Yield and Quality of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars from Successive Harvests in Spring and Fall Production Seasons in Oklahoma

被引:0
|
作者
Richmond, Jess [1 ]
Maness, Niels [1 ]
Goad, Carla [2 ]
Brandenberger, Lynn [1 ]
Mason, Tyler [1 ]
Kathi, Shivani [1 ]
Chrz, Donna [1 ]
Hu, Bizhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Hort & Landscape Architecture, 320G Agr Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Stat, 301F Math Sci Bldg, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
fructose; glucose; multiple harvest; planting season; sucrose; sugar; POLLEN GERMINATION; SEED SET; TEMPERATURE; FRUCTOSE; GLUCOSE; SUCROSE; ACCUMULATION; COMPONENTS; SWEETNESS;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI18146-24
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Numerous studies have evaluated snap bean pod yield and quality at different pod maturities, but only a few have evaluated yield and pod quality across different seasons within the same year or for pods harvested at the same relative maturity cessively from the same plants. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine if bean yield or pod sugar accumulation differed for pods at the same relative stage maturity from plants harvested multiple times in spring and fall planting seasons north central Oklahoma. Nine snap bean cultivars (seven green-podded and two low-podded) were fi eld-grown in Spring and Fall 2022 and 2023. Pods were harvested weekly for 3 weeks from the same plants and at the same relative pod development stage. Pod yield and sugar concentration were measured. The total pod yield pooled across seasons and years of ' Sybaris ' was lower (approximately 4100 kg ha- 1 ) that of six of the other cultivars, which yielded between 7000 to 8600 kg ha- 1 . In spring, pod yield increased from 900 to 1300 kg ha- 1 in the fi rst harvest to 3500 to 3700 kg ha by the last harvest. In Fall 2022, the yield decreased from 1900 kg ha- 1 in the fi rst harvest to 690 kgha-1 by the last harvest, whereas in Fall 2023 the pod yield remained steady at 2600 to 3000 kgha-1 at each weekly harvest. The Fall 2022 decrease in yield was likely caused by low temperatures during pod development and a freeze that shortened the harvest season. From the fi rst to the last harvest, the total pod sugar concentration decreased from 145.5 to 107.2 mg g-1, glucose decreased from 48.4 to 33.0 mg and fructose decreased from 90.7 to 52.0 mgg-1. However, the sucrose concentration creased from 9.2 to 21.9 mgg-1. This decrease in the total and monomeric sugar centrations, coupled with a disproportionally smaller increase in sucrose, is typical overly mature snap bean pods, which are considered less desirable because of lower sweetness. Snap bean pods harvested later in the growing season in a successive harvest system at the same relative stage of maturity as earlier harvested pods had sugar centrations resembling those of overly mature pods, indicating that snap bean plant may influence the pod sugar concentration.
引用
收藏
页码:1815 / 1822
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Yield and nutrimental quality of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) through planting dates
    Salinas Ramirez, Nicolas
    Escalante Estrada, J. Alberto
    Rodriguez Gonzalez, Ma. Teresa
    Sosa Montes, Eliseo
    REVISTA FITOTECNIA MEXICANA, 2008, 31 (03) : 235 - 241
  • [2] QTL mapping for pod quality and yield traits in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Njau, Serah Nyawira
    Parker, Travis A.
    Duitama, Jorge
    Gepts, Paul
    Arunga, Edith Esther
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2024, 15
  • [3] Changes in Yield and Quality Characteristics for Snap Beans Across Spring and Fall Harvest Seasons in Oklahoma
    Frentz, Taylor
    Maness, Niels
    Richmond, Jessica
    Brandenberger, Lynn
    Hu, Bizhen
    HORTSCIENCE, 2023, 58 (09) : SR41 - SR42
  • [4] Path analysis of yield and yield components in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Mayra Contreras-Rojas
    Dilmer Gabriel Guerra Guzmán
    Seir Antonio Salazar Mercado
    Fredy Antonio Salazar-Villareal
    Euphytica, 2024, 220
  • [5] Path analysis of yield and yield components in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Contreras-Rojas, Mayra
    Guzman, Dilmer Gabriel Guerra
    Mercado, Seir Antonio Salazar
    Salazar-Villareal, Fredy Antonio
    EUPHYTICA, 2024, 220 (03)
  • [6] Relationships of spectral traits with yield and nutritional quality of snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in dry seasons
    Nemeskeri, Eszter
    Molnar, Krisztina
    Helyes, Lajos
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2018, 64 (09) : 1222 - 1239
  • [7] Yield Stability of Heirloom Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars in Midwest Organic Production
    Swegarden, Hannah R.
    Sheaffer, Craig C.
    Michaels, Thomas E.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2016, 51 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [8] The effects of sowing dates on seed yield and quality of red podded bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars
    Balkaya, A.
    Odabas, M. S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IIIRD BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON VEGETABLE AND POTATOES, 2007, (729): : 151 - +
  • [9] Spatial dependence and experimental precision in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) trials related to the number of plants and harvests
    Lucio, Alessandro Dal'Col
    Benz, Vilson
    Storck, Lindolfo
    Cargnelutti Filho, Alberto
    CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA, 2016, 40 (02): : 184 - 197
  • [10] Drum priming in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seed
    Lopes, Higino Marcos
    Bennett, Mark Alan
    Brandao, Antonio de Amorim
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS-AGRARIA, 2018, 13 (02):