Good Practices for Health Technology Assessment Guideline Development: A Report of the Health Technology Assessment International, HTAsiaLink, and ISPOR Special Task Force

被引:0
|
作者
Botwright, Siobhan [1 ,2 ]
Sittimart, Manit [1 ]
Chavarina, Kinanti Khansa [1 ]
Bayani, Diana Beatriz [3 ]
Merlin, Tracy [4 ]
Surgey, Gavin [5 ]
Suharlim, Christian [6 ]
Espinoza, Manuel A. [7 ]
Culyer, Anthony J. [8 ]
Oortwijn, Wija [5 ]
Teerawattananon, Yot [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Minist Publ Hlth, Hlth Intervent & Technol Assessment Program HITAP, Nonthaburi, Thailand
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Hlth Technol Assessment AHTA, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Management Sci Hlth, Medford, MA USA
[7] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Santiago, Chile
[8] Univ York, Ctr Hlth Econ, York, England
关键词
evidence-informed priority setting; good practices; guidelines; HTA; BUDGET IMPACT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; PRINCIPLES; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; RECOMMENDATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; CONFLICTS; RESOURCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines are intended to support successful implementation of HTA by enhancing consistency and transparency in concepts, methods, process, and use, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the decision-making process. This report lays out good practices and practical recommendations for developing or updating HTA guidelines to ensure successful implementation. Methods: The task force was established in 2022 and comprised experts and academics from various geographical regions, each with substantial experience in developing HTA guidelines for national health policymaking. Literature reviews and key-informant interviews were conducted to inform these good practices. Stakeholder consultations, open peer reviews, and expert opinions validated the recommendations. A series of teleconferences among task force members was held to iteratively refine the report. Results: The recommendations cover 6 key aspects throughout the guideline development cycle: (1) setting objectives, scope, and principles of the guideline, (2) building a team for a quality guideline, (3) defining a stakeholder engagement plan, (iv) developing content and utilizing available resources, (v) putting in place appropriate institutional arrangements, and (vi) monitoring and evaluating guideline success. Conclusion: This report presents a set of resources and context-appropriate practices for developing or updating HTA guidelines. Across all contexts, the recommendations emphasize transparency, building trust among stakeholders, and fostering a culture of ongoing learning and improvement. The report recommends timing development and revision of guidelines according to the HTA landscape and pace of HTA institutionalization. Because HTA is increasingly used to inform different kinds of decision making in a variety of country contexts, it will be important to continue to monitor lessons learned to ensure the recommendations remain relevant and effective.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 15
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health technology assessment development in China
    Chen, Yingyao
    Banta, David
    Tang, Zhiliu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 : 202 - 209
  • [32] Estimating Health-State Utility for Economic Models in Clinical Studies: An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force Report
    Wolowacz, Sorrel E.
    Briggs, Andrew
    Belozeroff, Vasily
    Clarke, Philip
    Doward, Lynda
    Goeree, Ron
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Norman, Richard
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (06) : 704 - 719
  • [33] DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN ROMANIA
    Scintee, Silvia Gabriela
    Ciutan, Marius
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 33 (03) : 371 - 375
  • [34] The development of health technology assessment in Brazil
    Banta, David
    Almeida, Rosimary T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 : 255 - 259
  • [35] Development of health technology assessment in France
    Weill, Caroline
    Banta, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 25 : 108 - 111
  • [36] International practices in health technology assessment and public financing of digital health technologies: recommendations for Hungary
    Mezei, Fruzsina
    Horvath, Krisztian
    Palfi, Mate
    Lovas, Kornelia
    Adam, Ildiko
    Turi, Gergo
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
  • [37] Machine Learning Methods in Health Economics and Outcomes Research-The PALISADE Checklist: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task Force
    Padula, William, V
    Kreif, Noemi
    Vanness, David J.
    Adamson, Blythe
    Rueda, Juan-David
    Felizzi, Federico
    Jonsson, Pall
    IJzerman, Maarten J.
    Butte, Atul
    Crown, William
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : 1063 - 1080
  • [38] BUILDING BRIDGES BETWEEN REGULATION, HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AND CLINICAL GUIDELINE DEVELOPMENT
    Hogervorst, M.
    Mollebaek, M.
    Vreman, R. A.
    Wang, J.
    Mantel-Teeuwisse, A. K.
    Goettsch, W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S233 - S234
  • [39] International journal of technology assessment in health care
    Mäkelä, Marjukka
    International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2014, 30 (02)
  • [40] Health technology assessment in Brazil - an international perspective
    Gomes Lima, Sandra Goncalves
    de Brito, Claudia
    Coelho de Andrade, Carlos Jose
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2019, 24 (05): : 1708 - 1721