Toward sustainable practices in photovoltaic and agricultural greenhouse systems: An ecosystem services framework

被引:0
|
作者
Steren, Aviv [1 ,4 ]
Slater, Yehuda [1 ]
Rubin, Ofir D. [2 ,3 ]
Fleischer, Aliza [1 ]
Kan, Iddo [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Robert H Smith Fac Agr Food & Environm, Dept Environm Econ & Management, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Guilford Glazer Fac Business & Management, Dept Publ Policy & Management, POB 653, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Goldman Sonnenfeldt Sch Sustainabil & Climate Chan, Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Elect Vehicle Res Ctr, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Photovoltaic and agricultural greenhouse; systems; Vegetative agricultural land use economics; model; Ecosystem services; Sustainable farming practices; LAND-USE; ECONOMIC VALUATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LANDSCAPE; MODELS; IMPACT; ELASTICITIES; PREFERENCES; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108364
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Policies promoting agrivoltaics face the challenge of balancing between mitigating climate change and farmland preservation. This study applies an ecosystem-services (ESS) approach to evaluate the introduction of transparent solar panels (TSP) as photovoltaic and agricultural greenhouse systems (PVGs) with low impact on agricultural activities. Using a partial equilibrium model of Israel's vegetative agriculture, we simulate the introduction of TSP on farmers' optimal land allocation between open-field and covered crops and its sustainability. The model accounts for food and energy production as provisioning vegetative-agriculture ESS (VAESS), and for greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions and open-field landscape as non-provisioning VAESS. Our findings suggest that TSP represents an economically viable and sustainable PVG technology. The adoption of TSP, alongside policies that internalize the value of non-provisioning ESS, is projected to convert 1.3 % of Israel's cultivable land from open fields to covered crops, contributing approximately 7 % to the nation's electricity supply. The estimated annual increase in VAESS per hectare is valued at $864, comprising $812 from electricity generation, $259 from GHG emission reductions, $277 in consumer surplus from agricultural products, offset by a $441 reduction in agricultural output, and a $43 decrease in landscape value. Our analysis demonstrates how an ecosystem services framework can guide policy decisions toward optimal land-use allocation in agrivoltaic systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A conceptual framework for the governance of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Aude Vialatte
    Cecile Barnaud
    Julien Blanco
    Annie Ouin
    Jean-Philippe Choisis
    Emilie Andrieu
    David Sheeren
    Sylvie Ladet
    Marc Deconchat
    Floriane Clément
    Diane Esquerré
    Clelia Sirami
    Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1653 - 1673
  • [22] Pollination ecosystem services in South African agricultural systems
    Melin, Annalie
    Rouget, Mathieu
    Midgley, Jeremy J.
    Donaldson, John S.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2014, 110 (11-12)
  • [23] Ecosystem services and biodiversity of agricultural systems at the landscape scale
    Sonoko D. Bellingrath-Kimura
    Benjamin Burkhard
    Brendan Fisher
    Bettina Matzdorf
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193
  • [24] Ecosystem services and biodiversity of agricultural systems at the landscape scale
    Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko D.
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Fisher, Brendan
    Matzdorf, Bettina
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (SUPPL 1)
  • [25] LivestockPlus - The sustainable intensification of forage-based agricultural systems to improve livelihoods and ecosystem services in the tropics
    Rao, I.
    Peters, M.
    Castro, A.
    Schultze-Kraft, R.
    White, D.
    Fisher, M.
    Miles, J.
    Lascano, C.
    Bluemmel, M.
    Bungenstab, D.
    Tapasco, J.
    Hyman, G.
    Bolliger, A.
    Paul, B.
    Van der Hoek, R.
    Maass, B.
    Tiemann, T.
    Cuchillo, M.
    Douxchamps, S.
    Villanueva, C.
    Rincon, A.
    Ayarza, M.
    Rosenstock, T.
    Subbarao, G.
    Arango, J.
    Cardoso, J.
    Worthington, M.
    Chirinda, N.
    Notenbaert, A.
    Jenet, A.
    Schmidt, A.
    Vivas, N.
    Lefroy, R.
    Fahrney, K.
    Guimaraes, E.
    Tohme, J.
    Cook, S.
    Herrero, M.
    Chacon, M.
    Searchinger, T.
    Rudel, T.
    TROPICAL GRASSLANDS-FORRAJES TROPICALES, 2015, 3 (02): : 59 - 82
  • [26] Towards a framework for driving sustainable urban regeneration with ecosystem services
    Lak, Azadeh
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    Khazaei, Mohsen
    Aghamolaei, Reihaneh
    LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111
  • [27] Sustainable Ecosystem Services Framework for Tropical Catchment Management: A Review
    Zafirah, N.
    Nurin, N. A.
    Samsurijan, M. S.
    Zuknik, M. H.
    Rafatullah, M.
    Syakir, M. I.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (04)
  • [28] Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices
    Kragt, Marit E.
    Robertson, Michael J.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 102 : 147 - 157
  • [29] Ecosystem management of ecosystem services and invasive species toward sustainable utilization of fishery resources
    Hori, Masakazu
    Hamaguchi, Masami
    Iwasaki, Keiji
    Sato-Okoshi, Waka
    NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 2007, 73 (06) : 1155 - 1159
  • [30] An innovative approach to combine solar photovoltaic gardens with agricultural production and ecosystem services
    Semeraro, Teodoro
    Scarano, Aurelia
    Santino, Angelo
    Emmanuel, Rohinton
    Lenucci, Marcello
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 56