Yield and Quality of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars from Successive Harvests in Spring and Fall Production Seasons in Oklahoma

被引:0
|
作者
Richmond, Jess [1 ]
Maness, Niels [1 ]
Goad, Carla [2 ]
Brandenberger, Lynn [1 ]
Mason, Tyler [1 ]
Kathi, Shivani [1 ]
Chrz, Donna [1 ]
Hu, Bizhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Hort & Landscape Architecture, 320G Agr Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Stat, 301F Math Sci Bldg, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
fructose; glucose; multiple harvest; planting season; sucrose; sugar; POLLEN GERMINATION; SEED SET; TEMPERATURE; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; SUCROSE; ACCUMULATION; COMPONENTS; SWEETNESS;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI18146-24
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Numerous studies have evaluated snap bean pod yield and quality at different pod maturities, but only a few have evaluated yield and pod quality across different seasons within the same year or for pods harvested at the same relative maturity cessively from the same plants. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine if bean yield or pod sugar accumulation differed for pods at the same relative stage maturity from plants harvested multiple times in spring and fall planting seasons north central Oklahoma. Nine snap bean cultivars (seven green-podded and two low-podded) were fi eld-grown in Spring and Fall 2022 and 2023. Pods were harvested weekly for 3 weeks from the same plants and at the same relative pod development stage. Pod yield and sugar concentration were measured. The total pod yield pooled across seasons and years of ' Sybaris ' was lower (approximately 4100 kg ha- 1 ) that of six of the other cultivars, which yielded between 7000 to 8600 kg ha- 1 . In spring, pod yield increased from 900 to 1300 kg ha- 1 in the fi rst harvest to 3500 to 3700 kg ha by the last harvest. In Fall 2022, the yield decreased from 1900 kg ha- 1 in the fi rst harvest to 690 kgha-1 by the last harvest, whereas in Fall 2023 the pod yield remained steady at 2600 to 3000 kgha-1 at each weekly harvest. The Fall 2022 decrease in yield was likely caused by low temperatures during pod development and a freeze that shortened the harvest season. From the fi rst to the last harvest, the total pod sugar concentration decreased from 145.5 to 107.2 mg g-1, glucose decreased from 48.4 to 33.0 mg and fructose decreased from 90.7 to 52.0 mgg-1. However, the sucrose concentration creased from 9.2 to 21.9 mgg-1. This decrease in the total and monomeric sugar centrations, coupled with a disproportionally smaller increase in sucrose, is typical overly mature snap bean pods, which are considered less desirable because of lower sweetness. Snap bean pods harvested later in the growing season in a successive harvest system at the same relative stage of maturity as earlier harvested pods had sugar centrations resembling those of overly mature pods, indicating that snap bean plant may influence the pod sugar concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:1815 / 1822
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Boutraa, T
    Sanders, FE
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2001, 187 (04) : 251 - 257
  • [32] COMPARISON OF TILLAGE AND TIME OF NITROGEN APPLICATION IN THE PRODUCTION OF SPRING AND FALL SNAP BEANS (PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS L PROVIDER)
    BELLINDER, RR
    WILSON, HP
    MORSE, RD
    HORTSCIENCE, 1983, 18 (04) : 568 - 568
  • [33] Yield and yield components of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars affected by boric acid rates and methods of application
    Hosseini, Seyed Mashaallah
    Amini, Zohreh
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2019, 42 (11-12) : 1378 - 1385
  • [34] Smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybrids L) interference with snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) quality
    Lugo, MD
    Gonzalez, A
    Talbert, RE
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO, 1995, 79 (3-4): : 173 - 179
  • [35] Effect of biofertilizer consortium on yield, quality and soil health of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Saikia, Jamini
    Saikia, Luchon
    Phookan, Deepa Borbora
    Nath, Dhruba Jyoti
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2018, 41 (05) : 755 - 758
  • [36] Agronomic Practices to Increase the Yield and Quality of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): A Systematic Review
    Karavidas, Ioannis
    Ntatsi, Georgia
    Vougeleka, Vasiliki
    Karkanis, Anestis
    Ntanasi, Theodora
    Saitanis, Costas
    Agathokleous, Evgenios
    Ropokis, Andreas
    Sabatino, Leo
    Tran, Fanny
    Iannetta, Pietro P. M.
    Savvas, Dimitrios
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [37] CALLUS PRODUCTION FROM LEAF PROTOPLASTS OF VARIOUS CULTIVARS OF BEAN (PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS L)
    CREPY, L
    BARROS, LMG
    VALENTE, VRN
    PLANT CELL REPORTS, 1986, 5 (02) : 124 - 126
  • [38] Prospects of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production and commercialization in Benin
    Agoyi, Eric Etchikinto
    Ahomondji, Symphorien Essedjo
    Butare, Louis
    Nchanji, Eileen Bogweh
    Ayi, Sergino
    Assogbadjo, Achille
    Sinsin, Brice Augustin
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
  • [39] The performance of the CROPGRO model for bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield simulation
    de Oliveira, Evandro Chaves
    Nogueira da Costa, Jose Maria
    de Paula Junior, Trazilbo Jose
    Marques Ferreira, Williams Pinto
    Justino, Flavio Barbosa
    Neves, Leonardo de Oliveira
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2012, 34 (03): : 239 - 246
  • [40] Effects of planting season and plant cultivar on growth, development, and pod production in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Perez-Barbeito, Marlene
    Gonzalez, Ana Maria
    Rodino, Ana Paula
    De Ron, Antonio Miguel
    Santalla, Marta
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2008, 59 (12): : 1121 - 1129