Employer insights into key competencies for human resource management graduates: a Q-methodology study

被引:0
|
作者
Bogdany, Eszter [1 ]
Cserhati, Gabriella [1 ]
Csizmadia, Tibor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pannonia, Dept Management, Veszprem, Hungary
来源
COGENT EDUCATION | 2025年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
HRM graduates' competencies; diverse perspectives; Q methodology; higher education alignment; competency expectations; Business; Management and Accounting; Study Skills; Continuing Professional Development; Higher Education; SKILLS; EDUCATION; HRM;
D O I
10.1080/2331186X.2024.2448885
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study aims to investigate the subjective views of HRM professionals regarding the competencies essential for HRM graduates, focusing on identifying distinct competency preference groups, understanding their perceived importance and prioritization of competencies, and delineating unique attributes that differentiate these views. A total of 118 HR professionals were involved in the study, and Q-methodology was used to identify different viewpoints and distinguished statements. The identified five distinct competency preference groups among HR professionals, revealing variations in the importance placed on competencies such as traditional HR knowledge and practical skills, soft skills tailored for organizational fit, digital proficiency and technical skills, legal expertise, and capabilities essential for future HR professionals. The results offer interesting insights that contribute to the literature on workplace competencies. This study breaks new ground in HRM education by revealing diverse competency preferences among HR professionals, guiding higher education institutions (HEIs) to enhance curriculum flexibility and relevance.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Public frames in the road pricing debate: A Q-methodology study
    Krabbenborg, Lizet
    Molin, Eric
    Annema, Jan Anne
    van Wee, Bert
    TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 93 : 46 - 53
  • [32] Views of older people in the Netherlands on wellbeing: A Q-methodology study
    Hackert, Mariska Q. N.
    Brouwer, Werner B. F.
    Hoefman, Renske J.
    van Exel, Job
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 240
  • [33] Opinions of Adolescents on Prevention Related to Sexting: a Q-Methodology Study
    Yara Barrense-Dias
    Christina Akre
    Joan-Carles Suris
    André Berchtold
    Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 2020, 17 : 753 - 764
  • [34] Health Beliefs of Nurses in Northern Thailand: A Q-Methodology Study
    Guptarak, Marisa
    Conway, Jane
    Stone, Teresa Elizabeth
    Fongkaew, Warunee
    Settheekul, Saowaluck
    Baxter, Emily
    JOURNAL OF TRANSCULTURAL NURSING, 2020, 31 (04) : 350 - 359
  • [35] BRAZILIAN COMMUNIST OPINION - A Q-METHODOLOGY STUDY OF 10 PARTIES
    PERITORE, NP
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPING AREAS, 1988, 23 (01): : 105 - 135
  • [36] Q-methodology in nursing research - A promising method for the study of subjectivity
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    Baumann, Andrea
    Cordingley, Lis
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 30 (06) : 759 - 773
  • [37] A Q-Methodology of Preservice Teachers' Cognition of Digital Literacy: A Philippine Case Study in Resource-Rich and Resource-Limited Contexts
    Vizconde, Camilla J.
    Tomas, Rowena R. Sto
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF TEACHER EDUCATION, 2023, 48 (02): : 89 - 103
  • [38] Trauma-informed care: Insights from a Q-methodology study of advanced practice registered nursing students
    Tornwall, Joni
    Holod, Alicia F.
    Teall, Alice M.
    Overcash, Janine
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 133
  • [39] Learning from farmers' knowledge on participatory irrigation management using Q-methodology
    Kimbowa, George
    Wanyama, Joshua
    Mukaya, Muhmoud
    Otim, Daniel
    Awio, Thomas
    Mugisha, Moses
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2025, 74 (01) : 342 - 361
  • [40] Considering sustainability in project management decision making; An investigation using Q-methodology
    Silvius, A. J. Gilbert
    Kampinga, Martin
    Paniagua, Silvana
    Mooi, Herman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (06) : 1133 - 1150