middle dot>8%] of 295 birth observations, 16-20 min in 42 [14<middle dot>7%] birth observations), and high acceptability and feasibility. Research midwives participated in clinical assessments after birth and bundle delivery in some sites (mixed fidelity). Interpretation This process evaluation shows generally high levels of fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability of the calibrated drape and treatment bundle across evaluation methods and countries. The E-MOTIVE intervention should be included in national policies, with consideration for health workforce, supplies, and medication issues, which might need addressing for successful implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:e329 / e344
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Barriers to Completing the Transplant Evaluation Process: A Mixed-Methods Study.
    Gordon, E. J.
    Uriarte, J. J.
    McLagan, A. N.
    Kuramitsu, B.
    Gacki-Smith, J.
    Shumate, M.
    McElroy, L.
    Caicedo, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 1046 - 1046
  • [12] MIXED-METHODS PROCESS EVALUATION OF A RESPIRATORY CULTURE DIAGNOSTIC STEWARDSHIP INTERVENTION
    Chiotos, Kathleen
    Whittaker, Jennifer
    Marshall, Deanna
    Kellom, Katherine
    Woods-Hill, Charlotte
    Lee, Giyoung
    Sydney, Guy
    Wolfe, Heather
    Stinson, Hannah
    Blumenthal, Jennifer
    McGowan, Nancy
    Piccione, Joseph
    Gerber, Jeffrey
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01) : 350 - 350
  • [13] A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation of the Art of Yoga Project for Girls in Custody
    Middleton, Lisa
    Harris, Danielle Arlanda
    Ackerman, Alissa R.
    PRISON JOURNAL, 2019, 99 : 38S - 60S
  • [14] A mixed-methods process evaluation of a goal management intervention for patients with polyarthritis
    Arends, Roos Y.
    Bode, Christina
    Taal, Erik
    Van de Laar, Mart A. F. J.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2017, 31 (01) : 38 - 60
  • [15] Failure to rescue in postpartum haemorrhage: a mixed-methods study to determining why mainstream, evidence-based treatments fail
    Bulamba, Fred
    Hewitt-Smith, Adam
    Stephens, Timothy
    Uddin, Ruzena
    Patel, Akshay
    Pearse, Rupert
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2021, 133 (3S_SUPPL): : 1038 - 1038
  • [16] Implementation of the VA Intensive Dysphagia Treatment Program: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
    Yee, Joanne
    Pulia, Michael
    Knobloch, Mary Jo
    Martinez, Rachael
    Daggett, Sarah
    Smith, Bridget
    Musson, Nan
    Rogus-Pulia, Nicole
    HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2022, 15
  • [17] A mixed-methods process evaluation of Family Navigation implementation for autism spectrum disorder
    Broder-Fingert, Sarabeth
    Qin, Sarah
    Goupil, Julia
    Rosenberg, Jessica
    Augustyn, Marilyn
    Blum, Nate
    Bennett, Amanda
    Weitzman, Carol
    Guevara, James P.
    Fenick, Ada
    Silverstein, Michael
    Feinberg, Emily
    AUTISM, 2019, 23 (05) : 1288 - 1299
  • [18] Mixed-methods process evaluation of a respiratory-culture diagnostic stewardship intervention
    Chiotos, Kathleen
    Marshall, Deanna
    Kellom, Katherine
    Whittaker, Jennifer
    Wolfe, Heather
    Woods-Hill, Charlotte
    Stinson, Hannah
    Keim, Garrett
    Blumenthal, Jennifer
    Piccione, Joseph
    Lee, Giyoung
    Sydney, Guy
    Gerber, Jeffrey
    INFECTION CONTROL & HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 44 (02) : 191 - 199
  • [19] Increasing Older Adult Involvement in Geriatric Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
    Rietkerk, Wanda
    de Jonge-de Haan, Jannet
    Slaets, Joris P. J.
    Zuidema, Sytse U.
    Gerritsen, Debby L.
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2021, 33 (7-8) : 482 - 492
  • [20] 'Birthing a Better Future': A mixed-methods evaluation of an exhibition on the early years of life
    Lakhanpaul, Maya
    Alexander, Emma C.
    Cupp, Meghan A.
    Owugha, Jessica Taripre
    Florschutz, Alex
    Beckingham, Andy
    Kisan, Virad
    Lakhanpaul, Monica
    Manikam, Logan
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (04) : 1270 - 1285