Impact of the tumor microenvironment on delivery of nanomedicine in tumors treated with ultrasound and microbubbles

被引:0
|
作者
Einen, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Snipstad, Sofie [2 ,3 ]
Nordlund, Veronica [2 ]
Devold, Ella J. [2 ]
Amini, Naseh [4 ]
Hansen, Rune [5 ,6 ]
Sulheim, Einar [2 ,7 ]
Davies, Catharina de Lange [2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, PoreLab, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Phys, Trondheim, Norway
[3] St Olavs Hosp, Canc Clin, Trondheim, Norway
[4] SURF Technol AS, Trondheim, Norway
[5] SINTEF Digital, Dept Hlth Res, Trondheim, Norway
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Circulat & Med Imaging, Trondheim, Norway
[7] Inst Res Biomed, Bellinzona, Switzerland
关键词
Sonopermeation; Ultrasound; Microbubbles; Nanoparticle delivery; Perfusion; Stiffness; Extracellular matrix; NANOPARTICLE-STABILIZED MICROBUBBLES; MEDIATED DELIVERY; CANCER; PERMEABILITY; PRESSURE; PENETRATION; TRANSPORT; BARRIERS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.12.037
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The delivery of nanoparticles to tumors has been shown preclinically to be improved by microbubble-mediated ultrasound. However, the mechanisms and biological effects are not fully understood. In this study, we explored the influence of the tumor microenvironment on nanoparticle uptake and microdistribution both with and without ultrasound and microbubble treatment. Three murine tumor models, KPC (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma), 4T1 (triple negative mammary carcinoma) and CT26 (colon carcinoma), were characterized with respect to extracellular matrix composition, tumor stiffness and perfusion. KPC and 4T1 tumors presented higher levels of collagen and hyaluronic acid and were stiffer compared to CT26, whereas all three tumors had similar levels of sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Furthermore, the 4T1 tumors appeared poorly vascularized with a lower cell density compared to KPC and CT26. All three tumors presented similar nanoparticle uptake, but extravasated nanoparticles traveled significantly shorter in KPC tumors compared to 4T1 and CT26. The effect of ultrasound and microbubble treatment on the tumor uptake and penetration of polymer nanoparticles into the extracellular matrix were evaluated using a treatment protocol previously shown to increase nanoparticle delivery to tumors. Interestingly, we found a significant increase in nanoparticle uptake in the soft CT26 tumor, but no effect of the ultrasound treatment in the stiff KPC and 4T1 tumors, suggesting that tumor stiffness is an important parameter for treatment with ultrasound and microbubbles. Ultrasound treatment resulted in a modest but not statistically significant improvement in nanoparticle penetration through the extracellular matrix. In tumors demonstrating increased uptake of nanoparticles following ultrasound treatment, the uptake correlated positively with blood volume. These findings emphasize the importance of taking the tumor microenvironment into consideration when optimizing ultrasound parameters for delivery of nanomedicine.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 670
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nanomedicine for tumor microenvironment modulation and cancer treatment enhancement
    Liu, Jingjing
    Chen, Qian
    Feng, Liangzhu
    Liu, Zhuang
    NANO TODAY, 2018, 21 : 55 - 73
  • [32] Stromal barriers to nanomedicine penetration in the pancreatic tumor microenvironment
    Tanaka, Hiroyoshi Y.
    Kano, Mitsunobu R.
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2018, 109 (07): : 2085 - 2092
  • [33] Optimization of the tumor microenvironment and nanomedicine properties simultaneously to improve tumor therapy
    Zhang, Bo
    Shi, Wei
    Jiang, Ting
    Wang, Lanting
    Mei, Heng
    Lu, Heng
    Hu, Yu
    Pang, Zhiqing
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (38) : 62607 - 62618
  • [34] Normalization of Tumor Vasculature by Oxygen Microbubbles with Ultrasound
    Ho, Yi-Ju
    Chu, Shu-Wei
    Liao, En-Chi
    Fan, Ching-Hsiang
    Chan, Hong-Lin
    Wei, Kuo-Chen
    Yeh, Chih-Kuang
    THERANOSTICS, 2019, 9 (24): : 7370 - 7383
  • [35] Microneedle-Based Generation of Microbubbles in Cancer Tumors to Improve Ultrasound-Assisted Drug Delivery
    Zandi, Ashkan
    Khayamian, Mohammad Ali
    Saghafi, Mohammad
    Shalileh, Shahriar
    Katebi, Pouyan
    Assadi, Sepanta
    Gilani, Ali
    Parizi, Mohammad Salemizadeh
    Vanaei, Shohreh
    Esmailinejad, Mohammad Reza
    Abbasvandi, Fereshteh
    Hoseinpour, Parisa
    Abdolahad, Mohammad
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2019, 8 (17)
  • [36] Sonoprinting liposomes on tumor spheroids by microbubbles and ultrasound
    Roovers, S.
    Deprez, J.
    Priwitaningrum, D.
    Lajoinie, G.
    Rivron, N.
    Declercq, H.
    De Wever, O.
    Stride, E.
    Le Gac, S.
    Versluis, M.
    Prakash, J.
    De Smedt, S. C.
    Lentacker, I.
    JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2019, 316 : 79 - 92
  • [37] Optimal treatment occasion for ultrasound stimulated microbubbles in promoting gemcitabine delivery to VX2 tumors
    Luo, Tingting
    Bai, Luhua
    Zhang, Yi
    Huang, Leidan
    Li, Hui
    Gao, Shunji
    Dong, Xiaoxiao
    Li, Ningshan
    Liu, Zheng
    DRUG DELIVERY, 2022, 29 (01) : 2796 - 2804
  • [38] Drug delivery to solid tumors: the predictive value of the multicellular tumor spheroid model for nanomedicine screening
    Millard, Marie
    Yakavets, Ilya
    Zorin, Vladimir
    Kulmukhamedova, Aigul
    Marchal, Sophie
    Bezdetnaya, Lina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE, 2017, 12 : 7993 - 8007
  • [39] Imaging tumor microenvironment with ultrasound
    Sridhar, M
    Insana, MF
    INFORMATION PROCESSING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3565 : 516 - 528
  • [40] Intravascular Ultrasound Detection and Delivery of Molecularly Targeted Microbubbles for Gene Delivery
    Phillips, Linsey C.
    Klibanov, Alexander L.
    Wamhoff, Brian R.
    Hossack, John A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2012, 59 (07) : 1596 - 1601