The Methodological Quality of Studies on Physical Exercise in Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

被引:1
|
作者
Nitz, Alexandrina Cavalcante Rodrigues [1 ,2 ]
Campos, Maria Joao [3 ]
Antunes, Ana Amelia Moraes [4 ]
Freitas, Emilly da Silva [5 ]
Toscano, Chrystiane Vasconcelos Andrade [6 ]
Ferreira, Jose Pedro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Fac Sport Sci & Phys Educ, P-3040248 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Sarah Network Hosp Rehabil, BR-60861634 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[3] Univ Coimbra, Fac Sport Sci & Phys Educ, Res Unit Sport & Phys Act CIDAF, uid dtp 04213 2020, P-3040248 Coimbra, Portugal
[4] Sarah Network Hosp Rehabil, BR-30510000 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Ceara, Physiotherapy Dept, BR-60430160 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[6] Fed Univ Alagoas UFAL, Inst Phys Educ & Sport, Res Project Phys Exercise People Autism Spectrum D, Maceio, AL, Brazil
关键词
physical activity; physical fitness; well-being; neurodevelopment disorder; teenager; rehabilitation; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare12202039
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses point to the benefits of physical exercise for adolescents with cerebral palsy, improving physical conditioning, muscle strength, balance, and walking speed. However, given the high number of reviews that include randomized and non-randomized studies, it is increasingly necessary to assess the methodological quality of these reviews. This scoping review investigated the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effects of physical exercise in adolescents with cerebral palsy to elucidate the methodological limitations of the research and the priorities to be observed in future research. Method: The electronic search used PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Studies published between 2016 and 2023 were selected. The terms used were "cerebral palsy" combined with "physical fitness", "exercise", and "physical activity". Results: A total of 219 original reviews were selected. Of these, 19 reviews were included for data analysis. AMSTAR2 was used to assess the methodological quality of the reviews. Three reviews presented high methodological quality (15.78%) and three had moderate methodological quality (15.78%). The remaining reviews had low or critically low methodological quality, according to AMSTAR2. Interpretation: This study evidenced that systematic reviews have variable methodological quality and that new studies are still needed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review
    Buczinski, S.
    Ferraro, S.
    Vandeweerd, J. M.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2018, 161 : 50 - 59
  • [42] Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: A systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses
    Cunningham, Conor
    O' Sullivan, Roger
    Caserotti, Paolo
    Tully, Mark A.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2020, 30 (05) : 816 - 827
  • [43] A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery
    Cullis, Paul Stephen
    Gudlaugsdottir, Katrin
    Andrews, James
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04):
  • [44] Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture
    Liu, Yali
    Zhang, Rui
    Huang, Jiao
    Zhao, Xu
    Liu, Danlu
    Sun, Wanting
    Mai, Yuefen
    Zhang, Peng
    Wang, Yajun
    Cao, Hua
    Yang, Ke Hu
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [45] Improving the Quality of the Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
    Behzadifar, Masoud
    Behzadifar, Meysam
    Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2018, 21 (04) : 183 - 183
  • [46] The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Industrial and Organizational Psychology: A Systematic Review
    Schalken, Naomi
    Rietbergen, Charlotte
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [47] Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of gene association studies
    Lovell, David Paul
    BIOMARKERS, 2016, 21 (08) : 673 - 677
  • [48] Challenges in the peer review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Vintzileos, Anthony M.
    Carvajal, Jonathan
    Islam, Shahidul
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (08): : 768 - 771
  • [49] Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in Veterinary Journals with AMSTAR
    Uzabaci, Ender
    Can, Fatma Ezgi
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2023, 29 (06) : 665 - 671
  • [50] Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Probiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pouchitis
    Dong, Jinpei
    Teng, Guigen
    Wei, Tiantong
    Gao, Wen
    Wang, Huahong
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):