Residual ciprofloxacin in chicken manure inhibits methane production in an anaerobic digestion system

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, Yiting [1 ]
Liu, Qing [1 ]
Ran, Hongli [1 ]
Peng, Pingcai [1 ]
Wang, Yan [1 ]
Peng, Guoliang [2 ]
Wu, Yinbao [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Wen, Xin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Shaoguan Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Utilizat & Conservat Food &, Shaoguan 512005, Peoples R China
[3] South China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci, State Key Lab Swine & Poultry Breeding Ind, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[4] South China Agr Univ, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Agroanim Genom & Mol Breed, Key Lab Chicken Genet Breeding & Reprod, Minist Agr, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Laying hen manure; Ciprofloxacin; Anaerobic digestion; Methane; Veterinary antibiotic; ACETOCLASTIC METHANOGENESIS; CO-DIGESTION; ANTIBIOTICS; WASTE; ENHANCEMENT; INSIGHT; SOIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.psj.2024.104539
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion (AD) is commonly used to dispose of laying hen manure. However, veterinary antibiotic residues present in chicken manure may affect the AD process. Here, the effects of three types of veterinary antibiotics commonly used in laying hen breeding on AD were explored. Manures containing antibiotics at two different concentrations were continuously added during AD for 5 days: amoxicillin (H-AMX: 145.06 mg/kg, L-AMX: 57.88 mg/kg), doxycycline (H-DOC: 183.61 mg/kg, L-DOC: 98.00 mg/kg), and ciprofloxacin (H-CIP: 96.34 mg/kg, L-CIP: 40.43 mg/kg). Compared with a control with no veterinary antibiotics, the amoxicillin and doxycycline groups presented no significant effects on biogas production, methane production, VFA concentration, acetic acid concentration or the pH of the AD system (P > 0.05). However, compared with the control, the ciprofloxacin groups presented significantly inhibited biogas and methane production during AD (P < 0.05), and the H-CIP and L-CIP groups presented significantly decreased biogas (47.82% and 45.37%, respectively) and methane (58.24% and 52.55%, respectively) production (P < 0.05). Moreover, the VFA and acetic acid concentrations of the ciprofloxacin groups were significantly higher than those of control during the entire AD period (P < 0.05), and the pH value at the withdrawal stage was significantly lower than that of the control group (P < 0.01), with no significant difference between the H-CIP and L-CIP groups (P > 0.05). Our results suggest that ciprofloxacin causes VFA and acetic acid accumulation in AD systems, thereby reducing the pH of the systems and inhibiting methanogen growth, ultimately reducing methane production in the AD systems. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the impact of ciprofloxacin on methane production in AD systems and offer some considerations for the application of AD systems.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] METHANE GAS-PRODUCTION FROM ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION OF CATTLE MANURE
    QASIM, SR
    WARREN, K
    UDOMSINROT, K
    ENERGY SOURCES, 1984, 7 (04): : 319 - 341
  • [22] Anaerobic Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste and Cattle Manure for Methane Production
    Li, R.
    Chen, S.
    Li, X.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2009, 31 (20) : 1848 - 1856
  • [23] Temperature and pH Effect on Methane Production from Buffalo Manure Anaerobic Digestion
    Carotenuto, Claudia
    Guarino, Giovanna
    Morrone, Biagio
    Minale, Mario
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 34 : S425 - S429
  • [24] Study of Methane Production by High Temperature Anaerobic Fermentation of Chicken Manure and Stalks
    Li, Yongku
    Hu, Xiaomin
    Feng, Lei
    JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY, 2020, 14 (04) : 551 - 557
  • [25] Methane production and microbial community characteristics of anaerobic codigestion of straws and chicken manure
    Feng, Lei
    Song, Jianan
    Zhen, Xiaofei
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 114 (04) : 2113 - 2122
  • [26] Anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and cardboard waste: Focusing on methane production, microbial community analysis and energy evaluation
    Zhao, Shunan
    Chen, Wenhan
    Luo, Wendan
    Fang, Hongli
    Lv, Huanyu
    Liu, Rutao
    Niu, Qigui
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 321
  • [27] Evaluating Methane Production from Anaerobic Mono- and Co-digestion of Kitchen Waste, Corn Stover, and Chicken Manure
    Li, Yeqing
    Zhang, Ruihong
    Liu, Xiaoying
    Chen, Chang
    Xiao, Xiao
    Feng, Lu
    He, Yanfeng
    Liu, Guangqing
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2013, 27 (04) : 2085 - 2091
  • [28] Anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure and barley: Effect of cow manure to barley ratio on methane production and digestion stability
    Akyol, Cagri
    Ozbayram, Emine Gozde
    Ince, Orhan
    Kleinsteuber, Sabine
    Ince, Bahar
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 35 (02) : 589 - 595
  • [29] Biosolids-Derived Biochar Improves Biomethane Production in the Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure
    Hassan, Soulayma
    Ngo, Tien
    Khudur, Leadin S.
    Krohn, Christian
    Dike, Charles Chinyere
    Hakeem, Ibrahim Gbolahan
    Shah, Kalpit
    Surapaneni, Aravind
    Ball, Andrew S.
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2023, 12 (10):
  • [30] Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cattle Manure and Brewer's Residual Yeast: Process Stability and Methane and Hydrogen Sulfide Production
    Akamine, Luana Alves
    Passini, Roberta
    Sousa, Joao Antonio Silva
    Fernandes, Aline
    de Moraes, Maria Joselma
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2023, 9 (12):